QUOTE(kekacang @ Sep 20 2009, 11:14 PM)
Just to want ask a question. How do you all defines creative?
Is creative is like:
a) Leonardo da Vinci, a painter and many2 things, he also invent scissors?
b) Einstein guys? Know theory, and the one that superficial thoughts?
c) A man that creative, where they know how to survive?
If we could see, creative is practically seen or not?
All of the above are applicable. Creative could be a myriad of things, from just being different to think of more interesting ways to overcome a dilemma. In essense, to be creative is to not follow the stereotypical norm set by society. A key point lies with the word
difference, though different may not always mean good. Creative thought could be in the form of a man using nothing but a fork and a peanut to escape from a desert island, as far-fetched as that may sound. How many people could think it viable? Certainly not the masses.
No creative is such that we cannot see it. We can feel it, and agree that a person is creative if you want to call that visual presence.
Also, to the earlier debate, people flourish when they have their needs tended to, from an art and cultural standpoint. To be comfortable already, they seek alternative means to consuming their time in a productive manner. In periods of strife, I think we will see a rather stark contrast in what we define
creativity, as people are forced to think of various ways to survive. Both sides have their points no? It boils down to how we view the subject matter.
Add;
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Sep 20 2009, 10:09 PM)
Actually, the easier life is, the more time you have to
think. Suffering simply expands your perspectives and gives you more material, it doesn't make you more creative. Many who suffer are not creative at all. The problem is that priorities are not on thinking, but on self gratification. Being a leech of resource rather than using society's resources to give something back in return.
And to quote silverhawk's statement, I don't disagree with it. However, how many people actually make use of that opportunity to
think? Certainly the minority does so, as per the myriad of intelligent people debating here. Though I must say the computer and the
idiot box (ala TV) contribute towards the degeneration of intelligent thought. Entertainment is readily available yes, but if you have no form of entertainment available, you would certainly think of ways to cure the boredom.
This post has been edited by ZeratoS: Sep 21 2009, 04:29 AM