Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V32!, The Orange Legion

views
     
laszlo
post Oct 27 2009, 03:33 PM

Have... you met me?
******
Senior Member
1,473 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
QUOTE(DolphinDiver007 @ Oct 27 2009, 03:22 PM)
hi guys,
giving a choice of wide angle or prime lens, which one are u guys preferred??
*
Wide angle! Because I don't have one laugh.gif . There's also wide angle prime. Decide what you want to capture first.
lildaredevil906
post Oct 27 2009, 03:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
357 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: PJ/KL


prime for me =P cause i drool on the bokeh the 50mmf1.4 gives.. even better.. STF!!!!
Kul | Mo0
post Oct 27 2009, 03:50 PM

Cow's Zeiss
*******
Senior Member
3,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Damansara Utama


You're gonna get it bev. I'm gonna poison you with UWA very soon. Busy nowadays. ):
ronnie
post Oct 27 2009, 04:19 PM

Not enough stars
*********
All Stars
21,308 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(Uzumaki NaruTo @ Oct 27 2009, 02:51 PM)
Better don't . I  think your a200 is already sufficient enough (in comparison with F20AM) Yeah im also tempted with it but afte reading reviews and feedback from alphantics its better to buy f42 than f20 lor.
*
Any kind soul willing to borrow me HVL-F20AM to test out first ?
I tried the A200 + F42 and it feels HEAVY.... need some time to build some biceps
lildaredevil906
post Oct 27 2009, 04:33 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
357 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: PJ/KL


Mo0: waddd.. ur STF poison shield is up maa =P.. TT the time i tried uwa with a850.. I tell u.. i can jump in the view finder and swim around man..

ron: it is supposed to be that heavy =P, ur location is in KL, u come for the next TT lar.. im sure there is f20 around..
Innovation
post Oct 27 2009, 04:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
244 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
TT? isit frequent for alpha user around kl.. doh.gif nid to do some knowledge transfer from sifus here...

MechaHerc
post Oct 27 2009, 04:53 PM

アルファ ソニ
******
Senior Member
1,967 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Side 3



hi guyss wave.gif

more STF here..

user posted image
user posted image

source biggrin.gif
DolphinDiver007
post Oct 27 2009, 04:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
270 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
i like both! prime & wide angle!
but can only choose one!!!! hehe..... try to turn it into christmas present!!!
hohoho....... but hard to decide!!!!!
lildaredevil906
post Oct 27 2009, 04:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
357 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: PJ/KL


oh my.. the guitar is sharp till can poke my eyes with it... i did the same shot with my kitties, BIG difference.... dammit i need to dig out my pic and compare the sharpness..
hazril
post Oct 27 2009, 04:56 PM

.: This Is Brazil! :.
*******
Senior Member
3,070 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Damansara



QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Oct 27 2009, 03:50 PM)
You're gonna get it bev. I'm gonna poison you with UWA very soon. Busy nowadays. ):
*
gimme a C...!!!gimme a Z...!!!

CZ poison moo.... biggrin.gif


Kul | Mo0
post Oct 27 2009, 04:58 PM

Cow's Zeiss
*******
Senior Member
3,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Damansara Utama


Yea so little time to shoot nowadays le. ):After my finals la. (:
cheeft
post Oct 27 2009, 05:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


guys i was thinking of buying either the carl zeiss 16-80 or SAL16-105... in your opinion which one is more worth it... i dunno whether is it worth to pay more for the zeiss because from the review, the output is quite similar compare to 16-105... i know the contrast is nicer... arhh in a dilemma now...
Melv
post Oct 27 2009, 05:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
149 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


wow....the guitar shot is superb....awesome!!!!!!!!!
clivengu
post Oct 27 2009, 05:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,850 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(Uzumaki NaruTo @ Oct 27 2009, 08:59 AM)
Mornin'. Picture spam before going into a looong meeting sleep.gif

user posted image
*
Auuu.. nice colour. i like it!


QUOTE(ahtsong @ Oct 27 2009, 09:36 AM)
Some old town feel, Jonker Street Melaka

user posted image

user posted image

the second pic was use Sunset creative style for this reddish effect, 1st time using it.
*
Very nice series.. love both of them.. looks like hk 80's movie style...


QUOTE(cheeft @ Oct 27 2009, 05:02 PM)
guys i was thinking of buying either the carl zeiss 16-80 or SAL16-105... in your opinion which one is more worth it... i dunno whether is it worth to pay  more for the zeiss because from the review, the output is quite similar compare to 16-105... i know the contrast is nicer... arhh in a dilemma now...
*
The cz is from F3.5 till F 4.5 at 80mm .. actually very good i find...not sure bout the 16105

achew
post Oct 27 2009, 05:19 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(clivengu @ Oct 27 2009, 05:11 PM)
The cz is from F3.5 till F 4.5 at 80mm .. actually very good i find...not sure bout the 16105
*
yup..thats the part i like about CZ1680..reasonable big aperture compare to other non-constant F zoom lens..

but if u r talking about value for money..i guess 16105 is a good choice..
finejava
post Oct 27 2009, 05:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
340 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


1st picture spam

user posted image


user posted image

C&C are welcome...

This post has been edited by finejava: Oct 27 2009, 05:36 PM
cheeft
post Oct 27 2009, 05:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


yeah thats y im in a dilemma... 16-105 is really value for money and the range is longer... but the aperture is not that good is compare to cz16-80... cz16-80 got better aperture and better colour and contrast and most important thing is the T* lens coating... both got cons and pros...
achew
post Oct 27 2009, 05:31 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(cheeft @ Oct 27 2009, 05:27 PM)
yeah thats y im in a dilemma... 16-105 is really value for money and the range is longer... but the aperture is not that good is compare to cz16-80... cz16-80 got better aperture and better colour and contrast and most important thing is the T* lens coating... both got cons and pros...
*
i think u only need to consider on ur budget...

range wise..do u have beercan?or going to get beercan?or any zoom lens like that?if yes u probably wont need the additional range from 16105...
braindead_fr3ak
post Oct 27 2009, 05:32 PM

Ba$$ist On d ROCks
******
Senior Member
1,552 posts

Joined: Dec 2006

eh..another wanna get the cz16-80...ehehhe...nice!
clivengu
post Oct 27 2009, 05:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,850 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(cheeft @ Oct 27 2009, 05:27 PM)
yeah thats y im in a dilemma... 16-105 is really value for money and the range is longer... but the aperture is not that good is compare to cz16-80... cz16-80 got better aperture and better colour and contrast and most important thing is the T* lens coating... both got cons and pros...
*
If got budget.. i would say go for the 1680.. the lost of 25mm i think should be able to live with it. Better colour contrast n IQ brows.gif

126 Pages « < 122 123 124 125 126 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0270sec    0.84    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 11:14 AM