Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> IQ Result Thread, spend some minutes on this IQ test

views
     
PandoraV
post Aug 5 2009, 11:55 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(razorzx66 @ Aug 4 2009, 01:01 PM)
not like that thread this is serious it has been using for a test for Mensa community.
*
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



Please bear in mind that this test is Not and Never used for Mensa Admission Test,but mensa is based on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices on Cattell scale which has a top score of 180.The purpose of admission test deem to fail to achieve the purposes if the test is speculated so widely like this one.

The test is static and intact,and someone could retake as many times as he/she wishes.With due respect and without exaggerated,this test proves nothing in the end,as you can retake many many times.Assume that someone is not sure about the 3 options in a question given,first choose A,and send to get a score,if it is lower than previous score,it might wrong with A,and go on to try B,C...until get the high score(if you idle enough to keep trying).While you could retake the mensa admission test,but not continuously yet,retake it next year if you're not succeed in your 1st attempt.

For those who got the "high" or "low" scores,don't take it too seriously,just look at it as an entertainment if not as homework for real mensa test.Your scores might change over time due to environment,health,age,and undistract concentration.Further there's another 7 types of intelligence as forward by Howard Gardner apart from spatial ability as require for this test.There is some on going debate whether iq scores proportional to income as well,so all and all the scores is deem not to be the whole things,but you can't ignore it all the way,there's something about it. rolleyes.gif






PandoraV
post Dec 17 2009, 11:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(myVelouria @ Dec 17 2009, 10:41 AM)
yup thats the point. in real test u cannot bring along any paper, pencil/pen or calculator. everything is in your head.
*
Bring undisturbed/uninterrupted brain,just question booklet,answer sheet and pencil on table,nothing more or less than this.
PandoraV
post Dec 17 2009, 11:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(b3ta @ Dec 17 2009, 11:24 AM)
look at my solution for question 39 previous page. if anyone could do all those just in the head i salute him
*
The correct answer would be?
PandoraV
post Dec 17 2009, 11:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(b3ta @ Dec 17 2009, 11:27 AM)
it's abit blur in the paper, but the answer is A
*
Yeah,i see the little blanket at the bottom page.
Btw,you using mathematical solution like 1/2 equal to certain figure to solve this?
PandoraV
post Dec 17 2009, 12:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(b3ta @ Dec 17 2009, 11:42 AM)
nope no maths  laugh.gif pattern recognition.

the 2/1 represents 2 of a kind of shape and 1 of a kind of shape

i.e: 2 triangle 1 round
*
Seems that answer can be B as well instead of A
PandoraV
post Dec 17 2009, 09:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(b3ta @ Dec 17 2009, 01:12 PM)
ahh but y is it A?  laugh.gif  there is a reasoning to it. answer lies in the M section. see if u can figure it out

M is for mixed btw a row with all symbols
*
I checked it once again,at the 2nd column with mix symbols,why is it (circle ) ( X ) ( triangle) and not (circle ) (triangle) ( X ) ?As both still with mix symbols but both X and triangle interchanged.


This post has been edited by PandoraV: Dec 17 2009, 09:17 PM
PandoraV
post Dec 17 2009, 09:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(b3ta @ Dec 17 2009, 09:18 PM)
sorry mind explaining further your confusion?
*
You just look at the answer for both A and B,2nd column from top to btm :circle-x-triangle for answer A,and circle-triangle-x for answer B.
PandoraV
post Dec 17 2009, 10:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(b3ta @ Dec 17 2009, 09:41 PM)
look at all 3 columns. not just vertically but horizontally too. there is a pattern.
*
Horizontally?can you illustrate it?same pattern with vertical?
PandoraV
post Dec 17 2009, 11:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(b3ta @ Dec 17 2009, 10:36 PM)
hmm.gif

k fine.

if u look at M section, there are the M compiled for all 3 sections.

if u look at all 3 sections individually, look horizontally

u will notice a pattern

where the top and bottom have the 2/1 pattern. so based on this logic, the M section in the answer, should also fulfill the 2/1 pattern in the middle section for M.
*
But when you look at the middle one,from left to right horizontally,1st....x-circle-triangle and 2nd x-triangle-circle.So there's 2 mix instead of 1 on others.
PandoraV
post Dec 17 2009, 11:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(b3ta @ Dec 17 2009, 11:02 PM)
??

there's only 1 combination for it to fulfill the 2/1 combination for top n bottom rows, looking horizontally rclxub.gif
*
I got it what you trying to say now,but the center mid one can't accommodate the 2/1 pattern whether vertically or horizontally.
PandoraV
post Dec 18 2009, 11:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(b3ta @ Dec 17 2009, 11:17 PM)
nono ur looking at the wrong one.

user posted image
*
I got it now,seems 1 of the plausible solutions,thanks for your effort dude.
PandoraV
post Dec 18 2009, 10:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(Magick Cauldron @ Dec 18 2009, 11:21 AM)
Where are your screenshots?
*
Mine?try to search for my post at page 8 at this thread.
PandoraV
post Dec 19 2009, 11:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
72 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Harlem Street


QUOTE(soukha @ Dec 19 2009, 05:57 AM)
finally, i found the answer. i think this is the accurate one. almost same as my previous sequence. by using this methode, the middle column will not be neglected anymore.
let me try again to explain this.

first: move last column 1 step down
second: move all the columns to right (1 step)
third: change shape. (invert from my previous third step). therefore o → ▲; ▲ → x; x → o;

use this sequence for 1st block to 2nd block to 3rd block. 3rd block to 4th block, just rotate it 90 degrees clockwise (as mentioned before). then repeat it for the other row.

sorry, last time i cant see the sequence for the middle column. therefore i try to 'divide by 2' my previous sequence. smile.gif
*
Oh my,can it work for vertical(top to bottom) as well?

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0244sec    0.64    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 11:41 AM