Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Business ACCA, Which college or university ?
|
rachelmay1402
|
Aug 23 2006, 05:31 PM
|
Getting Started

|
hello i accidently make a new post out there. suppose to post it here hmm now another ACCA thing there hopefully i maybe able to delete it. anyway any audit genious here i have failed this paper for three times  feel bad coz i cannot take my core level now. hopefully the audit sifu could help me out on this. regards rachel may
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Sep 27 2006, 01:50 PM
|
Getting Started

|
so tell me the different approach to handle 2.6 and 3.1? sure there is some audit genius can help me on this (thanks in advance) regards rachelmay
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Sep 27 2006, 10:43 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(coolly @ Sep 27 2006, 08:33 PM) me not genius...but jus share with some thought of mine with u... for 2.6,knowing each procedures of audit are important for u to apply in ur exam..so please learn a general rules of procedure and apply accordingly to the past years question..so past yr is quite important... for 3.1,wat u need to know is think urself as auditor,able to spot the problems and able to express ur ideas to the case,so for 3.1,it is very lively papers,of coz u need some audit knowledge to back up ur point... u mine pm me ur email....  thanks for your explaination sifu... i will keep in touch with you...(just send you my email address)
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Sep 28 2006, 08:41 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(hikari @ Sep 27 2006, 11:23 PM) not a genius also, but.. this is roughly how i pass my 2.6 and 3.1.. basically is understanding the syllabus, understanding how the exam questions are structured, understand what the examiner like to ask what type of questions and understand what is AUDIT. understanding plays a big part in passing audit paper bcos without understanding u'll be struggling to apply ur knowledge.. memorise and vomit out the answers works, but why study so hard while u can just pass by understanding it. another thing is the ability to express youself. basically this is about ur command of english. from what you have posted i dun think u'll have problem with this  u still can memorise hard for 2.6 but when it comes to 3.1, it just doesnt work that way anymore.. the different between 2.6 and 3.1 is the level of audit knowledge required.. in 2.6 ur role is as a senior/junior auditor.. but in 3.1, u must be able to see things(mainly audit and business risk) as a manager and above.. so the way u look at things in both papers differ.. different perspective all together.. and does audit experience helps? maybe, but not necessarily.. i believe without audit experience you still can pass the papers, that is if you understand audit. so the key thing is UNDERSTAND and EXPRESS YOURSELF.. these key points works for all part 3 papers.. =) practise practice and practice.. tax during lower level is always about calculation.. to pass all you need to do is to practise ur question, then u'll automatically understand and know what to do when u read the question.. thanks hikari i will print this particular paragraph of yours because i think this is very important for my reminder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Sep 28 2006, 08:46 PM
|
Getting Started

|
but for paper 3.1, the textbook is important or not? coz i hardly touch the bpp 3.1 textbook...
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Oct 6 2006, 03:09 AM
|
Getting Started

|
hey i have something i need to confirm with you all.
in RPGT, for the "private residence exemption" now the husband AND wife can claim right? to be clearer, each entitle one claim eventhough they married already. unlike last time, if both married ONLY the husband can claim..am i right??? do correct me if i am wrong?
This post has been edited by rachelmay1402: Oct 6 2006, 03:17 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Oct 7 2006, 02:25 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(niu_niu @ Oct 1 2006, 12:01 PM) hehe thanks for your time to explain it to me (another sifu)
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Oct 8 2006, 08:16 PM
|
Getting Started

|
hey i have something i need to confirm with you all.
in RPGT, for the "private residence exemption" now the husband AND wife can claim right? to be clearer, each entitle one claim eventhough they married already. unlike last time, if both married ONLY the husband can claim..am i right??? do correct me if i am wrong?
anyone??? i confuse on this particular segment..
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Oct 8 2006, 11:28 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(coolly @ Oct 8 2006, 09:49 PM) ya,correct... husband and wife each is entitled one exemption and no matter married or not also got untill he/she claimed.... thank you, thank you  couldn't say more than that, coolly...
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Oct 30 2006, 03:50 PM
|
Getting Started

|
my history of acca 1.1,1.2,1.3,2.2,2.5 (pass at second attempt) 2.1,2.3,2.4 (pass at third attempt) now doing optional i know when i go out for interview later I AM SO DEAD and people will BULLY ME and to be frank i am not a party-goer i stay at home after class but jus that i am not the ingredient for ACCA but since already pass many paper i don't wanna give up lor later go out basic must be rm1000 like that
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Oct 31 2006, 02:23 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(coolly @ Oct 30 2006, 08:50 PM) umm...actually what u worry for?for these papers that u passed,in kl u can get around 1200 and above....  yalor i shdn't worry too much abt it...i know if can stay away from the DEVIL TV i can do it...anyway, hope this dec i can go through...ching (thank you)
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Nov 13 2006, 07:18 PM
|
Getting Started

|
December 2006 Hot Topics (C) 2006 FTMSONLI1 NE
For 3.1, the hot topics for this coming December 2006 exams include: a) Business risk identification (see past exam papers from June 2003 to June 2005). Prepare for identification of business risks and how the company should manage the risks or what internal controls will help to reduce those risks. See June Q2 and Dec 2004 Q1. Also linking business risks to FS risks like Dec 2003 Q1a.
b) Almost likely a question on identifying principal audit risks/financial statement risks. See past papers (plenty of them).
c) Group audit and acquisition. Impact of an acquisition on the audit (see past year exam like Pilot Q1, Dec 2001 Q1). Include audit strategies/approaches. See June 2005 Q2 and June 2006 Q2 on due diligence and what factors to consider before accepting the engagement. Though appeared recently, may come back again!
d) Planning is important. Planning issues to consider - See June 2002 Q2a, Dec 2002 Q1a.
e) Auditing prospective financial information, PFI (see Dec 2002 Q2), including reporting on PFI.
f) Quality controls - practice management, setting of fees, paying commission for referrals. See Dec 2001 Q2.
g) Working papers - Explain the reasons for preparing and keeping working papers and the importance of reviewing them.
h) Insurance (define PII and FGI, factors affecting the amount of cover, adv and disadv of insurance).
i) Accounting problems/issues (the usual Q3) - Important areas include leases, deferred tax, related parties, earnings per share, government grants, intangible assets and impairment, investment property, assets held for sale/discontinued operations, going concern.
j) Ethical issues facing the auditor - practice lots of Q5 and take note of confidentiality. (Identify circumstances in which the disclosure is permitted or required and discuss the factors, which may justify disclosure under public interest)
k) Assurance and other services - review, agreed upon procedures. Explain why agreed upon and compilation engagements do not (usually) meet the requirements for an assurance engagement and illustrate the form and content of a report of factual findings
l) Ownership of documents/books and working papers. Explain the general principles governing the ownership of and right to access to documents and papers. Explain the legal right of lien and describe the circumstances in which it may exercised. The extent to which clients and third party may have access to documents and papers.
m) Responsibility for summarized financial statements, financial reporting on the internet (see Dec 2003 Q4bii)
n) Reporting - The usual Q4 audit report. But must also be prepared for Review/Agreed upon procedures and reporting. (see item k above)
o) Internal audit (never been examined) - reliance on IA. Outsourcing of accounting function to service organization and it's impact on the conduct of the audit (relying on service organization)
p) Identify circumstances in which auditor may have legal liability and explain the other criteria for legal liability to be recognized. Distinguish between liability to client and liability to third party. Lastly, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of audit liability claims being settle out of court. (this section never not being examined, maybe a Q6 this Dec??)
q) Environment and the auditor (Pilot Q6). Small company audit exemption. Any October/November 06 article by Kim? If yes, must study that. If no article, do not attempt Q6. Do Q4 instead
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Nov 20 2006, 08:30 PM
|
Getting Started

|
hello to my dear ACCA warrior, i have just received the FTC HK exam tip which is relevant to us here is : a) 2.4 b) 2.6 c) 3.1 d) 3.5-3.7 i tried to post it here but to no avail. so i love to know who is interested here to provide me your e-mail. i will wait until tuesday night then only i post to all of your mailbox. hope to hear from you soon This post has been edited by rachelmay1402: Nov 20 2006, 08:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Nov 20 2006, 11:00 PM
|
Getting Started

|
thank you coolly for helping me that.  much appreciated. to all ACCA warrior, all the best in the exam This post has been edited by rachelmay1402: Nov 20 2006, 11:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Nov 21 2006, 01:23 PM
|
Getting Started

|
hallo ACCA warrior, here is the website for FTC HK TIP try download from here... http://www.ftckaplan.com.hk/img/products/a...cca_dec2006.pdfhope that help! happy fighthing
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Nov 22 2006, 09:46 PM
|
Getting Started

|
can someone explain para 19 of RPGT in simple word for me  ...thank you sifu
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Nov 23 2006, 04:24 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(niu_niu @ Nov 23 2006, 10:29 AM) Summary:Para 19(1):Gift upon death Para 19(2):Legatee acquired asset instead of money legacy from executor....AP=whichever is lower(money legacy v MV of real property) Para 19(3):Executor dispose to 3rd party Para 19(3A):Executor transfer to legatee Para 19(4):Referring to para 17, AP of asset acquired = AP of acquirer + PE Para 19(5):Referring to para 3(b), where AP of asset acquired by disposer = AP of acquirer(consideration for the asset) + PE Para 19(6):Referring transfer of asset previously transfered under para 3(b), from fixed asset to current asset. Such a transfer is liable to RPGT...AP? Refer para 19(5)  you are such a HERO to me. thousand appreciation  rachel "kow tow" to niu niu. may the day fill with blessing
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Nov 25 2006, 03:21 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(niu_niu @ Nov 24 2006, 05:00 PM) Dear all 3.2 candidates..... I got a Question here regarding LIHC. For LIHC, should we include the exempt income when computing the apportionment for common expenses and capital allowance? The examiner article on IHC is silent on this and it's not stated in the law s60FA on should/should not apportion those items to exempt income. Logically speaking, i thk should be included. If not, my taxable income will get all the portion of expenses and hence my chargeable income will drop..... Any comments??? Thx  kinda make worry a bit about your question. this thing only strike my head after seeing your message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Nov 30 2006, 10:28 PM
|
Getting Started

|
breath in  breath out  keep this practice before entering into exam hall hehe hope can relax a bit
|
|
|
|
|
|
rachelmay1402
|
Dec 4 2006, 08:23 PM
|
Getting Started

|
mixed with different feeling now  wake up every few minutes, too pressured already  ......
|
|
|
|
|