Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages « < 7 8 9 10 11 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Streamyx going to cap bandwidth, starting in this spetember Serious Talk

views
     
firedauz
post Jul 31 2009, 01:49 PM

Kopitiam Official Astronaut
*****
Senior Member
876 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tokyo, London, Singapore, KL, Space



You guise still using Screamyx? laugh.gif
ericpires
post Jul 31 2009, 01:51 PM

Arsenal FC
*******
Senior Member
2,657 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Highbury House, 75 Drayton Park, London


QUOTE(firedauz @ Jul 31 2009, 01:49 PM)
You guise still using Screamyx? laugh.gif
*
Some say best in KL, and even JB
nidup
post Jul 31 2009, 01:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(HellJoker @ Jul 31 2009, 01:45 PM)
there're always option other than tmnut...
with reliable connection and reasonable cap limit..
smartass...dun tihnk that every1's 2" like u...
talk big without using the brain to tihnk 1st...
*
Owh, my statement are based on exp and what i doing now.
TM in progress to migrate all their system from ATM to IP base (eg ZTE,Huawei IP Msan)

I dont think, the speed will be decrease /cap limit in future.

This post has been edited by nidup: Jul 31 2009, 02:26 PM
shaff
post Jul 31 2009, 02:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Seremban



if they cap, its good news
Instant_noodle
post Jul 31 2009, 02:28 PM

nyaaa~~
*******
Senior Member
2,780 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: yokumo village
QUOTE(shaff @ Jul 31 2009, 02:20 PM)
if they cap, its good news
*

and soon u notice rage meters for WoW, WAR players going UP UP and UP!!!

SUSTC_Boy
post Jul 31 2009, 02:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
259 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(shaff @ Jul 31 2009, 02:20 PM)
if they cap, its good news
*
nod.gif Can stop using youtube, IPTV, internet radio & other streaming. Same as in 1996 when I surfed without pictures enabled. Ah the good old days.
old_calculator
post Jul 31 2009, 02:32 PM

Don't go away
*****
Senior Member
980 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuantan, Pahang

user posted image
evolution120
post Jul 31 2009, 02:32 PM

In nickel we trust.
*******
Senior Member
4,306 posts

Joined: Oct 2006

tarak sos tak jadi la bang.. broadband service di msia dah macam *** je, skrg nk limit bandwidth.. reli maju lah malay-sial.. haiz.. sien isp provider..
Wolfgard
post Jul 31 2009, 03:09 PM

Real life Orc in Australia, rawr
*****
Senior Member
892 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melbourne


I think you guys may be confused between capping and throttling.

Right now TM is throttling our connections based on usage/protocols/whatever and that is similar to many other ISPs whether it is in the developed nations or 3rd world ones like ours. A common throttling scenario and quite hyped one back then was the Comcast throttling where people were unable to P2P or have extreme slowness in utilizing application protocols that aren't the 'normal' ones. Note that throttling is often non-transparent and ISPs do not openly discuss what is being controlled and what isn't, except unless they get pressure from the FCC or in our case, the very useless MCMC (not sure about that).

Capping on the other hand is or should be transparent. In Australia, you have ISPs selling packages with 20GB, 40GB, 60GB, 120GB and 250GB per month with peak and offpeak gigabyte pools. For many wireless carriers in the world, i.e. Verizon Wireless/Sprint and our own Celcom, 5GB is the max due to spectrum issues and congestions with the current 3G/CDMA Rev A connections. If the original poster's source is talking about capping, yes that means Streamyx will be announcing hard bandwidth caps.

Will it help? From my own experience, yes it does. Occasionally on the slower packages i.e. Hellstra's Bugpond 5GB packages, at the end of the cycles you get slow network due to people trying to burn off their allocated capacities. For the biggest ones, I've never experienced any slowness. Overall with capping and people not overloading the networks, there should be a noticeable difference.

That being said, Streamyx MUST offer decent packages and not the nonsense 5GB that our wireless telcos are offering.
SUSsoundsyst64
post Jul 31 2009, 03:19 PM

I'm No-Longer-Noobs
*******
Senior Member
3,725 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: In /hardware/

BLAME FIKRI SALLEH!!
JinXXX
post Jul 31 2009, 05:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,516 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Uarla Umpur



QUOTE(soundsyst64 @ Jul 31 2009, 03:19 PM)
BLAME FIKRI SALLEH!!
*
+99999 yeah burn.. FIKRI SALLEH...
evolution120
post Jul 31 2009, 05:15 PM

In nickel we trust.
*******
Senior Member
4,306 posts

Joined: Oct 2006

QUOTE(Wolfgard @ Jul 31 2009, 03:09 PM)
I think you guys may be confused between capping and throttling.

Right now TM is throttling our connections based on usage/protocols/whatever and that is similar to many other ISPs whether it is in the developed nations or 3rd world ones like ours. A common throttling scenario and quite hyped one back then was the Comcast throttling where people were unable to P2P or have extreme slowness in utilizing application protocols that aren't the 'normal' ones. Note that throttling is often non-transparent and ISPs do not openly discuss what is being controlled and what isn't, except unless they get pressure from the FCC or in our case, the very useless MCMC (not sure about that).

Capping on the other hand is or should be transparent. In Australia, you have ISPs selling packages with 20GB, 40GB, 60GB, 120GB and 250GB per month with peak and offpeak gigabyte pools. For many wireless carriers in the world, i.e. Verizon Wireless/Sprint and our own Celcom, 5GB is the max due to spectrum issues and congestions with the current 3G/CDMA Rev A connections. If the original poster's source is talking about capping, yes that means Streamyx will be announcing hard bandwidth caps.

Will it help? From my own experience, yes it does. Occasionally on the slower packages i.e. Hellstra's Bugpond 5GB packages, at the end of the cycles you get slow network due to people trying to burn off their allocated capacities. For the biggest ones, I've never experienced any slowness. Overall with capping and people not overloading the networks, there should be a noticeable difference.

That being said, Streamyx MUST offer decent packages and not the nonsense 5GB that our wireless telcos are offering.
*
u copied from somewhere or u type it out yourself?
SUSbuntutman
post Jul 31 2009, 05:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
324 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
wokay
Cloudx
post Jul 31 2009, 05:19 PM

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
******
Senior Member
1,521 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Island where you get pearl


For me.. ada cap tak ada cap pun no different.. like tortoise yawn.gif

This post has been edited by Cloudx: Jul 31 2009, 05:19 PM
naTTan
post Jul 31 2009, 05:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,138 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


QUOTE(Wolfgard @ Jul 31 2009, 03:09 PM)
I think you guys may be confused between capping and throttling.

Right now TM is throttling our connections based on usage/protocols/whatever and that is similar to many other ISPs whether it is in the developed nations or 3rd world ones like ours. A common throttling scenario and quite hyped one back then was the Comcast throttling where people were unable to P2P or have extreme slowness in utilizing application protocols that aren't the 'normal' ones. Note that throttling is often non-transparent and ISPs do not openly discuss what is being controlled and what isn't, except unless they get pressure from the FCC or in our case, the very useless MCMC (not sure about that).

Capping on the other hand is or should be transparent. In Australia, you have ISPs selling packages with 20GB, 40GB, 60GB, 120GB and 250GB per month with peak and offpeak gigabyte pools. For many wireless carriers in the world, i.e. Verizon Wireless/Sprint and our own Celcom, 5GB is the max due to spectrum issues and congestions with the current 3G/CDMA Rev A connections. If the original poster's source is talking about capping, yes that means Streamyx will be announcing hard bandwidth caps.

Will it help? From my own experience, yes it does. Occasionally on the slower packages i.e. Hellstra's Bugpond 5GB packages, at the end of the cycles you get slow network due to people trying to burn off their allocated capacities. For the biggest ones, I've never experienced any slowness. Overall with capping and people not overloading the networks, there should be a noticeable difference.

That being said, Streamyx MUST offer decent packages and not the nonsense 5GB that our wireless telcos are offering.
*

Celcom 3G has cap? Hmm this fact goes unnotice, i guess the same for WiMAX is true too. How about Maxis 3G? So far i can use VOIP with it, and want to take advantage of that fact.
vorchiel
post Jul 31 2009, 05:25 PM

ლ(ಠ_ಠ ლ)
****
Senior Member
666 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Left Hand Society, West London
if i mean if if this really gets implemented by tmnut,

pray that they will only throttle down the connection to 128k or whatever after the quota has been used, and not charging for extra gigabytes.

some isp will just charge you for those overused gigabytes, and some just throttle down, the worse case if they do both.
confused-freaker
post Jul 31 2009, 06:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
662 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(evolution120 @ Jul 31 2009, 05:15 PM)
u copied from somewhere or u type it out yourself?
*
+10
ruffstuff
post Jul 31 2009, 06:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(evolution120 @ Jul 31 2009, 05:15 PM)
u copied from somewhere or u type it out yourself?
*
discredit attempt failed?
SUShako
post Jul 31 2009, 06:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
245 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: Malaysia


Shit. blame Fikri Salleh.
babysiiaozz
post Jul 31 2009, 06:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
342 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: kl


screamyx = scammyx

11 Pages « < 7 8 9 10 11 >
Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0220sec    0.37    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 08:48 PM