QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Aug 9 2009, 02:45 AM)
SKY 1809,
You TOTALLY messed up as to what is ASSET ALLOCATION model.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/assetallocation.asp
In asset allocation model, you stick to the SAME RATIO regardless what the market is doing.
You REBALANCE to the same ratio every year or based on 5/25 rebalancing rule.
So, if you 60/40 (stock / bond), in a bull market, you sell stock to buy bond. In a bear market, you sell bond to buy share.
The RATIO stay the same. It does not change.
In 5/25 rebalancing rule, you sell an asset if
A) 5%
the asset increase more than 5% of its ratio
or
B) 25%
The asset increase 25%
What ever come first.
So, if you do 60/40, you sell stock when it is 65% of your portfolio.
In ANY CASES, asset allocation model do not care about P/E and etc....
Dreamer
Hi Dreamer,You TOTALLY messed up as to what is ASSET ALLOCATION model.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/assetallocation.asp
In asset allocation model, you stick to the SAME RATIO regardless what the market is doing.
You REBALANCE to the same ratio every year or based on 5/25 rebalancing rule.
So, if you 60/40 (stock / bond), in a bull market, you sell stock to buy bond. In a bear market, you sell bond to buy share.
The RATIO stay the same. It does not change.
In 5/25 rebalancing rule, you sell an asset if
A) 5%
the asset increase more than 5% of its ratio
or
B) 25%
The asset increase 25%
What ever come first.
So, if you do 60/40, you sell stock when it is 65% of your portfolio.
In ANY CASES, asset allocation model do not care about P/E and etc....
Dreamer
AS I said earlier , I just oversimplify it and it is adopted from Public Mutual which is copyrighted.
And what is a bear or bull market ?
If CI is trading at 1500 pts, do you think it is a bull market ? So should one be fully in Bonds ?
And what is a bear market ? Subjective to me also. Which part of Bear Market is more or less bearish to invest ?
The Public Mutual Asset Allocation ( the one I refer to ) is quite difference from the original model I study in Financial Planning , as a matter of fact.
First PB used CI points as the model but CI as you know may not represent the fair valuation of your investments. Besides, if at 1600 pts let say, then it would be at uncharted area , the model ceased to be effective.
So Public Mutual switched to PE as a modification of Asset Allocation to reflect a better picture, not a perfect model either.
At first, I disagree but it does actually make sense to me, so I adopt it.
Investment tools are " dead" if we do not consider the current situation such as "IF we were to be at 1600pts or so."
The methods we use is just another way to measure Bull or Bear, neither a perfect model, but do considering the risk and return factors.
You can disagree of course. Your model could be America's model, therefore tends to be more original. But it has to be relevant to our Malaysian Market. I doubt your model is also as original as the ones from the textbook.
Use which is comfortable to you.
No point to argue further
This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Aug 9 2009, 08:02 PM
Aug 9 2009, 07:46 AM

Quote
0.0478sec
0.46
7 queries
GZIP Disabled