- To be released November 2009 (1 bulan lagi) - Better graphics then World at War - Complete and undiluted port from ps3/xbox360 - 10 multiplayer vs 8 only in WAW. - Improved friend code system - customized Controls: ala The conduit - The reason i still don't have a ps3 is because analog stick sucks! ps3/xbox can go down and suck Wii's remote.
No, it is COD modern warfare (the one released for ps3/xbox360 in 2007). i don't understand y fps gets priority for the hd systems before wii. wii has the best control system for fps. its the best way to play fps after paintball. i don't think i want to play fps any other way then the point and shoot way. and since when graphics is more important then game controls?
oh , and undiluted means not reduced in features, and in gameplay. giving a reference, cod WAW for wii was diluted compared to its xbox360/ps3 release
This post has been edited by ramz: Oct 10 2009, 09:53 PM
will get this too. i love COD WAW. but i was dissapointed of the conduit, coz its unimaginative, and looks like a 90's fps.
yes, they should stop doing ww2, unless then can inject something original into that. cod 3 and cod waw looks pretty the same to me. it would be nice to have a true open world fps. meaning true open world as in u are not guided on a certain path. do anybody know any fps games like that?
This post has been edited by ramz: Oct 11 2009, 05:44 AM
will get this too. i love COD WAW. but i was dissapointed of the conduit, coz its unimaginative, and looks like a 90's fps.
yes, they should stop doing ww2, unless then can inject something original into that. cod 3 and cod waw looks pretty the same to me. it would be nice to have a true open world fps. meaning true open world as in u are not guided on a certain path. do anybody know any fps games like that?
Open world eh?
I think the closest to that will be Fallout 3 in a way
Heh, got carried away. 1st person open world FPS, there's this FPS. I forgot what. It's really like GTA but first person. Steal a car, then langgar orang sana sini.
Crysis - it is fps - it is open world (but don't think u can roam until reach bukit bintang la), open world but with an objective - many ways to achieve your objective - you can play again and again experimenting with different approaches
now, this is different from COD. fallout 3 is kind of RPG, but does it have the above elements (not sure)? not sure about drago n rising. i google it first.
update: Ok, googled it already. Yeah that fits what i looking for too. Thanks phoenixbyte
I know this is out of topic, but if i want to play ps3 without using the stupid analog sticks, what other options do i have? is there a point and shoot add-on or something similiar i can play fps. I really really find it impossible to play fps on analog sticks, that is why i am asking.
This post has been edited by ramz: Oct 12 2009, 09:10 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
From: Equine Park, Seri Kembangan
QUOTE(ramz @ Oct 12 2009, 09:01 PM)
Crysis - it is fps - it is open world (but don't think u can roam until reach bukit bintang la), open world but with an objective - many ways to achieve your objective - you can play again and again experimenting with different approaches
now, this is different from COD. fallout 3 is kind of RPG, but does it have the above elements (not sure)? not sure about drago n rising. i google it first. update: Ok, googled it already. Yeah that fits what i looking for too. Thanks phoenixbyte
I know this is out of topic, but if i want to play ps3 without using the stupid analog sticks, what other options do i have? is there a point and shoot add-on or something similiar i can play fps. I really really find it impossible to play fps on analog sticks, that is why i am asking.
there's frag fx controller n also u can integrate the use of normal usb mouse n keyboard with some fps on the PS3. Xbox i dunno coz i don't have it. Maybe they can too.
IMHO, it just needed some getting used to I played modern warfare and Killzone fine on the ps3
i actually went to the ps3 section, and they all say it is matter of getting use to it. but this is the problem i had since ps2 days. so i guess i am an exception.
analyzing the problem, when u use your thumb to get from point a to point b. u need to 'get use' to the lilt angle of stick and the timing of the tilt. that's the problem with me, it is not in my brain circuits to learn this. it is so unnatural. remember the old ibm laptops that used to have a mini joysick at the middle of the keyboard as your mouse. its now obsolete coz people can't get use to it. in comparison, if i use the mouse, i just naturally 'place' it at point b. i don't even need to get use to it.
anyway, just frustrated why i can't get use to it. ignore me.
Added on November 15, 2009, 7:16 amhttp://nintendodpad.com/Welcome/News/Entries/2009/11/14_The_Hardcore%3A_%E2%80%9CWii_Remote_sucks%E2%80%9D.html
this is the only problem y i still don't have a ps3. other then my wife will kill me. spending 50 for a frag fx, then must as well stick to my pc.
This post has been edited by ramz: Nov 15 2009, 07:16 AM
well i'm getting it christmas when i am overseas. they won't have it here in malaysia for a while, other then the downloaded version. that's d thing about wii games in malaysia, its so low in demand. its a catch 22 situation. the reason why u can't buy the game is because its low in demand. and the reason why is low in demand is because nobody really wants to buy it.
Are you sure it's "undiluted" as claimed? On of the cornerstone of COD being a good game is its rock steady frame rate. From numerous reviews around the net, because of the dev wanting to get as close a COD4 look, the game may look beautiful but framerate suffers. Compound that with the control mechanism being a motion controller that REQUIRES precise and stutter-free framerate to be able to control onscreen cursor, I'd surmise that you will be battling the game controls than any in-game terrorists when the framerate start dipping wildly.
framerate problem is not a 'dilute' problem, its a technical problem. but i don't know. i haven't played the game. but if the framerate plays like cod WAW, then it should be reasonably ok. from the numerous reviews i read, some didn't mind it and some minded it, but most agree it is not a significant problem, hence the above average rating.
anyway, complex first person shooter are never wii's forte, not becuase of the controls, but because of the low end processor. this will be wii's problem until the end of its life.
and talking about 'being diluted', the wii lately has a VERY bad habit of releasing diluted ports from other consoles. i was surprise even the karaoke revolution port that should shine on the wii was diluted. F1 game also gets a kiddy and diluted port (although wii version was released first). i accept that wii graphics won't be as good, but why make a different version for the same game for the wii? i don't understand this, and it really pisses me off, to the point of considering ps3/upgrading my pc for christmas.
Joined: Apr 2005
From: Equine Park, Seri Kembangan
Wii (or maybe Wiii) should consider upgrading their gfx n processor just a little bit..they have a winning mechanism for the motion thingy already but the limitation on the graphics part is somewhat hinder it to other possibilities of the next gen.
I'm not talking about how pretty a game is..but more towards how many things can happen on screen at the same time.
u r right! but as long people perceive wii as a kiddy console, u won't see many mature games porting over. remember gamecube. it was more powerful then ps2 and arguably, xbox. but still many mature games didn't make it over. so yes, a more powerful machine will invite mature (and more complex) games to port over, but as history has proven, it is not the only ingredient.
Oct 8 2009, 07:10 AM, updated 16y ago
Quote
Maybe they can too.
0.0192sec
0.12
5 queries
GZIP Disabled