just a word of caution about the impending surplus of medical personnel....
the assumption is that the 'poorly trained' ones will be the ones who will fall by the wayside....
in real life, that is not necessarily the case....
what is the definition of a 'good' doctor?....
it varies depending who is looking....
to the patient, a good doctor is one who is nice, listens, agrees with the patient, gives sick leaves, makes them well fast, etc....not necessarily the competent one....
to a private hospital, it is one who orders the most investigations, admits the most patients, and do the most procedures....doesn't matter whether indicated or not....
to the gov administrator, it is one who agrees to be posted to where ever, without protest....doesn't matter if he/she knows nuts....
therefore, it is possible for a well trained, competent, and empathic doctor to be rejected because he scolds recalcitrant patients, does not do unnecessary tests/procedures, and wants to live with his ageing parents in the cities....
fact is, even now, some of the most successful gps are those who trained from dubious unis, performed badly while in compulsory gov service, but loved by patients because he seems to do miracles making patients recover from urti in record time....
anyone can guess how/why?.....
