Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

News ISPs should pay no mind to the (bandwidth) cap, 500GB cost AUD$75(RM220)Email this to TM

views
     
TShmmm906
post Aug 28 2009, 02:13 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Aug 28 2009, 02:01 PM)
Many reasonable people agree that these ISPs are not able to provide unlimited bandwidth. We recognise that.

But what upsets many users is that, instead of creating different packages to cater to different segments like casual and heavy downloaders, instead they bundle us all together, then they cap us after we reach a certain bandiwdth cap (which seems to be 10gb for streamyx which is ridiculously low).

How can the bandwidth cap be only 10gb? How exactly is this considered a heavy downloader that they set is to 10gb o_O;

Another problem is throttling. It discriminately targets p2p. They don't let us use p2p at all. Nevermind the bandwidth cap, they will just throttle any p2p traffic ..... How is that fair? Why bother getting a better broadband speed if we can't use p2p?

Probably the biggest is dropped packets. How can the drop packets be so damn high? For example notice that you download something, and just when it's about to finish download, suddenly it stops and the file is corrupted. This is due to dropped packets etc doh.gif it's happened to me more then a few times so i am forced to re-download again.

Latency is also crap because of poor routing.

The download and upload speed we get is usually not even 80% of the advertised speed.
In summary,ok if they want to set a bandwidth cap fine, as long as they make a few different packages one of which would be true highspeed broadband with unlimited bandwidth ( or a very large cap like 200-300gb or something).

Also don't discriminate against P2P. As long as we are below our bandwidth usage, don't mess with P2p doh.gif

Fix too many dropped packets, also provide better routing cause latency sucks.

*
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/27228/127/

To improve broadband speeds, don't fiberise, optimise
by Stuart Corner
Wednesday, 26 August 2009

The local head of wide area network optimisation specialist, Riverbed Technology, has delivered a stinging attack on the government's National Broadband Network project claiming end users are unlikely to see real benefits simply from fatter pipes and that the performance of existing broadband services could be greatly improved by widespread deployment of wide area network optimisation technologies.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by hmmm906: Aug 28 2009, 02:15 PM
Moogle Stiltzkin
post Aug 28 2009, 03:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,465 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
bruce.gif

This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jul 14 2017, 07:52 PM
TShmmm906
post Aug 28 2009, 04:36 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Aug 28 2009, 03:44 PM)
hmmm906 @  are you saying the incomplete download and dropped packets is becaue tmnut is using this riverbed technology? Explain doh.gif
*
No. I mean they need network optimisation.
Moogle Stiltzkin
post Aug 28 2009, 04:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,465 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
bruce.gif

This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jul 14 2017, 07:58 PM
andrew9292
post Aug 28 2009, 08:49 PM

-/Livin' On A Prayer/-
*****
Senior Member
955 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Petaling Jaya


QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Aug 28 2009, 04:37 PM)
Their routing is so shoddy so how?

I seriously doubt they have the personnel competent enough for optimization. So their only solution is to throttle and hope for the best -.-;
*
They have, if not why those corporate buildings, factories, offices using SOHO or business packages can get such great speed?
They have and they can do it, but.......it's not available to us.......


robertngo
post Aug 28 2009, 09:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Aug 28 2009, 04:37 PM)
Their routing is so shoddy so how?

I seriously doubt they have the personnel competent enough for optimization. So their only solution is to throttle and hope for the best -.-;
*
well the riverbed wan optimization will be great for http tranffic, caching popular site will allow much better utilization of tmnut limited international line, but stuff like gaming i dont believe will gain much speed on this.


SUSautoman5891
post Mar 28 2010, 05:52 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


bump for exposure
ahtung79
post Mar 28 2010, 07:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
76 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(andrew9292 @ Aug 28 2009, 08:49 PM)
They have, if not why those corporate buildings, factories, offices using SOHO or business packages can get such great speed?
They have and they can do it, but.......it's not available to us.......
*
name me 10...hmmm no need 10 laaa, only one enuff...engineer/consultant/expert in TM, which i guarantee already have the ccie (or wutever highest industry cert), that really have experience managing (with hands-on) other public broadband network (other successful ISP) prior to TM...

for me, for this kinda job, u really need a few experts WITH same industry experience working together with internal TM engineers...

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0176sec    0.36    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 10:47 PM