QUOTE(gizmo_pony @ Aug 18 2009, 08:01 PM)
now, my new phottix battery grip officially kiok ... going mad. haiyaaa... all the buttons are not working.
u got a lemon copy maybe..haha..Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V30!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Aug 18 2009, 08:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 21 2009, 07:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
|
|
|
Aug 26 2009, 11:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
soulfly is slowpoke...it has already been posted up long long time ago..
|
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 11:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
damn...im so tempted with the new low cost 2875 f2.8...which is only priced at 2.8k retail.... Sony is darn good at marketing.
|
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 11:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
not even out yet...shipping begins on november i think..lol..unless albnok works in Sony factory
|
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 11:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
is this a850 weather sealed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2009, 12:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
QUOTE(soulfly @ Aug 31 2009, 11:56 PM) a900 never officially marketed with weather seal, but it does survive in hardcore environment like one of the journalist for Dakar Rally experienced. rain, dust, sand, no prob. but dpreview says tht a900 has 'Environmental seals'...but not sure whether the a850 has the same kind of body seal, after all it's priced way cheaper than it's elder brother. Added on August 31, 2009, 11:58 pm F58AM is able to act as commander flash for wireless setup has more power output quickshift bounce (like a cobra head) multiple flash fire http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydslra900/ |
|
|
Sep 1 2009, 12:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
QUOTE(albnok @ Sep 1 2009, 12:32 AM) lwliam: In the context of a B Cam LOL! ahhh...albert did u ever try shooting under rain with ur a900? Oops...i got confused with the 2875 f2.8 which will start shipping in november. If I could choose only one APS-C camera, it might be the A700 still, for the controls. However, the A550 is very, very tempting. [b]AlphaBeta: The A850 starts shipping in September 2009. It still claims to be moisture-proof (but again, we'll leave it to the brave to test splash/dust.)[/B] hkhk: The cats' eyes would shrink if exposed to bright light for a long time... it's just a flash. finalfantasty: The F42 can be used off-camera as a wireless slave. The F58 can be used on-camera to trigger wireless slaves but only on the A700/A850/A900. |
|
|
Sep 1 2009, 06:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
speaking of nikon and sony WL flash?? ask me ahha..i have both lol!...i like nikon more...i can set my pop up flash to 0 power and only fire the wireless flash. So my picture would only be lit up with the wireless flash. On a sony..u cant..but i remember albnok told me u have to set the shutter speed and something else...
|
|
|
Sep 1 2009, 08:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
QUOTE(kev da man @ Sep 1 2009, 07:38 PM) sony? the onboard flash does not interrupt with the overall exposure, at least not on my a200. the pre-ADI sends out the information to the flashgun before the actual exposure is fired, so your onboard flash does not influence the final output, at least not in my shots. huh? i don get u man... the pop up flash will still fire a flash to ur subject. Making ur subject now with 2 lighting source (ur Wireless flash and ur pop up flash)....many ways can be done to overcome the flash from ur pop up flash eg like achew said..use 1/200 or higher/cover with exposed film or tissue. |
|
|
Sep 1 2009, 08:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
QUOTE(kev da man @ Sep 1 2009, 08:34 PM) according to what i shot, nopes. my pop up flash does not influence the end result. look at the shadows on the two images i've posted U still don understand wht im trying to say...from ur picture..yes i can see tht u r using wireless flash...and i can see 2 light sources...1 from your pop up flash...1 from ur f42.... Go try this...shoot something tht only has 1 source of light which is from ur f42, without covering ur pop up flash. If u can do it...let me know how..i really want to know.. for example; EXIF data intact. *the shadows on the shirt is thanks to a secondary light source, for your information. primary is an f42 at 1/8 power in my left hand above the face at a 10 degree angle down. facebook punya problem |
|
|
Sep 1 2009, 09:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
is some situation u need the pop up flash to fill-in some shadows. But im trying to say here, with juz only light source from ur f42...the wireless flash effect is much greater and add 'mood' to ur picture..and also u can bring up some details from ur subject surface if ur flash angle is right..this method is called shadow relief... and back to the original post..i said nikon CLS is able to disable the pop up flash totally... and now u tell me tht even if the pop up flash fires...that would create classic direct flash shadows
here..try do this.. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Sep 1 2009, 10:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
@albnok..yes it does produce light,,,but very very dark light couldnt see the subject...i knew this all along..ahha..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2009, 10:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
QUOTE(albnok @ Sep 1 2009, 10:22 PM) No...it is from my D90... The pop up flash gives very little light only...even i shoot things infront of my table also super dark... when i switch to TTL and Commander mode...then it is well exposed... |
|
|
Sep 3 2009, 12:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
ryzan...butterfly or morph..
|
|
|
Sep 3 2009, 12:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
haha ryzan..no need la..leave it to the next competition! haha..nice shot btw....
|
|
|
Sep 6 2009, 01:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
QUOTE(ianho @ Sep 6 2009, 10:15 AM) The incident happened about 1 year ago to 1 of our Orange bros. Went to buy his CZ1680 lens from this shop in Sg Wang. After taking a good look at it, he told the salesman he will go ATM, take money n think about buying the lens. Actually he wanted to go off 1st coz that Jack fella hi pressure sales him to buy it. He needed a few minutes to think quietly whether he wants it or not. As he walked away, Jack came out from the counter n told him he will follow him to the ATM to take money n take him back to the shop to buy the CZ1680. Which shop? |
|
|
Sep 6 2009, 03:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
QUOTE(finalfantasty @ Sep 6 2009, 02:49 PM) Yesterday, I went to pudu plaza to buy some camera gear. Since I brought my camera, I drop by to a second hand shop and let them to quote the price. They said they will take them if I accept the price of below 100. below 100??? or u mean 1000??? if 1000 and ur gears are a200 + 1780...below 1k is reasonable. dun forget they need to earn. So best is still directly sell to a buyer lol.Is Alpha really so bad? |
|
|
Sep 6 2009, 04:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
QUOTE(nickilala @ Sep 6 2009, 03:42 PM) wah wah d90 above 1d mark 3...hahah anyway..don trust it 100%...looks a bit weird eh..d90 win canon's top? funny...lol and i thought a230 and a330 uses same sensor? why diff ranking?ranking: . . . 20. Nikon D300 21. Sony Alpha 700 . . . . 35. Canon EOS 40D 38. Canon EOS 50D wat does it means? |
|
|
Sep 6 2009, 04:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,955 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Perth Oz |
QUOTE(craziqbal @ Sep 6 2009, 04:23 PM) that is 1Ds mark 3...QUOTE(ianho @ Sep 6 2009, 04:25 PM) LOL dunno what kinda ranking criteria. If it were really true, the Hasselblad owners will cry n Hasselblad factory can go tutup kedai oredi. yea true..very weird hahaa..Whagagagaga it may be some kinda funny ranking with weird results but number 6 makes me happy. If less than rm100 then better keep it in toilet for "product" shooting. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0231sec
0.24
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 05:00 AM |