QUOTE(~Rogue~ @ Jul 31 2009, 10:03 AM)
so whats the point of "Unlimited broadband"??????
TMnet:"hi, the point is....WE LIE...HAHA!! "
Streamyx going to cap bandwidth, starting in this spetember Serious Talk
|
|
 Jul 31 2009, 10:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2004 
|
|
Quote|
|
Jul 31 2009, 10:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(balthauser @ Jul 31 2009, 10:09 AM) this is stupid. that is still capping la...still won't solve congestion/hogging problem only way to solve is, charge per usage. your usage under 15GB, you pay RM100. your usage exceed 50GB, you pay RM250 u pay extra if u over the limit... |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 10:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(balthauser @ Jul 31 2009, 10:14 AM) who said i'm against capping? its hogger's fault or izit tm didn upgrade the system even the number of user are overflow??capping is the catalyst to eliminate hogger lulz... i vote the 2nd... |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 10:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(balthauser @ Jul 31 2009, 10:30 AM) ret. even US's ISP been proposing pay per usage as their network can't sustain increasing number of hoggers. the problem is US/ aus as i know they cap in a reasonable limit and giving constant(fast) line connection..even if TMNet upgrade its facilities, retarded hoggers will just increase their retarded hogging activities. seeing you vote for the 2nd, i can safely assume you're one. if tmnet is capping, you sure they'll giving the same service?? by seeing the attitude of tmnet customer service i'm doubt that.. ofcourse I did download, else wat for i subscribe for unlimited access?? to feed tmnet? if tmnet can't hold that much of user and that much of connection don't come out with unlimited access then... juz come out the package tmnet are capable of... i pay the $$ i expect that kinda service... |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 11:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(BugFace @ Jul 31 2009, 11:56 AM) El Cheapo! if cap comes about, they enjoy bringing in more customers without need to buy more bandwidth. many ppl cant see that and thought caping will benifit them.... Nothing they do will benefit us. See any difference when they throttle P2P? Still same slowdowns and etc problems.  |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 12:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(balthauser @ Jul 31 2009, 12:01 PM) well, at least seeing those hogging idiots struggle with 56K speed ahould be satisfying those wanna download will find a way...and you...continue enjoy ur slowline...  |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(Eoma @ Jul 31 2009, 12:04 PM) there's no way around a volume cap Sir... we'll see... |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 12:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(balthauser @ Jul 31 2009, 12:08 PM) idiots hoping for the idiotic. watever u said...u're just jelous...lulz...happy snailing the line.. |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 01:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(nidup @ Jul 31 2009, 12:18 PM) I think he knows nothing. there're always option other than tmnut...Only active in kopitiam, chit chat2. Back to topic with reliable connection and reasonable cap limit.. smartass...dun tihnk that every1's 2" like u... talk big without using the brain to tihnk 1st... This post has been edited by HellJoker: Jul 31 2009, 01:49 PM |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: |  0.0199sec
 0.35
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 09:10 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.