Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> IQ Result Thread, spend some minutes on this IQ test

views
     
SUSb3ta
post Dec 19 2009, 04:57 AM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


QUOTE(soukha @ Dec 19 2009, 07:52 AM)
as i mentioned before, for each row, i neglect the midle block. let me try again to explain more detail
consider the first row:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


let see the second row now:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


now the last row:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
haha lol what a theory. btw by not using the middle row, any explanation there? i didnt see any prev questions in the test where u can just choose to neglect certain information laugh.gif

btw the 90 degree thing. nice observation but doesnt proove anything

This post has been edited by b3ta: Dec 19 2009, 04:58 AM
SUSb3ta
post Dec 19 2009, 06:14 AM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


QUOTE(soukha @ Dec 19 2009, 08:57 AM)
finally, i found the answer. i think this is the accurate one. almost same as my previous sequence. by using this methode, the middle column will not be neglected anymore.
let me try again to explain this.

first: move last column 1 step down
second: move all the columns to right (1 step)
third: change shape. (invert from my previous third step). therefore o → ▲; ▲ → x; x → o;

use this sequence for 1st block to 2nd block to 3rd block. 3rd block to 4th block, just rotate it 90 degrees clockwise (as mentioned before). then repeat it for the other row.

sorry, last time i cant see the sequence for the middle column. therefore i try to 'divide by 2' my previous sequence. smile.gif
*
haha thats a really good effort. must have put lots of thought

but im still skeptical about the shape changing part hmm.gif i wonder why is it in that sequence

in my solution i just observed the symbols and found a common pattern, thus leading to my answer without the need to modify the data. which i still believe is the way to solve it, as with previous questions

but probable solution this.

This post has been edited by b3ta: Dec 19 2009, 06:39 AM

2 Pages < 1 2
Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0184sec    0.69    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 05:03 PM