Oct 21 2009, 04:40 PM
QUOTE(wuszhtag @ Oct 21 2009, 02:30 PM)
all bros,
im really keen to get nikon d3000 right now. already compare n test d3000 and 1000d in my hands and i really like d3000
the only things that bother me is the fact that d3000 doesnt have AF motor in it. is this a serious issue in terms of budget, performance and my noobness?
budget - how much usually AF lens cost? i know there are several types of lens but generally on what range.
performance - need to do manual focus while taking pics, does this will affect how fast can u focus.is manual focus really hard?
my noobness - im a noob. so i think using manual focus really can help me learn lots of things about dslr, but is it worth to get d3000 or i better go for d70 or d80?
Dupe,you might wanna read this review.D3000 is underseen by some reviewers among the web,some are giving negative comments.They claim that D3000 is worse in high ISO than a D40.SOS I got this from the forumer in other threads,kindly take a look before making your decision too recklessly.im really keen to get nikon d3000 right now. already compare n test d3000 and 1000d in my hands and i really like d3000
the only things that bother me is the fact that d3000 doesnt have AF motor in it. is this a serious issue in terms of budget, performance and my noobness?
budget - how much usually AF lens cost? i know there are several types of lens but generally on what range.
performance - need to do manual focus while taking pics, does this will affect how fast can u focus.is manual focus really hard?
my noobness - im a noob. so i think using manual focus really can help me learn lots of things about dslr, but is it worth to get d3000 or i better go for d70 or d80?
Added on October 21, 2009, 4:43 pm
QUOTE(maxh3h3 @ Oct 21 2009, 04:28 PM)
why do u like nikon d3000 and why u prefer nikon better than canon?
Actually if u use nikon long enough, u ll be able to tell what kinda quality coming out from canons and nikons
This is just some comment that i got from most SLR players : -
nikon = VERY SHARP , MORE VIVID
canon = GOOD SHARP , SOFTER
Some wedding companies have request from customer to use canons only
because nikon is too good in bringing out all the pimples and eyebags
Cons and pro,
Joining SLR world cheap and save is the best way to start
If u do alot of portraits, maybe u ll keen on getting a cheap 50 mm lens
If it yes, u could consider :-
canon 1000d = smallest and cheapest ( not sexy at all)
nikon d70 / d70s / d80 = secondhand body only = rm 1000++ / rm 1150++ / rm 1800++(very sexy )
d70/s consider quite old with small lcd screen but still more sexy on a guys hand
If u not planning to get this 50 mm, there is no problem for u to get a d40/x/d60/d3000 which some players start selling it cheap in secondhand.
I feel like this is not accurate but at least the brand only indeed does not judges the camera's characteristics right?Actually if u use nikon long enough, u ll be able to tell what kinda quality coming out from canons and nikons
This is just some comment that i got from most SLR players : -
nikon = VERY SHARP , MORE VIVID
canon = GOOD SHARP , SOFTER
Some wedding companies have request from customer to use canons only
because nikon is too good in bringing out all the pimples and eyebags
Cons and pro,
Joining SLR world cheap and save is the best way to start
If u do alot of portraits, maybe u ll keen on getting a cheap 50 mm lens
If it yes, u could consider :-
canon 1000d = smallest and cheapest ( not sexy at all)
nikon d70 / d70s / d80 = secondhand body only = rm 1000++ / rm 1150++ / rm 1800++(very sexy )
d70/s consider quite old with small lcd screen but still more sexy on a guys hand
If u not planning to get this 50 mm, there is no problem for u to get a d40/x/d60/d3000 which some players start selling it cheap in secondhand.
This post has been edited by minghao: Oct 21 2009, 04:44 PM
Quote
0.0394sec
0.20
7 queries
GZIP Disabled