QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Aug 27 2009, 10:18 AM)
arthurlwf,
I have been watching lecture on ancient China history about 2,000 years ago. As far as I can tell, NOTHING changes as far as what make people happy or not.
We are still asking the SAME question and having the SAME problem.
We STILL spend TOO MUCH TIME on worry about dying as opposed to living.
If you are HAPPY, life is GREAT. If not, why does anything matter??
Dreamer
Dreamer101,
This topic is not about making people happy or not. And there is no point talking about dying only.
It's more towards to understanding our world as mankind based on the information that we had.
And someone may possibly spur a new theory out.... or provide a new information...
Added on August 27, 2009, 11:00 amQUOTE(+3kk! @ Aug 27 2009, 09:17 AM)
your points on humanity are bias and rather lack of understanding
- economics is based on domestic "value", this value is calculated into the g.d.p but its superficial. thus you see inflation going higher and higher by the year, the value is precieved value based on human perception of product and services. we wont die if the economy dies, but with a slump it will take away lifestyles not the human race.
- human population is always increasing due to lack of competitors to a race, however the population is mostly condensed in low HDI areas. thus life expectancy of those people wont be that high.
- diesease, the welfare and life expectancy of the whole human race is increasing. there are cancers and so on but on a overall humans are better off now then a decade ago. its actually one of the issues of governments now.
- space is overhyped, we are taking only baby steps.
automation and technlogy, it is increasing and lifechanging. but nothing will lead the human race somewhere yet. mind you gps is actually old tech.
where humans will be heading? nothing significant, we dont have the tech to populate the moon, or even fully understand the human brain.
Agree on your point of the economics view, and you might be interested on this website on the root cause of inflation
http://sciencehouse.blogspot.com/2006/10/f...anking-and.html» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Fractional Reserve Banking and Inflation
In a comment to a previous post, the question of why there is inflation arose. Being a complete neophyte in economics, I began to think about this question. Along the way, I discovered some very interesting things about how the monetary system works. I'm not sure if I can answer the question correctly but here is my unqualified answer.
The main mechanism behind inflation seems to be what is known as fractional reserve banking. Here by mechanism, I don't mean what economic factors drive inflation, but simply how does extra money get into the economy. When you get a bank loan, they don't dig into their vault and give you the money. Instead, they simply put those dollars into your bank account. The money is basically created out of thin air. All the bank is required to do is to make sure that they have enough reserves to cover some fraction of their loans. It's a complicated formula but it amounts to something like ten to fifteen percent. Each night, the banks must balance their books and they partially do this by borrowing money from the US Federal Reserve which lends at the Fed rate. In that way the Fed can influence the money supply in the economy. The amazing thing about this system is that in principle the money supply could be any size. When money is lent to you and you buy something from someone else, they can deposit that money back into the bank which can then be lent out again while only keeping ten percent in reserve.
So, when interest rates are low, the money supply expands and we get inflation or a bubble. When interest rates increase, the money supply can shrink and then we can have a slowdown in the economy, a recession or a bursting of a bubble (as we are experiencing now in real estate). If the money supply was completely static then if the economy grew we would experience deflation. (This is happening in some sectors like electronics and food where the cost of production is decreasing faster than inflation.) The problem with deflation is that people then tend to wait before they buy things and that can retard economic growth. So, the Fed tries to engineer a small amount of inflation to keep things going. When the economy is too heated then it raises the rate slightly to keep it in check, which is what the Fed has done for the past two years.
I think one of the reasons why inflation has been relatively benign these past few years even with low interest rates is that the extra cash has been used to fuel the internet bubble followed by the real estate bubble and also our savings rate is so low that banks don't have enough reserve to further inflate the money supply. However, just to make sure I end on a gloomy note, Nouriel Roubini is predicting a recession in 2007 triggered by the bursting of the housing bubble. So interest rates may actually be coming down again.
May I ask what is the correlation between HDI & Human Population?
Most country under low HDI are Africa country, and highest HDI are America & Australia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UN_Human...Report_2008.svgIn terms of life expectancy, US, UK, France & Australia have the highest point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Life_Exp...ld_Factbook.pngIn terms of population density, US, China & India have the highest point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Countrie...ion_density.svgTherefore, the population is growing at an alarming rate, don't you think so?
It's true that we're taking a baby steps to Space Frontier, and at least the engine has started to move since many years ago to understand space.
This post has been edited by arthurlwf: Aug 27 2009, 11:06 AM