And 18-105VR is quite sharp
Nikon D90 v4, First DSLR with HD video recording
Nikon D90 v4, First DSLR with HD video recording
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 11:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
18-105VR is way better than Sigma 18-200.
And 18-105VR is quite sharp |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 06:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 10:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(danialfarhan @ Sep 23 2009, 09:36 PM) just bought mine at foto selangor Pretty normal. Previous buyer, not interested in the kit lens. mine is kit set but they give me body box and lense not in the kit box normal kah? Left the lens there, so the shop owner bundle with D90 body set only. So nothing to worry about. It's still under Nikon Malaysia |
|
|
Sep 23 2009, 11:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2009, 08:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(yuenzhi @ Sep 24 2009, 01:34 AM) thank you everybody that gave review on 18-105. really looking forward to d90 !! can i ask another ques ? anybody can do a review of 16-85 nikkor lens. apparently its highly rated, better than 18-105. thanks in advance 16-85 is way better and sharper. But price is not cheap. 2k+QUOTE(noobie1 @ Sep 24 2009, 02:02 AM) Comparing a proton with ferrari ? QUOTE(Isepunye @ Sep 24 2009, 08:01 AM) QUOTE 35mm f/1.8 is nothing if you play 35mm f/2 before |
|
|
Sep 24 2009, 08:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 24 2009, 09:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2009, 11:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2009, 02:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2009, 10:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Sep 26 2009, 05:59 PM) RTFM !! If you know nothing, just STFU QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Sep 26 2009, 06:45 PM) RTFM !! QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Sep 26 2009, 07:00 PM) then??set it a side(without attach to body) and press the shutter or using the wireless device, sb-600 will auto flash? RTFM !! QUOTE(Isepunye @ Sep 26 2009, 07:17 PM) Can. Use Cactus PT-04. |
|
|
Sep 27 2009, 02:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
^
Some photos seems senget. Or is it my eyes ? |
|
|
Sep 27 2009, 02:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
^
RM 3k. |
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 12:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
Good night world
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 02:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
^
Comparing original with 3rd party ? |
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 05:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Sep 28 2009, 05:03 PM) LOL Expensive doesn't mean good but cheap confirm not as good as expensive stuff ini orang kaya sedang bercakap ni~~ but u still losing money after u sold for 2nd.. expensive doesnt mean good!! QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Sep 28 2009, 05:50 PM) but at least is depend on budget and the quality which satisfied u.. furthermore, price not always equal to its value...as for original mayb they over value it due to BRAND, commercial etc etc.. y pay more? LOL.. I never trust 3rd party item especially flash and battery grip. Lens still ok for that. |
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 06:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Sep 28 2009, 06:04 PM) LOL..thats for your POV..but i believe expensive stuff still got their faulty and depends on ur luck though.. Not my POV. Been there and saw lots of friends already become the victim.And seriously, I feel you're too new to all this and maybe you should try out before even voice out. |
|
|
Sep 29 2009, 07:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(MX510 @ Sep 29 2009, 04:55 AM) Nikkor 14-24 |
|
|
Sep 29 2009, 11:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(Sp00kY @ Sep 29 2009, 08:29 AM) Nothing beats Nikkor 14-24 QUOTE(Hongraphics @ Sep 29 2009, 09:49 AM) Nothing beats Nikkor 14-24 QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Sep 29 2009, 09:55 AM) just unmount the lens and press shutter button? Nothing beats Nikkor 14-24 Added on September 29, 2009, 9:56 am yea..that is 1 hell of a superb lens...retails for around rm3k if not mistaken... on street price only RM 2,3xx |
|
|
Sep 29 2009, 05:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(edtan5 @ Sep 29 2009, 02:42 PM) seconded for D90 TT or group shooting 10-24 is kinda overpriced yup, i agree too. but the range is a little short. alternative can be nikor 10-24mm imo, there is no siggy 10-22mm correct? closest is sigma 10-20mm? yeah, 14-24mm seems to be the best UWA so far <-imo but having 14-24mm on a APS-C sensor cam is not really wide Yeap. Sigma 10-20. Constant aperture version available soon. 14-24 is for FF. If crop camera, Tokina 11-16 still my vote. If you want super duper wide on FF, get Sigma 12-24 QUOTE(Sp00kY @ Sep 29 2009, 03:03 PM) i think its RM2k++ isnt it Sigma 10-20 is rubbish. Distortion is ugly. Just my 2cent..... nikkor 14-24 is superb on FF.. i dun like sigma EX finishing...feels cheap |
|
|
Sep 29 2009, 07:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Sep 29 2009, 06:23 PM) This is not. Rich people toy = Ferrari, Lambo and etc. p/s : Most of your post kinda more to spam. QUOTE(MX510 @ Sep 29 2009, 06:29 PM) Send back to their local warranty. For tamron is by futuromic. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0583sec
0.68
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 05:34 AM |