Been doing squats recently and up till now, have always been using the squat machine typically found in most gyms. Reason I use it is because it has the cushions for my back which help keep my back straight and aligned as well as the ability to change weights quickly, just select a plate, insert pin and go. Been semi-afraid of using the free weights and squat rack for fear of hurting myself with bad form or maybe toppling over (lol).

But here's the question, which is better? I've read that the barbell and squat rack is better since you utilize more muscle groups whilst balancing the bar on your traps compared to the squat machine where i don't have to worry about it that much. Anyone used both and noticed a difference? Or are they both more or less the same and work the same muscle groups?

Yep therein is the reason why I asked the question in the first place. My goal is to not just isolate the quads. Squats are a compound exercise meant to work major muscle groups. If i wanted to work on just my lower body alone i'd use the leg press machine and other isolation machines. I do squats as a full body workout so to speak. (Having nice quads is a big plus)

Darklight79 said "gain pure muscle mass" but he never specified only on my legs or all over? "if just purely strength is your goal, the free weight squats is your only option" also not very the clear (sry). Strength in my thighs or all over? I'm looking for balanced workout + body fat reduction so I'm aiming for the "all over" option.

Will using the machine (squat machine or Smith) be isolating only my thighs and ass or will it be also working the same supportive muscles (back, abs) that will be worked by using free weights instead? (More specific rewording of my original question )

edit: NVM, found my answer in an old post on the bb.com forums. Guess I have to use the squat rack and a barbell. Balance and form are important for a beginner.

thx for the replies so far though, very informative.

This post has been edited by Muffins: Sep 1 2009, 05:25 PM