Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Science theory of everything

views
     
bgeh
post Oct 31 2009, 06:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,814 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Awakened_Angel @ Oct 30 2009, 08:46 PM)
i see.... doing nothing or wont let us know something??  hmm.gif
*

They had a malfunction in the LHC last year. There was a bad connection in one of the superconducting cables, which quickly heated up, and I can't remember exactly what happened now, but it involved a heck a lot of the magnets (very strong ones too, 5-8T iirc - note they might sound low but they provide an extremely uniform field) going out of alignment, and then they also went boom, causing a lot of damage). Took a year to fix, implement new safety systems, and hopefully low energy collisions will happen in the next 2-3 weeks.


QUOTE(Awakened_Angel @ Oct 30 2009, 10:36 PM)
you know the biggest enemy of this research??? religion ; god
*

No it isn't.


QUOTE(joyyy @ Oct 30 2009, 10:45 PM)
The discovery of the Higgs boson would only explain the origin of mass. It wouldn't explain the origin of the Big Bang and that's all the Church cares about. As long as physicists are nowhere near solving the mystery of the Big Bang, the Church would point to the divine.  tongue.gif
*

By church you probably mean the catholic church; not all (christian) churches, or religions are against this.
The discovery of the Higgs boson would be experimental confirmation that the Higgs mechanism for particles exists.
bgeh
post Dec 16 2009, 02:00 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,814 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(empire23 @ Dec 15 2009, 09:27 PM)
Not really, Heisenberg postulated that "measurement" or "observation" would influence the final outcome to become "less accurate"

The principle you're generally looking for is the GIT, or Godel's Incompleteness Theorem.
*
I honestly don't think that Godel's Incompleteness Theorems actually apply to these things (well, they do, because most, if not all of physics rely on the Peano axioms for natural numbers)

I think he's talking about if a GUT/TOE can actually be found, would this mean that we'd be able to predict every single thing that will happen next? (determinism)

This post has been edited by bgeh: Dec 16 2009, 02:02 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0154sec    0.53    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 04:25 PM