Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D5000 V6, Entry Level Digital SLR from Nikon.
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 13 2009, 07:28 PM
|
|
QUOTE(semaynikonian @ Nov 13 2009, 06:35 PM) Hi all, I just bought my D3000 not more than a week (4days to be exact), bought Body Only for RM1620 and top up RM130 for 4GB, a DSLR bag (cheap one), a tripop and a screen protector... (The screen protector brand DC what RSP is RM199, really expensive, but I dun know whether the price goes like this cause I'm new in this hobby). I'm now having a Nikkor 18-200mm borrow from friend to play around. Actually aiming Nikkor 18-105mm (D90 Kitlens) to fit my D3000 for travelling purpose... Anyone here know where can get 2nd hand cheap?? or anyone here willing to let go theirs?? Pls let me know... Budget is around RM750. I hope can learn something from all the Sifus here.. P/S: Planning to go Bkt Tinggi near Genting tomorrow for Photo Shooting cum outing... Might post some photos for urs comment... I'm really noob in this. This Pic taken 1 hour after I got my D3000. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Comments?? what type & brand of memory card u got? This post has been edited by jsc_tidus: Nov 13 2009, 07:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 14 2009, 11:53 AM
|
|
QUOTE(SkyBlue99 @ Nov 14 2009, 11:49 AM) i think they learnt their lesson. dont dare to mark it up high already  their shop is very nice, but..
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 14 2009, 11:59 AM
|
|
QUOTE D3s & 70-200VR II – Just not what I expected!
November 13, 2009 by Moose
We spent the day with a most delightful group of shooters at our Adorama workshop. We started on the Manhattan side of the Brooklyn Bay Bridge and ended up in DUMBO. I took advantage of the time to shoot with the D3s & 70-200VR II. To be honest with you, I really thought the D3s was no more than a D3 with video. I couldn’t have been more wrong. And the 70-200VR II, McNally had already told me it was saweet, but not that it was a vast improvement over the older model. Cutting to the chase, I’m blown away by both! i was expecting this, not a vast improvement from VRII over the VR version
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 14 2009, 12:29 PM
|
|
wrong interpretation..  .. i guess the D3s & 70200VII combo is something..
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 14 2009, 03:30 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Cwz90 @ Nov 14 2009, 02:17 PM) thanks any other useful tips for a newbie like me??? the manual.. thats the treasure..
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 14 2009, 04:34 PM
|
|
QUOTE(maxh3h3 @ Nov 14 2009, 04:13 PM) does the 50mm front rotate during AF? anyone can tell ? I tried the lens but i m not sure about this the focusing ring does rotate (50mm 1.8D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 14 2009, 05:19 PM
|
|
QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Nov 14 2009, 04:58 PM) ok guy..wanna ask If i qant to buy lens from online shop(other country) Are you recommand it? check the seller validity and trusted or not
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 14 2009, 11:40 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mybiebie @ Nov 14 2009, 11:13 PM) my dream wide angle tokina 11-16 f2.8..but hav to upgrade my d60 first. the tokina 116 is wide.. i dont feel any different 11mm from the tokina and 10mm (10-20mm) sigma.. the lens is sharp, quite different from the sigma 10-20.. less distortion on the tokina too.. got 2.8 aperture too..  i nearly bought a nikkor 14-24mm but it wont be wide enough on DX body..
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 15 2009, 01:19 AM
|
|
QUOTE(dukunet @ Nov 15 2009, 12:40 AM) Added on November 15, 2009, 12:43 ammy 2-days old AF 50mm f1.8 front didn't rotate... confirm... test it just now.... dunno about f1.4 tho... it will rotate if ur body got built in motor, AF. wont rotate if MF.. LOL any lens wont rotate if MF
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 15 2009, 07:35 PM
|
|
QUOTE(tun @ Nov 15 2009, 05:44 PM) maybe my school 1 form5 guy d60 + 35mm + 70-300mm semua bapa bayar,syok nia no wonder so many kids nowaday owns a dslr.. its a fashion oledi.. dem..
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 15 2009, 08:06 PM
|
|
QUOTE(faiz92 @ Nov 15 2009, 07:39 PM) I also taking spm lahhh =D good luck firdaus =D  My school got one guy name Luke , form 5, use 5D MARK II , 17-40 F4L , 70-200 F2.8L , 135 F2L with his two 580EX HAHAHA. he is richh mannn like that ar, kalau gambar still like crap, dont know what to say lah..
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 15 2009, 09:17 PM
|
|
QUOTE(HiroBoroi @ Nov 15 2009, 08:35 PM) I'll call your crap and raise you a "shiny turd". » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «  good ol'days
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 15 2009, 09:22 PM
|
|
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 15 2009, 09:20 PM) I feel dizzy just looking at the pic.. It's crazy how much the paid for it  look carefully.. art
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 15 2009, 11:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE(HiroBoroi @ Nov 15 2009, 10:20 PM) If you look carefully at the 12 artsy pics ... you will see that ... none of them got bokeh!! Ha ha.  typical normal everyday silhouette pun dapat
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 16 2009, 02:24 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Freezefrost @ Nov 16 2009, 01:13 AM) why 99 cent pic can sell for few million? @.@ which one is 99cent?
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 16 2009, 01:42 PM
|
|
QUOTE(faiz92 @ Nov 16 2009, 01:09 PM) YEAH ! and for them , they dont need camera bag! because they just want to show off. Anyways, its normal to use flash outdoor , to highlight details ?  all i see is they bouce the flash to the sky... wth..
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 16 2009, 02:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(faiz92 @ Nov 16 2009, 02:15 PM) I lol-ed reading this! I sometimes dont understand why they love to hang their camera rather than put it inside their bag.  tourist style
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 16 2009, 06:36 PM
|
|
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Nov 16 2009, 06:10 PM) since digital camera tech came, kids can afford to take more pics(no film) since more kids r getting digicams, digicams r getting too common since digicams r too common, rich kids get dslr to stand out since Nikon started the trend of budget dslrs with D40, more kids r getting dslr to stand out too since dslr r getting common too, whats next? cheaper D3 i hope  cant imagine a group of kids got D3 hang on their neck, walking around with kit lens.. This post has been edited by jsc_tidus: Nov 16 2009, 06:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 16 2009, 06:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Nov 16 2009, 06:52 PM) there many difference them with us... we might can use in M mode..while they..huh? i have 1 friend in myspace... he publish 1 picture..he say he take it with his slr.. but when i ask him about exif data..he say..."ape tu weyh?" "EXIT DOOR ke?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
jsc_tidus
|
Nov 16 2009, 07:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(project-o @ Nov 16 2009, 06:56 PM) 55-200 as a primary lens is ok but it depends on what they shoot. I have a friend who is a wedding photographer and he uses 70-200 IS USM for practically everything. Maybe different people have different styles and different ways to use the lens. Some like super wide...others may not like. he must have a UWA lens too.. if not, hell tight lah all shots..
|
|
|
|
|