Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Science Where is Mankind Heading Towards To..., Prosperity? Extinction? Space? Matrix?

views
     
TSarthurlwf
post Aug 26 2009, 04:31 PM, updated 17y ago

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


With the many on-going events happening for mankind, where are we heading towards to?

Economic View
- World economy slump in year 2008
- US and many countries pour $$$ to the market like water
- Inflation is rising as time passes

Human Population View
- Based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_population, there are 6.707 billion people as per 1 Jul 2008.
- The only issue that may trigger is Malthusian catastrophe.

Earth View
- More disaster happening in recent year (e.g. Earthquake, Tsunami, Typhoon)
- The greenhouse effect is causing global warming
- As we dive to the deepest earth surface, we are uncovering more unique life species
- As we explore to the deepest of the jungle, we are playing with unknown viruses

Disease View
- Global pandemic disease like H1N1, HIV, SARS
- There are more cancer problem happening in mankind

Space Frontier View
- NASA intend to launch a scout mission to Mars in year 2013. http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/f...reMissions.html
- Mankind can start to travel to space at a cost of USD 200k via Virgin Galactic. And Sir Richard is going to make this affordable for thousands of people to experience space for themself.
http://www.virgingalactic.com/htmlsite/faq...0Ticket&src=386

Automation
- Robotic technology is growing rapidly
- The new generation will be IT literate and thus automation is a must for the new generation.
- GPS allow mankind to go anywhere easily with a GPS device
- More games are build which the new generation are absorb to the New Digital World

Feel free to add more points with facts or reasons

Looking at the information, one thing is for sure:
1) Earth is getting sick
2) Human needs a new alternative method to grow and live (e.g. Matrix, or Space Exploration)

This post has been edited by arthurlwf: Aug 26 2009, 06:25 PM
teongpeng
post Aug 26 2009, 04:38 PM

Justified and Ancient
*******
Senior Member
2,003 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


spiritual pursuits next
TSarthurlwf
post Aug 26 2009, 04:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(teongpeng @ Aug 26 2009, 04:38 PM)
spiritual pursuits next
*
Please back up your point/thoughts with some facts

This post has been edited by arthurlwf: Aug 26 2009, 05:01 PM
ddemonn
post Aug 26 2009, 04:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
111 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(teongpeng @ Aug 26 2009, 04:38 PM)
spiritual pursuits next
*
pwned
g_pentium
post Aug 26 2009, 09:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
i've seen some documentaries,that we are in search for a new home.
mars are suitable for human to strive.as suggested by some undisclosed parties.but clueless on the technologies to get us there and strive,a distant dream at the moment,but there are progress,im sure.
Xepz
post Aug 27 2009, 12:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


The sooner this earth and all its cut throat ways die, the better. I'm all for it. The sooner the better.

All religious texts talk of some apocalypse and only a few worthy survive, the rest go into oblivion. Take for example, Noahs Ark....

And you know what wise men say...History Repeats Itself.

And history has ALWAYS repeated itself.

This post has been edited by Xepz: Aug 27 2009, 12:17 AM
ZeratoS
post Aug 27 2009, 02:58 AM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


We'll have kicked the bucket by the time the apocalypse comes mate.

But on a more serious note ;
As Xepz put it, repetition will occur. It will come to the point whereby everything just collapses into one mass of nothing, and humans will have to start again from scratch. Its been going on, and will happen again eventually. Much like the recession/boom concept, things follow a sine graph with its ups and downs.

Humans are destroying themselves you know, and eventually we will all have to start over. At least that is what I believe.
Mesosmagnet
post Aug 27 2009, 04:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
201 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
Matrix? No idea on that note.
Space exploration? Maybe, but at most it will probably be another noah's ark episode.. just a more technologically advanced one.

Most likely to happen:
A few key humans will be sent up into space. And a nuclear Armageddon will take place (by humans choice to clean up the world). And then when everything is settled, no more nuclear radiation and stuff, those key people will come back down to earth and re-populate the land. It will probably be soon, I'm sure the government has a plan like this stashed away somewhere in-case of an emergency.

Besides that, there is currently no other way to save the human race. Migrating to another planet is not a very logical method, as space travel costs billions, and to get another PLANET ready for human AND other species to live on will take at least as long as it took for humans to finally make it up into space. We would have to know ALOT about another planet before we even think of inhabiting another planet. We humans do not even know enough about our own planet, so this option would only be applicable in maybe a thousand years time.

Other alternatives? Everyone ABANDONS technology. We go back to the stone age, to let mother earth repair herself. OR we can find a way to generate 100% clean energy. And obviously we would have to find a way to properly dispose of our waste products.

Just my 2 cents.
+3kk!
post Aug 27 2009, 09:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,275 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(arthurlwf @ Aug 26 2009, 04:31 PM)
With the many on-going events happening for mankind, where are we heading towards to?

Economic View
- World economy slump in year 2008
- US and many countries pour $$$ to the market like water
- Inflation is rising as time passes

Human Population View
- Based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_population, there are 6.707 billion people as per 1 Jul 2008.
- The only issue that may trigger is Malthusian catastrophe.

Earth View
- More disaster happening in recent year (e.g. Earthquake, Tsunami, Typhoon)
- The greenhouse effect is causing global warming
- As we dive to the deepest earth surface, we are uncovering more unique life species
- As we explore to the deepest of the jungle, we are playing with unknown viruses

Disease View
- Global pandemic disease like H1N1, HIV, SARS
- There are more cancer problem happening in mankind

Space Frontier View
- NASA intend to launch a scout mission to Mars in year 2013. http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/f...reMissions.html
- Mankind can start to travel to space at a cost of USD 200k via Virgin Galactic. And Sir Richard is going to make this affordable for thousands of people to experience space for themself.
http://www.virgingalactic.com/htmlsite/faq...0Ticket&src=386

Automation
- Robotic technology is growing rapidly
- The new generation will be IT literate and thus automation is a must for the new generation.
- GPS allow mankind to go anywhere easily with a GPS device
- More games are build which the new generation are absorb to the New Digital World

Feel free to add more points with facts or reasons

Looking at the information, one thing is for sure:
1) Earth is getting sick
2) Human needs a new alternative method to grow and live (e.g. Matrix, or Space Exploration)
*
your points on humanity are bias and rather lack of understanding

- economics is based on domestic "value", this value is calculated into the g.d.p but its superficial. thus you see inflation going higher and higher by the year, the value is precieved value based on human perception of product and services. we wont die if the economy dies, but with a slump it will take away lifestyles not the human race.

- human population is always increasing due to lack of competitors to a race, however the population is mostly condensed in low HDI areas. thus life expectancy of those people wont be that high.

- diesease, the welfare and life expectancy of the whole human race is increasing. there are cancers and so on but on a overall humans are better off now then a decade ago. its actually one of the issues of governments now.

- space is overhyped, we are taking only baby steps.

automation and technlogy, it is increasing and lifechanging. but nothing will lead the human race somewhere yet. mind you gps is actually old tech.

where humans will be heading? nothing significant, we dont have the tech to populate the moon, or even fully understand the human brain.

This post has been edited by +3kk!: Aug 27 2009, 09:19 AM
TSarthurlwf
post Aug 27 2009, 10:06 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(g_pentium @ Aug 26 2009, 09:06 PM)
i've seen some documentaries,that we are in search for a new home.
mars are suitable for human to strive.as suggested by some undisclosed parties.but clueless on the technologies to get us there and strive,a distant dream at the moment,but there are progress,im sure.
*
True, just that we're not sure what kind of home we're end up with... maybe...
1) Hell in earth as Ozone had depleted
2) Cyberworld like the matrix
3) Migrate to other planets
etc...
C-Note
post Aug 27 2009, 10:08 AM

starry starry night
*******
Senior Member
3,037 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: 6-feet under


every single thing in this world is heading to one direction and that is extinction. no such thing as eternity. theres always an expiry date for anythg and everythg. just a matter of time
TSarthurlwf
post Aug 27 2009, 10:16 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(ZeratoS @ Aug 27 2009, 02:58 AM)
We'll have kicked the bucket by the time the apocalypse comes mate.

But on a more serious note ;
As Xepz put it, repetition will occur. It will come to the point whereby everything just collapses into one mass of nothing, and humans will have to start again from scratch. Its been going on, and will happen again eventually. Much like the recession/boom concept, things follow a sine graph with its ups and downs.

Humans are destroying themselves you know, and eventually we will all have to start over. At least that is what I believe.
*
ZeratoS & Xepz

So far the only concrete event on Mankind history to repeat itself is war & economy cycles
And there is no concrete evidence that state everything will collapses into one mass of nothing

Hmm... not sure whether you're referring to this point stated in Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risks_to_civi...nd_planet_Earth
(This articles stated very comprehensive on the risk that can possible affect mankind destruction, one example is the possible of Large Hadron Collider)

This post has been edited by arthurlwf: Aug 27 2009, 10:27 AM
dreamer101
post Aug 27 2009, 10:18 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(arthurlwf @ Aug 26 2009, 04:31 PM)

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
arthurlwf,

I have been watching lecture on ancient China history about 2,000 years ago. As far as I can tell, NOTHING changes as far as what make people happy or not.

We are still asking the SAME question and having the SAME problem.

We STILL spend TOO MUCH TIME on worry about dying as opposed to living.

If you are HAPPY, life is GREAT. If not, why does anything matter??

Dreamer
anthrax33
post Aug 27 2009, 10:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
244 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


i believe we wont really be extinct
unless someone have a brilliant idea of mass nuking.
humans are quite adaptable to their environments.
but we are not immune to dramatic population decrease.

our real problem now is energy
our current population is addicted to fossil fuel.
unless some new alternative energy is found, we may have a world war 3 in the near future which will be focused on fossil fuel.
and if after that we still dont have the solution,
our population will decrease dramatically to less than 1 billion.
because thats how much humans the earth can really sustain.
imagine, we have only around 3 billion people in the 60's
our population doubled in a course of only 40 years because of advancement of agriculture and hypermarkets.
fossil fuels played a very important role and made agriculture much more efficient (harvesting & transport) and without it or any replacement of it, we cant grow food like we do today.
and hypermarkets will not be able to supply food to cities.

This post has been edited by anthrax33: Aug 27 2009, 10:33 AM
TSarthurlwf
post Aug 27 2009, 10:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Aug 27 2009, 10:18 AM)
arthurlwf,

I have been watching lecture on ancient China history about 2,000 years ago.  As far as I can tell, NOTHING changes as far as what make people happy or not.

We are still asking the SAME question and having the SAME problem.

We STILL spend TOO MUCH TIME on worry about dying as opposed to living.

If you are HAPPY, life is GREAT.  If not, why does anything matter??

Dreamer
*
Dreamer101,

This topic is not about making people happy or not. And there is no point talking about dying only.
It's more towards to understanding our world as mankind based on the information that we had.
And someone may possibly spur a new theory out.... or provide a new information...


Added on August 27, 2009, 11:00 am
QUOTE(+3kk! @ Aug 27 2009, 09:17 AM)
your points on humanity are bias and rather lack of understanding

- economics is based on domestic "value", this value is calculated into the g.d.p but its superficial. thus you see inflation going higher and higher by the year, the value is precieved value based on human perception of product and services. we wont die if the economy dies, but with a slump it will take away lifestyles not the human race.

- human population is always increasing due to lack of competitors to a race, however the population is mostly condensed in low HDI areas. thus life expectancy of those people wont be that high.

- diesease, the welfare and life expectancy of the whole human race is increasing. there are cancers and so on but on a overall humans are better off now then a decade ago. its actually one of the issues of governments now.

- space is overhyped, we are taking only baby steps.

automation and technlogy, it is increasing and lifechanging. but nothing will lead the human race somewhere yet. mind you gps is actually old tech.

where humans will be heading? nothing significant, we dont have the tech to populate the moon, or even fully understand the human brain.
*
Agree on your point of the economics view, and you might be interested on this website on the root cause of inflation
http://sciencehouse.blogspot.com/2006/10/f...anking-and.html

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


May I ask what is the correlation between HDI & Human Population?
Most country under low HDI are Africa country, and highest HDI are America & Australia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UN_Human...Report_2008.svg
In terms of life expectancy, US, UK, France & Australia have the highest point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Life_Exp...ld_Factbook.png
In terms of population density, US, China & India have the highest point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Countrie...ion_density.svg
Therefore, the population is growing at an alarming rate, don't you think so?

It's true that we're taking a baby steps to Space Frontier, and at least the engine has started to move since many years ago to understand space.

This post has been edited by arthurlwf: Aug 27 2009, 11:06 AM
+3kk!
post Aug 27 2009, 01:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,275 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(arthurlwf @ Aug 27 2009, 10:37 AM)


Agree on your point of the economics view, and you might be interested on this website on the root cause of inflation
http://sciencehouse.blogspot.com/2006/10/f...anking-and.html


May I ask what is the correlation between HDI & Human Population?
Most country under low HDI are Africa country, and highest HDI are America & Australia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UN_Human...Report_2008.svg
In terms of life expectancy, US, UK, France & Australia have the highest point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Life_Exp...ld_Factbook.png
In terms of population density, US, China & India have the highest point.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Countrie...ion_density.svg
Therefore, the population is growing at an alarming rate, don't you think so?

It's true that we're taking a baby steps to Space Frontier, and at least the engine has started to move since many years ago to understand space.
*
that guy got confused between sub prime and inflation, lol. inflation is cause by people and demand and supply, simple as that. his sub prime was about bonds, its not as simple as he makes it to be, and the money doesnt come from thin air.

HDI calculates a number of things, its a summerised calculatioin on how good you are. its not the most accurate thing in the world but its what we got. HDI also takes life expectancy into account.

the correlation comes with life expectancy, high population nations have low life expectancy however high life expectancy nations have got low birth rates. thus if one just cross reference the data you can understand that while the human race is increasing in numbers, a lot of these people would die too.

the space thing starting again however i doubt it would be anything significant based on our current generation. basically we are trapped on this earth

TSarthurlwf
post Aug 27 2009, 02:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(+3kk! @ Aug 27 2009, 01:23 PM)
that guy got confused between sub prime and inflation, lol. inflation is cause by people and demand and supply, simple as that. his sub prime was about bonds, its not as simple as he makes it to be, and the money doesnt come from thin air.

HDI calculates a number of things, its a summerised calculatioin on how good you are. its not the most accurate thing in the world but its what we got. HDI also takes life expectancy into account.

the correlation comes with life expectancy, high population nations have low life expectancy however high life expectancy nations have got low birth rates. thus if one just cross reference the data you can understand that while the human race is increasing in numbers, a lot of these people would die too.

the space thing starting again however i doubt it would be anything significant based on our current generation. basically we are trapped on this earth
*
Here is another articles for you to understand on how money is created from thin air.
http://ezinearticles.com/?How-Banks-Create...n-Air&id=921796
With your claim that money doesn't come from thin air, please back up your point with facts/information.

From your point,
1) High Population Nations -> Low Life Expectancy [This point contradict with the facts I've provided you earlier, e.g. US]
2) High Life Expectancy Nations -> Low Birth Rates [Might be true]

The space is not started again...
Do read this articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_exploration

Just look at Computer Technology, mankind has been evolved to use computers into their daily life in less than a decade duration...
Another example is mobile phone which incorporated into our daily life in less than a decade duration...


Added on August 27, 2009, 2:33 pm
QUOTE(anthrax33 @ Aug 27 2009, 10:30 AM)
i believe we wont really be extinct
unless someone have a brilliant idea of mass nuking.
humans are quite adaptable to their environments.
but we are not immune to dramatic population decrease.

our real problem now is energy
our current population is addicted to fossil fuel.
unless some new alternative energy is found, we may have a world war 3 in the near future which will be focused on fossil fuel.
and if after that we still dont have the solution,
our population will decrease dramatically to less than 1 billion.
because thats how much humans the earth can really sustain.
imagine, we have only around 3 billion people in the 60's
our population doubled in a course of only 40 years because of advancement of agriculture and hypermarkets.
fossil fuels played a very important role and made agriculture much more efficient (harvesting & transport) and without it or any replacement of it, we cant grow food like we do today.
and hypermarkets will not be able to supply food to cities.
*
True... our coming problem is energy... our dependency on fossil fuel is too great to the extend we may collapse if fossil fuel is fully used up.
Not sure what's the solution to this problem

This post has been edited by arthurlwf: Aug 27 2009, 02:33 PM
Xepz
post Aug 27 2009, 02:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(arthurlwf @ Aug 27 2009, 10:16 AM)
ZeratoS & Xepz

So far the only concrete event on Mankind history to repeat itself is war & economy cycles
And there is no concrete evidence that state everything will collapses into one mass of nothing

Hmm... not sure whether you're referring to this point stated in Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risks_to_civi...nd_planet_Earth
(This articles stated very comprehensive on the risk that can possible affect mankind destruction, one example is the possible of Large Hadron Collider)
*
Not just war and economic cycles, but even the climate and environment goes through cycles. That is why the ancients used the phoenix to symbolize death and rebirth.

Right now, there is enough evidence to suggest that global warming is not solely man made....NASA has acknowledged other solar system planets are warming up as well, over the past decade. The earth/solar system is currently going through some meteor/asteroid cloud. The sun has not given out sun spots for years, until recently. Honey bees are dying out. Frogs are dying out. Butterflies are dying out. On their own.

I personally believe mainstream science has covered up a lot of things and only "allow" small bits to the public. Unless you hunt for them, you won't find them. I won't post links here, but you can try searching for it - If you want. Also the mainstream news will never report such things.

One of my interests is history.

There is actually a lot of evidence of sunken ruined cities existing under the ocean bed.....past civilizations....And the implications are compelling.

What does this mean..... a lot of civilizations have come and gone in the past. We are brainwashed by the media to think we are the best civilization ever - not true. The ancient people knew A LOT more than us, and in many ways were MUCH more advanced than us, yet they died out too. Nothing suggests we won't go the same way....and I don't think it will be that long away as well.

The world may be headed for a bright glorious future, but not before a lot of upheavals and crisis take place. It is like a body detox....the bad comes before any good.

A lot of people will naturally brush this off because humans naturally don't want to listen to anything "bad." We are not hard wired to remember bad things. If I told you on September 10, 2001, that the next day, a couple of planes would slam into the WTC, you would have called me mad. biggrin.gif tongue.gif


rockets
post Aug 27 2009, 04:08 PM

No Recoil
****
Senior Member
509 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


"Several nations begin warring with one another for the last stores of fossil fuels, namely oil and uranium. Known as the Resource Wars, fighting begins in April of 2052 and continues until October 23rd, 2077. China invades Alaska in the winter of 2066, causing the United States to go to war with China and using Canadian resources to supply their war efforts, despite Canadian complaints. Eventually the US annexes Canada in February of 2076 and reclaims Alaska eleven months later. After years of conflict, on October 23rd, 2077, a global nuclear attack occurs. Nobody knows who strikes first, but in less than two hours most major cities are destroyed. The effects of the attack will not fade for the next 100 years. As a consequence, humanity lives in underground Vaults though some people affected by the radiation live topside."

I'd say we're headed this direction.
+3kk!
post Aug 27 2009, 06:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,275 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(arthurlwf @ Aug 27 2009, 02:17 PM)
Here is another articles for you to understand on how money is created from thin air.
http://ezinearticles.com/?How-Banks-Create...n-Air&id=921796
With your claim that money doesn't come from thin air, please back up your point with facts/information.

From your point,
1) High Population Nations -> Low Life Expectancy [This point contradict with the facts I've provided you earlier, e.g. US]
2) High Life Expectancy Nations -> Low Birth Rates [Might be true]

The space is not started again...
Do read this articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_exploration

Just look at Computer Technology, mankind has been evolved to use computers into their daily life in less than a decade duration...
Another example is mobile phone which incorporated into our daily life in less than a decade duration...


*
well no need to, you cant create money out of thin air. you can print it but the value doesnt come from thin air. why?

hyperinflation.

if you really want to fully understand how this wont work, look up monetary policies IS-LM diagrams and the keynesian cross. that alone would deter

now banks play around with money as much as they want, but the real key to this is the value of the money. even if you have a superficial 90k in the bank and the bank took that and send it somewher eelse its ok. mind you banks dont keep that much money on hand, they use something like a credit system.

again, there are more things to this then the sub prime and the money out of thin air . if its all about money from thin air we wont even be in this mess.

source and info,any marcoeconomics text book to learn about hyper inflation and monetary policy. and booms bust and bubbles of the american economy, specifically look up the first chap and the great bull run chap. of couse there are more to this, you need to grasp basic economics to even understand them. so if you really want to troll in it go take econs as your bachelor. sry mate no internet links, you have to go read books.

and on another note

america is the only country that has high hdi while having a high population. i clearly know that, but america aint the human population too.

high life expectancy countries, low birth rates are very true.

mars exploration well yea, you could quote tons of it. scientists have been trying to reach mars for years now, but will it have a profound impact on humanity? possible, will it be significant? hard to tell too many variables.

and lastly, computers were invented waaaaaaay back in the world war. the first video games were created somewhere that period, was on an osiloscope if i remembered right. intergrated into human scoiety for the past decade no. calculators are computers, we used them just didnt knwo thta they are a computer system. also computers are not as widely used as you think, and defo not worthy of "human intergration" tagline. just google how many people int he world uses computers you would get the answer.

This post has been edited by +3kk!: Aug 27 2009, 07:00 PM
rexis
post Aug 28 2009, 12:16 AM

*** 7-star status Old Bird ***
*******
Senior Member
3,590 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: nowhere


Great connection there TS has made.

Economic View
We are viewing everything in terms of numbers, and often we see invaluable things being weight like: profit made by chopping down the forest vs cost to turn the forest into a national park.

Human Population View
More an more human being working together turning Earth into a gigantic human nest that is only good for two creatures: human and cockroaches

Earth View
Despite all the gimmicks about saving the world, global warming, say no to plastic bags, green house gases, etc. We are sitting comfortable in an air conditioned room doing what we are busy at and couldn't care more about whether it is sunny or rainy outdoor.

Disease View
It is quite unlikely that a flu will wipe out the entire human race. Most deadly disease cause by the lack of physical challenge aka exercise. See below.

Automation
This is the part that link all the above together! No I am not talking about some terminator will blow your head off next morning. For the sake of automation, more and more human being are losing the actual ability to survive in real world.
- we survive by earning enough money to get the things we need(economic)
- we are sort of disconnected with our real environment and have been living in our own greenhouse, not many city folks able to survive in the wild or when all civilisation is lost, even walking under the hot sun for one whole afternoon is challenging for many human. (Earth)
- most sickness is somehow linked to extensive automation: car, remote control, personal computer, hand phone. Such as, high blood pressure, obesity, heart disease, etc. (disease)
And in the end, if some kind of disaster strike and sort of wipe out all the technology and civilisation, such as nuclear strike, solar storm or some bad luck fallen comet. Most will died due to lack of real survival skill because all they know is IT, accounting, financial, etc.

Space Frontier View
The Macross Frontier(space colony type mega space ship that have self contained eco system and a city for people to live on) style fantasy will take many centuries(if not millenniums) to achieve. I am sceptical about the possibilities that we will have a peace and prosperous period long enough for us to develop such a technology before we eventually destroyed ourselves.
ZeratoS
post Aug 29 2009, 03:45 AM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(arthurlwf @ Aug 27 2009, 10:16 AM)
ZeratoS & Xepz

So far the only concrete event on Mankind history to repeat itself is war & economy cycles
And there is no concrete evidence that state everything will collapses into one mass of nothing

Hmm... not sure whether you're referring to this point stated in Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risks_to_civi...nd_planet_Earth
(This articles stated very comprehensive on the risk that can possible affect mankind destruction, one example is the possible of Large Hadron Collider)
*
I didn't mean it literally, far from it to be honest. In a sense, there's only SO far mankind may advance don't you think? And after that, well..the climax ends and we just have the anticlimax. But I could be wrong you know.
TSarthurlwf
post Sep 19 2009, 07:57 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(ZeratoS @ Aug 29 2009, 03:45 AM)
I didn't mean it literally, far from it to be honest. In a sense, there's only SO far mankind may advance don't you think? And after that, well..the climax ends and we just have the anticlimax. But I could be wrong you know.
*
Interesting thought... mind to share with us an example of anticlimax in mankind history?
kekacang
post Sep 20 2009, 11:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
175 posts

Joined: May 2008
Extinction.... I could not think it, but if there is a war, human could extinct in this modern times. Why? Nowdays there is too many weapons that could lead human to extinction.

Peace, there will be not absolute peace. It will be there. Where there is the light, there will be shadow. Humans will always like that.

Human nowdays have less chances of survival as many new technology make them work-less. People in these days develop new syndrome, "big head" and "small body" like new generation alien. Exercise is treated like recreation, they do when they want it.




Hee-ho Hero
post Sep 23 2009, 05:14 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
44 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: Snow Kingdom


Propesrity? Hell no.
Extinction? Almost. Maybe the next 200 years or so.
Space? In progress.
Matrix? unsure.gif Yes..No? Whatever.

If you ask me, I'd say we're heading towards to creating a total pile of mess to live in. Our world is xxxxed up now and I don't see any sign of it moving backward from the point of no return.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0256sec    0.48    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 11:27 AM