Streamyx going to cap bandwidth, starting in this spetember Serious Talk
Streamyx going to cap bandwidth, starting in this spetember Serious Talk
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 01:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
876 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tokyo, London, Singapore, KL, Space |
You guise still using Screamyx?
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 01:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,657 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Highbury House, 75 Drayton Park, London |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 01:57 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
73 posts Joined: May 2008 |
QUOTE(HellJoker @ Jul 31 2009, 01:45 PM) there're always option other than tmnut... Owh, my statement are based on exp and what i doing now.with reliable connection and reasonable cap limit.. smartass...dun tihnk that every1's 2" like u... talk big without using the brain to tihnk 1st... TM in progress to migrate all their system from ATM to IP base (eg ZTE,Huawei IP Msan) I dont think, the speed will be decrease /cap limit in future. This post has been edited by nidup: Jul 31 2009, 02:26 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 02:20 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
127 posts Joined: Jul 2006 From: Seremban |
if they cap, its good news
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 02:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,780 posts Joined: Jun 2008 From: yokumo village |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 02:29 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
259 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 02:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
980 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Kuantan, Pahang |
![]() |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 02:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,306 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
tarak sos tak jadi la bang.. broadband service di msia dah macam *** je, skrg nk limit bandwidth.. reli maju lah malay-sial.. haiz.. sien isp provider..
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 03:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
892 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melbourne |
I think you guys may be confused between capping and throttling.
Right now TM is throttling our connections based on usage/protocols/whatever and that is similar to many other ISPs whether it is in the developed nations or 3rd world ones like ours. A common throttling scenario and quite hyped one back then was the Comcast throttling where people were unable to P2P or have extreme slowness in utilizing application protocols that aren't the 'normal' ones. Note that throttling is often non-transparent and ISPs do not openly discuss what is being controlled and what isn't, except unless they get pressure from the FCC or in our case, the very useless MCMC (not sure about that). Capping on the other hand is or should be transparent. In Australia, you have ISPs selling packages with 20GB, 40GB, 60GB, 120GB and 250GB per month with peak and offpeak gigabyte pools. For many wireless carriers in the world, i.e. Verizon Wireless/Sprint and our own Celcom, 5GB is the max due to spectrum issues and congestions with the current 3G/CDMA Rev A connections. If the original poster's source is talking about capping, yes that means Streamyx will be announcing hard bandwidth caps. Will it help? From my own experience, yes it does. Occasionally on the slower packages i.e. Hellstra's Bugpond 5GB packages, at the end of the cycles you get slow network due to people trying to burn off their allocated capacities. For the biggest ones, I've never experienced any slowness. Overall with capping and people not overloading the networks, there should be a noticeable difference. That being said, Streamyx MUST offer decent packages and not the nonsense 5GB that our wireless telcos are offering. |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 03:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,725 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: In /hardware/ |
BLAME FIKRI SALLEH!!
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 05:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,516 posts Joined: Feb 2007 From: Uarla Umpur |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 05:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,306 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(Wolfgard @ Jul 31 2009, 03:09 PM) I think you guys may be confused between capping and throttling. u copied from somewhere or u type it out yourself?Right now TM is throttling our connections based on usage/protocols/whatever and that is similar to many other ISPs whether it is in the developed nations or 3rd world ones like ours. A common throttling scenario and quite hyped one back then was the Comcast throttling where people were unable to P2P or have extreme slowness in utilizing application protocols that aren't the 'normal' ones. Note that throttling is often non-transparent and ISPs do not openly discuss what is being controlled and what isn't, except unless they get pressure from the FCC or in our case, the very useless MCMC (not sure about that). Capping on the other hand is or should be transparent. In Australia, you have ISPs selling packages with 20GB, 40GB, 60GB, 120GB and 250GB per month with peak and offpeak gigabyte pools. For many wireless carriers in the world, i.e. Verizon Wireless/Sprint and our own Celcom, 5GB is the max due to spectrum issues and congestions with the current 3G/CDMA Rev A connections. If the original poster's source is talking about capping, yes that means Streamyx will be announcing hard bandwidth caps. Will it help? From my own experience, yes it does. Occasionally on the slower packages i.e. Hellstra's Bugpond 5GB packages, at the end of the cycles you get slow network due to people trying to burn off their allocated capacities. For the biggest ones, I've never experienced any slowness. Overall with capping and people not overloading the networks, there should be a noticeable difference. That being said, Streamyx MUST offer decent packages and not the nonsense 5GB that our wireless telcos are offering. |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 05:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
324 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
wokay
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 05:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,521 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Island where you get pearl |
For me.. ada cap tak ada cap pun no different.. like tortoise
This post has been edited by Cloudx: Jul 31 2009, 05:19 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 05:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,138 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(Wolfgard @ Jul 31 2009, 03:09 PM) I think you guys may be confused between capping and throttling. Right now TM is throttling our connections based on usage/protocols/whatever and that is similar to many other ISPs whether it is in the developed nations or 3rd world ones like ours. A common throttling scenario and quite hyped one back then was the Comcast throttling where people were unable to P2P or have extreme slowness in utilizing application protocols that aren't the 'normal' ones. Note that throttling is often non-transparent and ISPs do not openly discuss what is being controlled and what isn't, except unless they get pressure from the FCC or in our case, the very useless MCMC (not sure about that). Capping on the other hand is or should be transparent. In Australia, you have ISPs selling packages with 20GB, 40GB, 60GB, 120GB and 250GB per month with peak and offpeak gigabyte pools. For many wireless carriers in the world, i.e. Verizon Wireless/Sprint and our own Celcom, 5GB is the max due to spectrum issues and congestions with the current 3G/CDMA Rev A connections. If the original poster's source is talking about capping, yes that means Streamyx will be announcing hard bandwidth caps. Will it help? From my own experience, yes it does. Occasionally on the slower packages i.e. Hellstra's Bugpond 5GB packages, at the end of the cycles you get slow network due to people trying to burn off their allocated capacities. For the biggest ones, I've never experienced any slowness. Overall with capping and people not overloading the networks, there should be a noticeable difference. That being said, Streamyx MUST offer decent packages and not the nonsense 5GB that our wireless telcos are offering. Celcom 3G has cap? Hmm this fact goes unnotice, i guess the same for WiMAX is true too. How about Maxis 3G? So far i can use VOIP with it, and want to take advantage of that fact. |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 05:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
666 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Left Hand Society, West London |
if i mean if if this really gets implemented by tmnut,
pray that they will only throttle down the connection to 128k or whatever after the quota has been used, and not charging for extra gigabytes. some isp will just charge you for those overused gigabytes, and some just throttle down, the worse case if they do both. |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 06:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
662 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 06:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,345 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 06:40 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
245 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: Malaysia |
Shit. blame Fikri Salleh.
|
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 06:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
342 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: kl |
screamyx = scammyx
|
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0220sec
0.37
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 08:48 PM |