QUOTE(lightning69 @ Oct 23 2009, 03:39 PM)
Got my SAL18250 from a forumer in Alphanatics at RM800. Should be a good price right?
Haven't really try it yet.
so cheap aa.. kedai price is RM1999 ho ho hoHaven't really try it yet.
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V32!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 05:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,858 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Tawau, Sabah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 06:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: behind you |
anyone charge Sanyo eneloop with Powerex MH-C204W?
why my lights turn green in less than 1 hours? |
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 07:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
873 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 07:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: behind you |
|
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 07:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,503 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: ..Whenever i may roam... |
|
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 07:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: behind you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 07:29 PM
|
|
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
ieR: Of course, the background is much further away from the subject than the tree is.
No, the bokeh from the Tamron 70-200mm F2.8 is quite... plain and un-Minolta-like. It also lacks longitudinal chromatic aberration, and some people might like the Tamron because of this. The Sony 70-200mm F2.8G SSM however is very much like the Minolta 70-210mm F4 beercan but minus the purple fringing (I use this lens as reference since more people have had this.) It's too bad you don't have the Minolta 70-210mm F4 beercan, or you'd know what I'm talking about - the look is very different from the 'modern-looking' Sony 55-200mm F4-5.6 DT. ![]() Sony 55-200mm F4-5.6 DT ![]() Sony 55-200mm F4-5.6 DT ![]() Sony 55-200mm F4-5.6 DT ![]() Minolta 70-210mm F4 beercan ![]() Minolta 70-210mm F4 beercan ![]() Minolta 70-210mm F4 beercan |
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 07:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,982 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
Pic Spam
![]() |
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 07:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,503 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: ..Whenever i may roam... |
|
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 07:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: behind you |
|
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 07:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
873 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 08:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,503 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: ..Whenever i may roam... |
QUOTE(v1rtual @ Oct 23 2009, 07:46 PM) may i know why do you say so?? im using the same charger with imedion 2100mA fully charge in slightly more than 1 hour QUOTE(lehtung @ Oct 23 2009, 07:26 PM) its 2000mAH.. i suspect only its just a bit too fast for me, just start charging for a while then the lights turn green already.. coz my old sanyo battery charge only 20mins then lights turn green.. a few times charging later the battery kong.. |
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 09:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
456 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
nid some help here ...
when im capturing some photos that facing a light source like LCD or light bulbs with F1.4, i would captured those light reflection on the uv filter into my photos... its my cheap uv filter problem ? its fine without uv filter... @_@ This post has been edited by Hinika: Oct 23 2009, 09:09 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 09:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,070 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
QUOTE(Hinika @ Oct 23 2009, 09:07 PM) nid some help here ... that is called flare bro...cheapo uv tends to produce flare while more expensive uv lessen the flare effect.... when im capturing some photos that facing a light source like LCD or light bulbs with F1.4, i would captured those light reflection on the uv filter into my photos... its my cheap uv filter problem ? its fine without uv filter... @_@ |
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 09:31 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: KL |
any1 can help me? about photoshop..
i can view the image of the brush..need to select 1 by 1.. the type of view changes suddenly..idk why n how @_@ now the type of view is list type |
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 09:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Masking |
QUOTE(Hinika @ Oct 23 2009, 09:07 PM) nid some help here ... jus shoot without uv =)when im capturing some photos that facing a light source like LCD or light bulbs with F1.4, i would captured those light reflection on the uv filter into my photos... its my cheap uv filter problem ? its fine without uv filter... @_@ |
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 09:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
456 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(hazril @ Oct 23 2009, 09:14 PM) that is called flare bro...cheapo uv tends to produce flare while more expensive uv lessen the flare effect.... wat kind of uv filter ?like normal hoya uv filter ? or pro1d uv filter ? HD uv filter ? o.O" any recommended flare-less uv filter ?? QUOTE(achew @ Oct 23 2009, 09:49 PM) feel protect-less w/o filter = ="This post has been edited by Hinika: Oct 23 2009, 09:53 PM |
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 10:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Masking |
QUOTE(Hinika @ Oct 23 2009, 09:51 PM) wat kind of uv filter ? if i nt wrong..u get flares on all filters..but those exp one doesnt look so obvious..like normal hoya uv filter ? or pro1d uv filter ? HD uv filter ? o.O" any recommended flare-less uv filter ?? feel protect-less w/o filter = =" soon u'll get used to shoot without filter..u shd b carefull with or without filter anyway..n cheap filter nt only giv u flares..it degrades ur image quality too |
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 10:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,633 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: www.kelvinchiew.com |
QUOTE(amadeo @ Oct 23 2009, 12:41 PM) Sigma - 10-20 F3.5 EX DC HSM = 520 g thanks amadeo for the weight and price..looks like i know wat to get for my gf Sigma - 10-20 F4-5.6 EX DC = 470 g Minolta - AF DT 11-18 F4.5-5.6 D = 350 g Sony - AF DT 11-18 F4.5-5.6 D = 360 g Tamron - SP AF 11-18 F4.5-5.6 Di II LD Aspherical IF = 355 g so, u decide.. |
|
|
Oct 23 2009, 10:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,073 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
I am been poison with STD seriously....the reason is....wait talk later
btw, i notice one thing, not sure is true or not, alpha kit lens 22500 produce bokeh is also like paint bokeh (true?) ![]() that time before STD out, i saw other ppl using carl zeiss or minolta good lenses can produce round dot round dot bokeh in backgroud, i think wah so beautiful bokeh unlike kitlens bokeh. but come to STD, look like paiting bokeh also wor... but all ppl like this bokeh, then what different of STD with 55200 but seriously back to the reason, the STD background 100% look picture are seperb sharp This post has been edited by jimlim007: Oct 23 2009, 10:47 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0299sec
0.26
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 06:58 AM |