Sony Ericsson Satio v2, Enhance the Unlimited Entertainment!
Sony Ericsson Satio v2, Enhance the Unlimited Entertainment!
|
|
Oct 27 2009, 03:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,220 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kerteh |
anyone can compare Satio's sound quality and loudness compare to 5800XM??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2009, 04:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,220 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kerteh |
QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ Oct 27 2009, 04:02 PM) Haven't tested sound on Satio but once I get my I will let my sister do the vetting. I heard she said 5800XM has slightly better sound quality than Ipod lolz do inform if u have any updates ya? thanks.. anyway i read the camera review at GSMArena.. the camera shutter speed and startup speed is quite slow laa.. same problem like my previous Innov8.. slow shutter speed and startup = no candid.. |
|
|
Oct 27 2009, 07:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,220 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kerteh |
QUOTE(xyngfei @ Oct 27 2009, 05:12 PM) Bro, thanks for your feedback... Thanks for the link bro.. ya indeed 3.5mm audio jack is important but i dun really mind coz im using bluetooth headset I really pray if SE can come out the 3.5mm audio jack... it's much more better compare to the existing audio port.. But end up.... dissapointed FYI http://www.symbian-guru.com/welcome/2009/1...ngs-i-hate.html QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Oct 27 2009, 06:49 PM) LOL.. no reason for me to change la then.. thanks for the info Added on October 27, 2009, 7:25 pm QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ Oct 27 2009, 05:12 PM) slow shutter speed? I saw it say the startup less than 3 seconds and even beats out pixon 12.... then got the Bestpic 7 consecutive shots somemore? less than 3 seconds is a lot d.. lol both pixon and satio have slow shutter speed.. all monster cameraphone is like that one.. wish they can improve the speed close to actual digicam in the future..This post has been edited by Aishiteru^Suki: Oct 27 2009, 07:25 PM |
|
|
Oct 27 2009, 08:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,220 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kerteh |
QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Oct 27 2009, 07:34 PM) the shutter speed isnt slow at all.i've tried in the Sony Ericsson event there.please don't worry about the shutter speed. From GSMArena:QUOTE Start-up time Sony Ericsson Satio 2.70 sec Samsung M8910 Pixon12 2.46 sec Shoot-to-preview Sony Ericsson Satio 1.65 sec Samsung M8910 Pixon12 3.03 sec Preview-to-standby Sony Ericsson Satio 0.80 sec Samsung M8910 Pixon12 2.70 sec Shot-to-shot (no preview) Sony Ericsson Satio 2.75 sec Samsung M8910 Pixon12 2.20 sec Based on what u tested is this justifiable? if it is then i should be worried.. |
|
|
Oct 27 2009, 08:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,220 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kerteh |
QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ Oct 27 2009, 08:12 PM) startup means when you wanna enter the camera mode from the phone menu etc.. some sort like that laa.. 2.7s Added on October 27, 2009, 8:28 pm QUOTE(squall_kay @ Oct 27 2009, 08:24 PM) maybe its better u test it by urself once its available. diff people dff judgement. 5800 ofcoz laa since its not a camera-centric phone.. its auto focus time is much faster though.. compared to my Innov8 that is.. ow well maybe i expect too much.. will test it when i have time.. thanks anyway, u r using 5800 rite, 5800's startup time & shot-2-shot also around that figure also. u can try it out. This post has been edited by Aishiteru^Suki: Oct 27 2009, 08:28 PM |
|
|
Oct 27 2009, 09:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,220 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kerteh |
QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ Oct 27 2009, 09:37 PM) You should ask how slow.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2009, 11:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,220 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kerteh |
|
|
|
Oct 28 2009, 10:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,220 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kerteh |
QUOTE(xyngfei @ Oct 28 2009, 09:57 AM) If u refer to my siggy its Jabra Stereo Bluetooth BT3030.. it has 3.5mm jack port so u can plug in any earphone u want.. though u will still have wire and not wireless.. my suggestion is if you buy this bluetooth headset u can pair it with a neck-strap type earphone so u can wear it like a pendant.. |
|
|
Oct 28 2009, 11:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,220 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kerteh |
QUOTE(Darkmage12 @ Oct 28 2009, 11:20 AM) Yep Universal.. its Jabra bro.. Ofcoz la it can supports most phones.. a very famous brandQUOTE(jaej00Ng89 @ Oct 28 2009, 11:23 AM) i prefer earphones with wire coz generally they have better audio quality than bluetooth headset.. BT3030 has 3.5mm Jack port so you can even use a 1k earphone along with it.. and I did ask in audiophiles section about audio quality when it transmit by using bluetooth compared to wires.. all sifus there said no difference bro.. |
|
|
Oct 28 2009, 11:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,220 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kerteh |
|
|
|
Oct 28 2009, 11:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,220 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Kerteh |
QUOTE(jaej00Ng89 @ Oct 28 2009, 11:44 AM) you were saying about the bluetooth earphone speker is not as good as wired one thus i said the ehadset has 3.5mm jack so that you can use any wired earphone u want along with it.. and about the audio quality over bluetooth i just added in, in case i understand your point wrongly.. ow well.. nevermind.. lol.. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0406sec
0.82
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 05:10 AM |