guys... if print size 4R, what is the ratio actually?
6:4 / 3:2 or what?
This post has been edited by alpha_company: Aug 25 2009, 01:37 AM
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V30!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Aug 25 2009, 01:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing   
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Aug 25 2009, 02:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing
|
normal 8r ratio is what?
|
|
|
Aug 25 2009, 12:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing
|
QUOTE(millenia3000 @ Aug 25 2009, 03:51 AM) thanks man  I'm a bit confused before with the normal 8R size because I need to crop it due to the different ratio from the usual 4R size (6x4 in) & native dslr 3:2 ratio. i found this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_phot...hic_print_sizes It turns out that it's called S8R..Super8R This post has been edited by alpha_company: Aug 25 2009, 12:31 PM |
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 01:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing
|
guys..the sony a850 out already ka? hehe
|
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 08:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing
|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « niceeeeenesss...  lucky ar u... where was that? what event?Added on August 29, 2009, 8:31 pm QUOTE(ryzan76 @ Aug 29 2009, 01:24 PM) can.....55200 and raynox... nice as always...macro king belalang tu berkata "ngam tak posing aku "  This post has been edited by alpha_company: Aug 29 2009, 08:32 PM |
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 09:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing
|
QUOTE(soulfly @ Aug 29 2009, 12:29 PM) http://www.artaphot.ch/dslrs/201-jpg-noise...00-and-dynax-7d from the tests...looks like the a500 wins in low noise at high iso beginning at iso800...good2..Looks like A500 has better NR algorithm for high ISO (at normal setting) compare to A700 and A900 .... look at the details! There's barely CA too! (look at A700 vs A500 sample). |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 04:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing
|
QUOTE(ianho @ Aug 31 2009, 02:11 PM) Am I the only 1 who thinks Sony is making their SLRs more n more like cartoon style. I mean, cmon maaaaan, I think most SLR enthusiasts would prefer more serious looking bodies in mainly black n not these fancy schmancy colours n textures on the bodies right? They should make the bodies look serious like the A900, A700, A200, A100 last time. All black n mean looking. to be honest u r not the only one..i wanna say something like that before but it looks like some are already set on buying the a5xx series and i dont wanna ruin the mood..hehe..In Singapore, they have shoulder straps, handstraps n everything in pink, florals, diamond bling blings n all man. Hehehe. At least The Curve got some for the ladies. i donno why sony makes the new dslr models like that...what the heck was goin on in their minds laa.. wonder how the A700 replacement model will look like..  thank goodness the a850 is targeted for above enthusiast level..if not maybe same colour scheme also what.. This post has been edited by alpha_company: Aug 31 2009, 04:32 PM |
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 10:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing
|
QUOTE(vandechrome @ Aug 31 2009, 08:17 PM) so that means whether buying a crystal bright or matte lcd wouldnt be a problem as long as we calibrate it..right? yup.. i got a friend asking me about buying an lcd too.. yes the crystal bright lcd looks nice because it's bright and contrasty but it could also effect the outcome of the colours...not sure if it can be corrected as easily as a matte lcd..what i found out is crystal bright lcds are more bright n contrasty than the normal matte one..is it this factor will not be a problem if i calibrate the monitor? Added on August 31, 2009, 10:24 pm QUOTE(ryzan76 @ Aug 31 2009, 08:08 PM) aku ada nampak seorang askar..... ooo..ini la bro ryzan the pornbug director?..hehehe » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by alpha_company: Aug 31 2009, 10:33 PM |
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 10:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing
|
QUOTE(vandechrome @ Aug 31 2009, 10:29 PM) so matte lcd should be better n safe right? Well, from what i can see i would say that a matte would be better for photos. The crystal bright produces eye candy colours imo although it might not be accurate enough.. what models do u have in mind? get the matte one la safe..better safe than sorry as the saying goes.. Added on August 31, 2009, 10:36 pm QUOTE(vandechrome @ Aug 31 2009, 10:35 PM) sudah pening mau pilih lcd..so alternative way...shopping lens lah! I 2nd that..hahahaha... This post has been edited by alpha_company: Aug 31 2009, 10:38 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0395sec
 0.54
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 07:32 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.