Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Nissan sentra vs toyota vios

views
     
x_barrage
post Nov 18 2009, 03:19 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(Pitmie @ Nov 18 2009, 11:44 AM)
After several years using Sentra 1.6 (AT), I decided to trade-in the car & I'd rather go for Sentra 1.8. I still love using Sentra, but somehow I can't get enough satisfaction using 1.6 (AT) for some reasons..like mine doesn't have full disc-brakes (drums at the rear really annoying during emergency, it feels so bad with only front disc-brakes)..another thing is I've been watching Sentra 1.8 so many times already & I think that the interior is also better than my 1.6 (2005)..with dashboard matches its leather seat colour, few wood-like trims, auto-close side mirrors, plus some other nice features.

I've heard that even 1.8 Sentra has better FC than 1.6, I wanna hear your views on this. I even contacted some Sentra 1.8 owners who want to sell their Sentra for that reason.
*

Nope. Sentra 1.6 (AT) had slightly better FC with 13km/L. Since 1.6 (AT) really feel underpower, going for 1.8 is good decision.

Sentra 1.8 DOHC average FC (50% City, 50% highway) around 12km/L. Comparable with Altis 1.8 DOHC but lose a bit to i-Vtec Civic 1.8 SOHC (12.5km/L).

This post has been edited by x_barrage: Nov 18 2009, 03:22 PM
Pitmie
post Nov 18 2009, 04:50 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Nov 2009


QUOTE(x_barrage @ Nov 18 2009, 03:19 PM)
Nope. Sentra 1.6 (AT) had slightly better FC with 13km/L. Since 1.6 (AT) really feel underpower, going for 1.8 is good decision.

Sentra 1.8 DOHC average FC (50% City, 50% highway) around 12km/L. Comparable with Altis 1.8 DOHC but lose a bit to i-Vtec Civic 1.8 SOHC (12.5km/L).
*
I know it's a difficult decision to make since both are almost exactly the same car, the only differences between the two 200cc & 10bhp with some additional features in 1.8. I've never driven any 1.8 Sentra before, so I can't really tell how much difference it has in terms of power to the 1.6 version. I learned that 1.6 has about 118bhp while 1.8 has 128bhp. My 1.6 (AT) really feels under-power when a/c is on & when 4-5 adult passengers on board, unless if you drive alone or with 1-2 passengers..only then problem of under-power is not an issue.

As far as FC of both cars is concerned, I think I'm quite okay with my 1.6 & I'm sure 1.8's FC shouldn't be much of a problem to me, unless if it drinks petrol like a 2.5 V6 Naza RIA. biggrin.gif
x_barrage
post Nov 18 2009, 05:05 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
2.5cc vs 1.8cc? That's huge gap to compare.

Nissan’s rear brake disc you can get cheap as RM400 at half-cut. Also you still can get Auto flip side mirror for Fl1 & Fl2 (N16 2nd & 3rd generation) model at around RM100 price. If you want full set, there is ppl sell it at RM60 at Nismo forum. Just dig it.

For new N16 Sport (1.6L), TCM already include auto flip mirror, dashboard maple wood interior & black sporty color. Leather seat is optional for RM300. I personally don’t like leather seat thus go for tricot in hoping to change to Sporty Recaro seat, but later find regret since don’t have rear seat arm rest. How am I supposed to find Sentra Recaro rear seat? So go for leather seat if available.


This post has been edited by x_barrage: Nov 22 2009, 04:40 PM
Hoong.ster
post Nov 22 2009, 03:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
Bros my GXE 1.8A 2002 is giving 280km on 37l of fuel.

Which translates to 7.5km / l, full city (subang, BU, ss2)

Can any bros comment on the possible issues? I sent to different ETCM service centers, so far not able to troubleshoot the real problem yet.

I'm pretty sure 7.5km / l is high even for 100% city drive.

really need sifu's help on this, thanks!
x_barrage
post Nov 22 2009, 04:39 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
Your N16 is pre-FL (1st generation). Also first test VTC on N16, thus it's doesn't very efficient & most N16 GXE owner feel that way too. Even TCM was not dare to put VTC badge on Pre-FL. Not much you can do about it. For performance, you can try to adjust your Sentra Header to 4-2-1 with all the pipe change to same big like Frontier's pipe. So now when engine run over 4000RPM = [VTC ON] The VTC Open you will feel the car like got a Turbo Power make your car more powerful run!! The feel is better then Frontier Engine over 2000RPM Turbo On. Or probable it's only your feeling.

This post has been edited by x_barrage: Nov 22 2009, 04:43 PM
Hoong.ster
post Nov 22 2009, 07:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
Are you implying that RM 7.5km/l is the best this QG18DE can give?
I think even if it's Pre-FL and whatnot, 7.5km/l is still abit on the high side, don't u think? My family's 15 year ol Merc W124 2,399 cc gets around the same mileage (7km to the liter)!

And AFAIK the 1.8 engines on preFL and FL1 are essentially the same QG18de, how much more fuel-efficient can it be after the FL?

pls enlighten. Thanks!
x_barrage
post Nov 23 2009, 01:31 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
Who knows what Nissan put on their early QG batch production. Nissan Sunny 130Y around 8km/L considered best at it's time. Early QG18DE should higher than 8km/L. As I said before, many Pre-FL Sentra owner complain about the same things especially VTC functionality inside which is different from QG16DE since QG18DE using N-CVT which is already used by Nissan since 1987. If N-CVT is the cause, we can't do nothing except put a new version ECU's controlled VTC same as FL1 & FL2 or new VTC engine. One of my Pre-FL friends already put SR16VE (VVL) to replace QG16DE (VTC) inside. drool.gif The problem usually happens on Pre-FL model since it is rojak with Nissan Pulsar.

Or you can try send your car to mechanic to tuning Cam head inside the engine matching with fuel save you desire, but it will affect your car acceleration. Since all Sentra are DOHC, tuning should be no problem for most experienced workshop. If you send to TCM they only tuning using computerize. Try going for manual tuning for better result, after all your car warranty already ended after 3 years purchase, so nothing to lose.

This post has been edited by x_barrage: Nov 23 2009, 01:52 AM
dstl1128
post Nov 23 2009, 07:44 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(x_barrage @ Nov 23 2009, 01:31 AM)
Who knows what Nissan put on their early QG batch production. Nissan Sunny 130Y around 8km/L considered best at it's time. Early QG18DE should higher than 8km/L.
*
A similar car Toyota GL KE70 could get at least 13km/L and you still consider 8km/L best at it's time? Come on.


QUOTE
The highest FC record I got should be 670km per 45L for 100% highway drive. That make around 14.8km/L. That time my mileage still below 10000km so all part still tight to got real FC. However, there are people at NismoClub forum claim it can reach 700km so around 15km/L. That if you think VIOS FC is far better with only 1.2km per liter comparing to Sentra which is 1.6cc

Using 100% highway drive for your Sentra can you get 14.8km/L and using the figure to compared to a FC of non-100% highway drive of Vios - you win!! notworthy.gif
hmm.gif I know where we are getting...




p/s: For all I know with my Vios, 100% highway FC I got 3.8km/L more than your Sentra (not the meager that you dream of 1.2km/L).
jimmylim85
post Nov 23 2009, 08:46 AM

iPhone world....
*******
Senior Member
7,826 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh




QUOTE(x_barrage @ Nov 23 2009, 01:31 AM)
Who knows what Nissan put on their early QG batch production. Nissan Sunny 130Y around 8km/L considered best at it's time. Early QG18DE should higher than 8km/L. As I said before, many Pre-FL Sentra owner complain about the same things especially VTC functionality inside which is different from QG16DE since QG18DE using N-CVT which is already used by Nissan since 1987. If N-CVT is the cause, we can't do nothing except put a new version ECU's controlled VTC same as FL1 & FL2 or new VTC engine. One of my Pre-FL friends already put SR16VE (VVL) to replace QG16DE (VTC) inside.  drool.gif  The problem usually happens on Pre-FL model since it is rojak with Nissan Pulsar.

Or you can try send your car to mechanic to tuning Cam head inside the engine matching with fuel save you desire, but it will affect your car acceleration. Since all Sentra are DOHC, tuning should be no problem for most experienced workshop. If you send to TCM they only tuning using computerize. Try going for manual tuning for better result, after all your car warranty already ended after 3 years purchase, so nothing to lose.
*
Does a Sentra 1.8L second facelift somewhere 2005 to 2006 worth it without much problem with VTC stuff?
x_barrage
post Nov 23 2009, 10:23 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
Yes. FL1 model should already fully utilize VTC thus TCM already put VTC badge on all their Sentra's. Just remember, Many Altis owner also complain about their FC although it is not too bad for 1.8L. What FC can we really expect for 1.8L?

QUOTE(dstl1128 @ Nov 23 2009, 07:44 AM)
A similar car Toyota GL KE70 could get at least 13km/L and you still consider 8km/L best at it's time? Come on.
*

C'mon. We're not talking about Toyota vs Nissan this time don't we? It make feel really like on Fanboy defense force. We can talk all day long about this, but I won't reply again to you if it's not regarding Vios & Sentra. No more.

QUOTE(dstl1128 @ Nov 23 2009, 07:44 AM)
p/s: For all I know with my Vios, 100% highway FC I got 3.8km/L more than your Sentra (not the meager that you dream of 1.2km/L).
*

Lucky google always siding with me on this one. It not so hard typing Vios FC on Google search button. icon_rolleyes.gif
Probably should add RON95 not V-Power more kilometer = more pricey. hmm.gif nah. No need to.
Also, as a proud VIOS FC owner, you should contribute your FC record here: http://www.oneshift.com/pdb/lcmuserfc.php?pid=1234 & I'm glad there is ppl with higher record than you, but don't forget to visit Sunny (Sentra in Singapore) section too. brows.gif

This post has been edited by x_barrage: Nov 24 2009, 12:04 AM
advanceNissan
post Nov 24 2009, 03:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: May 2008


QUOTE(Hoong.ster @ Nov 22 2009, 07:30 PM)
Are you implying that RM 7.5km/l is the best this QG18DE can give?
I think even if it's Pre-FL and whatnot, 7.5km/l is still abit on the high side, don't u think? My family's 15 year ol Merc W124 2,399 cc gets around the same mileage (7km to the liter)!

And AFAIK the 1.8 engines on preFL and FL1 are essentially the same QG18de, how much more fuel-efficient can it be after the FL?

pls enlighten. Thanks!
*
Dude, i think you need to drive your car go to TC to check your engine, QG18DE fully city drive, or we call it extra urban FC should be around 9-11km/l, not like yours 7.5km/l.
x_barrage
post Nov 28 2009, 07:06 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(b48753 @ Nov 15 2009, 11:49 AM)
You yet to see SR16VE smokes B16 and SR20VE smokes K20...brows.gif
*

Adding:
They also yet to see N16 1.6 (MT) smokes Civic 2.0 i-vtec...brows.gif

Vaiz
post Nov 28 2009, 07:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
235 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: MI6


QUOTE(x_barrage @ Nov 28 2009, 07:06 PM)
Adding:
They also yet to see N16 1.6 (MT) smokes Civic 2.0 i-vtec...brows.gif

*
I saw Civic but it just a spilt second bro, cant really convince me though.

But with your above statement, im proud of my N16!
x_barrage
post Nov 28 2009, 08:58 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
At the moment there is also Toyota Harrier in front if you refer to video closely which is also speeding with Civic. I just came took them all. However I lose for pick-up at first, but after their car already reach max top speed my speed still increasing. My Sentra (MT) might have better top speed, but acceleration a bit loses at a moment. I don’t know if it is because I’m using RON95.

Actually the videos main purpose is to show my Speedometer problem to get advice from Nissan expertise. It is just coincidence there is also Civic 2.0 to test our speeding, so I just put it also. nod.gif

This post has been edited by x_barrage: Nov 28 2009, 09:00 PM
JAYworm
post Nov 28 2009, 11:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,131 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: K.L.


QUOTE(x_barrage @ Nov 28 2009, 07:06 PM)
Adding:
They also yet to see N16 1.6 (MT) smokes Civic 2.0 i-vtec...brows.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
wah 2.28- 2.30 the speed meter suddenly increase from 80km/h to 170km/h blink.gif nitro ke?
x_barrage
post Nov 28 2009, 11:47 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
As I said before, Sentra speedometer can only read 180kph, but the car probably can go more than 220kph. You can see after 180kph the speedometer show lower reading although the car’s go faster. Just watch tachometer still increasing although speedometers reduce from 180kph until 60kph. After I slow down the car (watch tachometer decrease) the speedometer try to catch up with actual speed since in can read for 180kph & below. That’s why it quickly goes for 180kph to measure exact 180kph. No nitrous applied here. sweat.gif

This post has been edited by x_barrage: Nov 28 2009, 11:50 PM
digitheatre
post Nov 29 2009, 12:10 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
654 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
smoke? ROFL ... dude...with that speed..those cars just cruising ler... zzz
grow up

This post has been edited by digitheatre: Nov 29 2009, 12:11 AM
advanceNissan
post Nov 29 2009, 01:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: May 2008


I think the speedomeer got problem lar, how can the speed decrease but the RPM still stay at 5000++ ? Should send it for checking.

imperialrealcs
post Nov 29 2009, 03:23 AM

IMPERIAL DEATH STAR!
*******
Senior Member
6,724 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Seri Petaling



QUOTE(x_barrage @ Nov 28 2009, 11:47 PM)
As I said before, Sentra speedometer can only read 180kph, but the car probably can go more than 220kph. You can see after 180kph the speedometer show lower reading although the car’s go faster. Just watch tachometer still increasing although speedometers reduce from 180kph until 60kph. After I slow down the car (watch tachometer decrease) the speedometer try to catch up with actual speed since in can read for 180kph & below. That’s why it quickly goes for 180kph to measure exact 180kph. No nitrous applied here. sweat.gif
*
im somewhat skeptical about the bolded line.. do u actually know how speedometer work? do u realise what were u saying about catch up and stuff?
probably ur speedometer were inaccurate dawg.. to test this, use gps instead
hush_puppies
post Nov 29 2009, 04:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
60 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(x_barrage @ Nov 28 2009, 07:06 PM)
Adding:
They also yet to see N16 1.6 (MT) smokes Civic 2.0 i-vtec...brows.gif
sweat.... u called this smokes? =.=''
if the Civic 2.0 tab 2 gear lower of the paddle shift, press a bit hard on the pedal, now u can smell the smokes

7 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0250sec    0.92    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 01:05 AM