Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 5 Ways to Let a Girl Know You're Interested In Her, with none of this "confessing" nonsense

views
     
ezralimm
post Aug 2 2009, 03:38 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Aug 2 2009, 01:20 PM)
No, they're people who can see the bigger picture. I've told you many times that you're not entirely wrong, but you're not entire right either. Your "exceptions" do not exist to me, because from my point of view, everything can be explained using the same theory. Your theories have exceptions. Your data set is minimal, and your theory doesn't work on a larger dataset, you hand wave it away saying that those are exceptions rather than admitting your theory is weak and trying to improve it to include the larger data set.
*
Silverhawk, you bl00dy wanker. First you talk about people making "rules". Now you're talking about "datasets". Like wtf. Get a life. Get out of your room.

My theory works on every scenario i have come across. Exceptions are rare, but do exist.

Example:

My Theory On A Social Norm: Girls will rarely date a guy significantly shorter (6cm+) and significantly lighter (<5kg) than she is.

1) Look at every reasonably attractive (whatever your definition of attractive is) girl around you who is taken. Look at the guy next to her.
2) Occasionally, as in very occasionally, you will find an exception.


I acknowledge #1 while also acknowledging #2. I place the appropriate amount of emphasis on both.

you place pretty much all your emphasis on #2, and everytime I mention #1 and #2, you criticize me for mentioning #1, claiming that im narrow minded etc.



RE: Ad hominems.
To Other Readers:
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ad-hominem.html
I leave it to you to decide smile.gif
ezralimm
post Aug 2 2009, 03:53 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Dickson. PM sent.


Added on August 2, 2009, 3:59 pmI dont really mind if my theories are challenged.

But this guy is not challenging them. He is simply ranting about how it is wrong to place adequate emphasis on social norms (with all that talk about "datasets" OMG) and then throwing wild accusations towards me (like I dont notice there are exceptions), discrediting my theories in the process.



#0) One of Ezra's Theories On Social Norm: Girls will rarely date a guy significantly shorter (6cm+) and significantly lighter (<5kg+) than she is.
#1) Look at every reasonably attractive (whatever your definition of attractive is) girl around you who is taken. Look at the guy next to her. Do you find #0 true in your reality?
#2) Occasionally, as in very occasionally, you will find an exception.

Silverhawk: Do you agree, in a simple YES or NO, to the statements above?
#0 YES/NO
#1 YES/NO
#2 YES/NO

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Aug 2 2009, 04:19 PM
ezralimm
post Aug 2 2009, 05:57 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(happy4ever @ Aug 2 2009, 05:03 PM)
I have seen a lot of shorter males going out with girls.

Physical attraction isn't a priority to girls as opposed to males. Man are easily excited based on sight, while woman are a whole different world altogether. From sight, sound, touch, communication, career etc.

Even making a woman get excited is an entire different ball game. In fact, women prefers less handsome males or those with shorter manhoods to make love with, because these males will not think so highly of themselves, and be good servant when their female masters spreads her legs. Handsome males will be so full of themselves, and always end up satisfying himself first...which puts the woman off.
*
For the record:

1) I was giving an example.
2) My theory doesnt place that much emphasis on PHYSICAL attractiveness at all. (see my latest thread: http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1107954)
3) I was referring to guys who are BOTH significantly shorter (6cm+) and significantly lighter (<5kg+) in my example.


I have dated a girl 2cm taller than myself. Note the word *significantly*

again, exception does not disprove the norm.


Added on August 2, 2009, 5:59 pm
QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Aug 2 2009, 04:49 PM)
Lmao. laugh.gif

Girls aren't that shallow when it boils down to choosing their soulmate. I mean attraction on the looks does matter, but it's not the main thing IMHO. At least decent looking then good enough lah~

*
That's exactly what im saying: http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1107954



This post has been edited by ezralimm: Aug 2 2009, 05:59 PM
ezralimm
post Aug 2 2009, 06:56 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Aug 2 2009, 06:37 PM)
Yes, because if you have to mention #1, it shows you don't really understand attraction. You got one part right, but still have a lot to learn.

I will not answer your questions because those are loaded questions. It will need to me to agree to your view of reality, and narrow scope of attraction. Both which I do not agree with.

Nice try though smile.gif
*
I mentioned very clearly that it was only an example of ONE OF THE THEORIES you dumbfvck.

Dont try and pin me down like you always do.


To other readers: Physical attraction is only part of the picture. Mental and emotional health are equally important, and of course security (eg. financial). Read my thread here - http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1107954 I believe I place appropriate emphasis on physical attraction. It's up to you to decide - have a read of the thread and give me a shout!



QUOTE
#0) One of Ezra's Theories On Social Norm: Girls will rarely date a guy significantly shorter (6cm+) and significantly lighter (<5kg+) than she is.
#1) Look at every reasonably attractive (whatever your definition of attractive is) girl around you who is taken. Look at the guy next to her. Do you find #0 true in your reality?
#2) Occasionally, as in very occasionally, you will find an exception.

Silverhawk: Do you agree, in a simple YES or NO, to the statements above?
#0 YES/NO
#1 YES/NO
#2 YES/NO


Silverhawk, can i assume that your answer to those very simple questions is "NO"?

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Aug 2 2009, 06:58 PM
ezralimm
post Aug 2 2009, 07:01 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(teongpeng @ Aug 2 2009, 06:57 PM)
ezralim to handsomeness is what bernard7 is to $

both also blur case.
*
hmm, who is bernard7?
ezralimm
post Aug 2 2009, 07:04 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(teongpeng @ Aug 2 2009, 07:01 PM)
weiii i tell you la.....looks for guys when it comes to attracting women is not true at all la.......

I used to have lots of gangster friends with really hot chicks....they ARE the norm...not the exception.

and i also see alot of guys with talent, but no looks that gets the bestest chicks. I also see rich guys with no looks getting the chicks, and also guys with the most confidence...they too get the hottest chicks. really wan la weiiiii
*
I agree. Looks arent that important if you are a guy, but physical attributes still do play a role.
Note the word *SIGNIFICANT* in the example I gave.


Physical attraction is definitely part of the picture...but there are other equally important things as well. Read my thread here: http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1107954


Added on August 2, 2009, 7:06 pm
QUOTE(teongpeng @ Aug 2 2009, 07:01 PM)
Tall, short, skinny, fat....all these makes ZERO importance if you got talent, charisma, confidence, funny, witty, smart etc
*
Totally.

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1107954

Healthy body. Healthy mind. Healthy emotions. Lots of friends.



1) Look at the people you find to be charismatic/confident.
2) Look at the people you find to be dull and boring and shy.


What do they have in common?



Healthy mind/emotions/social life are all important for a man to thrive in life and build up his charisma.

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Aug 2 2009, 07:06 PM
ezralimm
post Aug 2 2009, 09:30 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Aug 2 2009, 07:13 PM)
Whatever man, your writing speaks for itself. Just like you said in another topic, true self confidence can't be faked, the same is true with the understanding of attraction. While you mention other theories, and exceptions, and try to sugarcoat what you say by saying u place appropriate emphasis on physical attraction. I see all that as simply a smoke screen to make your writings more palatable to the public.
He's a forumer here that is incredibly bitter about women being materialistic and truly believes that women only look for money in men. A firm believer of the "ada wang ada amoi" philosophy laugh.gif
*
just to jerk your memory, you were the one who accused me of trying to belittle people.

Do you know what it means to sugar coat something? Or to gloss over reality?

Below is a definition of "sugarcoat"
http://www.answers.com/topic/sugarcoat

I have sugar coated nothing. In fact, I have been pretty point blank (straightforward) and I do see how some people may be hurt although I do try to be as politically correct as possible.

I have not been "glossing over reality". If I did that, nobody would have been "put down" or "belittled"

I realize that the game of love is competitive. There will be winners and losers.

I stand by everything that I say. Essentially in one simple sentence:

Having a healthy body, mind and emotional state will make any guy more attractive to women.

I believe in placing APPROPRIATE emphasis on all aspects mentioned above.

To other readers: Please see my thread http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1107954


^silver: see the amount of emphasis i placed on each subheading in my thread. Im sure I didnt place too much emphasis on physical attributes.

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Aug 2 2009, 09:31 PM
ezralimm
post Aug 2 2009, 11:24 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(teongpeng @ Aug 2 2009, 10:25 PM)
People who are hurt by the truth dont really mind getting hurt wan..like that only can grow ma....but when ppl not hurt but u say they are hurt, like that means u 'belittle' them liau. u say like they so teruk like that..and u act like you so terrer like that, can hurt ppl...
Be humble ma...its not how much u know its how much you care.
*
"belittle"


...says the gay fvck who calls other guys "sweetie" rolleyes.gif
ezralimm
post Aug 3 2009, 10:20 AM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Aug 3 2009, 12:29 AM)
Yes sherlock, and having 2 healthy legs makes it easier to walk. Exactly what is the value in that statement? What if your legs are unhealthy, or you're handicapped somehow, how do you deal with it? How do you make yourself better within your limitations? What is it that drives these people to success despite their handicap?

Whether its about career, love, relationships, health etc. The same basic drive exists in everyone that is successful. You look at unattractive couplings, and you think "exceptions". I look at it, and I see the same inner quality that exists in successful people. To me its not an exception, because I perceive things at a different level.

I've said time and time again, you're not wrong but you're not right either.
*
Wow, first datasets, now you bring what you call "handicapped" people into the conversation.

There is no stopping the silverhawk!


What you are talking about does not contradict my statement:


Ezra Sez: Having a healthy body, mind and emotional state will make any guy more attractive to women

Silver Sez: What if your legs are unhealthy, or you're handicapped somehow, how do you deal with it? How do you make yourself better within your limitations? What is it that drives these people to success despite their handicap?

YOU DISCRIMINATORY SON OF A B1TCH. You calling a person with one leg "handicapped"? I dont agree to labelling people like that.

MY STATEMENT APPLIES TO ALL GUYS, even if you dont have a leg, or if you are blind... or if you have one eyebrow.

Note the use of the word *any* in my statement.


Added on August 3, 2009, 10:22 amEvery guy should work to be in the best physical, mental and emotional state possible. Awesome FTW! rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Aug 3 2009, 10:22 AM
ezralimm
post Aug 3 2009, 12:16 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Aug 3 2009, 11:31 AM)
Err, *waves* lookie here.

The word handicapped is best reserved to describe a disabled person who is unable to function owing to some property of the environment. Thus people with a physical disability requiring a

...

How is handicapped being discriminatory?  unsure.gif

Seriously the figurative speech of ezra seems to be getting out of hand.

*
Silver was suggesting that having one leg made a person "handicapped" in the game of love.

I dont believe so. Even according to your definition:
QUOTE
Thus people with a physical disability requiring a wheelchair may or may not be handicapped, depending on whether wheelchair ramps are made available to them. See Usage Note at disabled.


In any case, lacking in any physical attributes cannot be used as an excuse for failing in the game of love. True, some physical attributes (like a lost leg / height / bone size) cannot be changed....but it doesnt meant that a person with a lost leg shouldnt take good care of himself. Sure he cant run a marathon, but he should still exercise and eat well.

Healthy body + Healthy mind + Healthy emotional state = Makes a man...any man... more attractive to women.

I'm just quite disgusted that Silver had to bring in people with "one leg" into the conversation...and label them handicapped. It's not for him to judge!

You can have one eye, no eyebrows, and a single wooden leg. It is no excuse for not trying to stay in shape and be in good mental and emotional health.

user posted image
Go for gold! Be Awesome.


The disabled runner may not be able to compete with the able bodied, but he still strives to win within his league.


EVERYONE has flaws. Some people have physical inadequacies (ie. one leg.). Some people have mental flaws (ie. are stupid). Some people have psychiatric flaws (ie. OCD). In a practical, real world dating scenario, (im just using this as an EXAMPLE ok....) a person with any flaw should not go around ignoring the impact his flaw has on his dating life. The person should instead realize it for what it is and take steps to better himself, potentially overshadowing the flaw in the process.


The guy with one leg born to a poor family. Eeks out a living. Recognizes his disability for what it is and then takes realistic steps to overcome it (ie. getting a prosthesis, joining societies etc) starts a business, and becomes successful in life. He thrives on a challenge. Girls will notice his confidence...that he is a winner in life...from the moment he opens his mouth.



Be The Best You Can Be! rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Aug 3 2009, 12:22 PM
ezralimm
post Aug 3 2009, 12:24 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(debbieyss @ Aug 2 2009, 07:57 PM)
One who doesn't have the possitive and agressive drive of life, any value or priority of monetary sense is useless to me.

And the only thing to prove if he is really mature in terms of personality and attitude is his career and financial status.
*
Well said. I agree completely thumbup.gif



The positive and aggresive drive of life, along with the personality, career and financial status to back it up.

Definitely teh WINRAR.

I strive towards that.
ezralimm
post Aug 3 2009, 02:39 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Aug 3 2009, 01:20 PM)
Smoking, drinking (alcohol, clarifying it with you cause I'm starting to doubt your intelligence) are unhealthy. By your definition these people by default are less attractive to others, and those who don't (normally goody goody guys) are by default, more attractive. Yet who are the ones getting the girls? You can see a hot chick with a fat guy, and a good looking buff guy sitting sadly all alone at a bar. What does that tell you? Exceptions?
*
...but it's not an epic fail tongue.gif

hahaha, you can declare what you want. Readers have a brain.

First you talk about datasets, then it was the handicapped, now it's about smoking and drinking. sweat.gif
Just to set the record straight, I have not mentioned anything about smoking and drinking...yet.

To pour fuel on the fire, I am going to say now, categorically that:

SMOKING (addicted) and DRINKING (alcohol, to excess.) makes a person less desirable to the opposite sex. This applies to both guys and girls. Because:

1) There are many girls who simply will not date guys who smoke.
2) Drinking can screw you up pretty easily. Not only brain cells die, but you become less masculine/feminine as it fvcks up your body chemistry as well.
3) There are some people who prefer partners who smoke/drink, but they are the exception not the norm.


Given a choice between A and B, with all other factors being the same, a great majority of people would choose the one that does not smoke/drink.

Of course, people only have that many choices in the game of love...We have to live with our partner's flaws. Some people have one leg, some people smoke, some people drink, some people compulsively wank (lol), and some people are stupid. NOBODY is perfect.


You can say what you like... that is my opinion.


To pour more fuel on the fire:


I probably wont mind if I am going out with a sizzling hot girl...who smokes. smile.gif

What im trying to say is that NOBODY is perfect. We all tolerate each others flaws...so long as attractiveness can overcome those flaws.

So work to be the best you can be!

Be in the best physical, mental and emotional health possible.

Awesome.FTW! cool2.gif

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Aug 3 2009, 02:50 PM
ezralimm
post Aug 4 2009, 07:50 AM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(n00b13 @ Aug 3 2009, 03:54 PM)
People have been saying that ezra's and hawk's debate has driven this thread off-topic. It's not off-topic, actually - because what ezra is saying is the exact opposite of what my original post is about. I wrote about those 5 ways as a better alternative to "confessing" your feelings for a girl, and one reason why they're better is that they are active. Ezra, your philosophy is entirely passive - you're all about what girls like. Girls don't like this, girls only like that, girls will be attracted to you if you're this, girls won't give you the time of day if you're that.
*
Passive my a$$.
1) Wait for girl to show interest (sublime eye contact, body posture)
2) Reciprocate when the girl starts talking to you.
3) Empathize, empathize, empathize.
4) Go out with her!!

IMO, it's all about devoting your thoughts and mental efforts into getting to know the girl as a human being. It is NOT passive. After initial contact, it's up to you to arrange dates etc. Build rapport. Take the lead. THe ball is at your feet.

If you never had girls (whom you find reasonably attractive) show this kind of interest towards you, you may have misunderstood what I'm talking about.

You did bring up a good point though. I will update my thread appropriately.

QUOTE(n00b13 @ Aug 3 2009, 03:54 PM)
By your theory, if I meet a beautiful lady who's taller than me and weighs more than me, I have zero chance with her?
*
I never said zero. I said almost zero* if she is SIGNIFICANTLY taller and heavier than you. Note the word significantly. You know where you stand in the game of love. Im sure you with all your "experience" have tried to approach girls significantly taller and heavier than you.

*Does not apply in age of desperation (late 20's-mid 30s.)

QUOTE(n00b13 @ Aug 3 2009, 03:54 PM)
And maybe you'll try to weasel out with your "there are always exceptions" spiel. Well, bullshit to that too. Anyone with any decent amount of life experience can see that these are not exceptions, because your vaunted standards of attractiveness are pretty much meaningless. And now you're talking about drinking and smoking? I know of at least a dozen guys, all of whom drink and smoke, all of whom are married to beautiful, loving wives. You know why those guys are married to those women? Because they tackled them. They saw a girl they liked, they went out and pursued them, and they did it the right way. They definitely didn't wait for her to give the green light before they went go. What you're basically saying is that dating and romance and love are entirely controlled by girls, which is... man, where do I start. It's naive. It's lazy. It's cowardly. It's insensitive. And it is, utterly, incredibly, stupidly wrong.
*
YOU STUPID A$$.

NOBODY ever said that a guy who smokes cannot get married.

I was simply saying that generally, SMOKING makes a man, any man, less attractive to girls.

As i also mentioned like three times, EVERYONE has flaws... NOBODY is perfect. We all tolerate flaws in our partners (both platonic and romantic) to a certain degree.

QUOTE(n00b13 @ Aug 3 2009, 03:54 PM)
You said before that you're 23 years old. I hate to judge you based on your age, but I have to say you're a little kid, ezra. You seem to be speaking from the very small world of boys and girls your own age, fresh out of college (if not still studying), little experience in the working world, and still full of the ideals and naiveties of that age. And you definitely are not qualified to be dispensing "advice".
*
Ok, I shall clarify. I am 23. I am currently not committed to anyone, and I am actively trying to up my game. I am sharing on this forum what I am certain works (for me at least). There are winners and losers in the game of love, and I intend to be one of the winners. To do so, means recognizing truth and taking active steps to be the absolute best that I can with what I have.

I am dead sure that if I were to start smoking, I will be less attractive to girls. You can argue this till the cows come home - I stand by EVERYTHING that I said - Healthy mind, healthy body, healthy emotional state.

You want to talk about experience? Add me on facebook. Search for Ezra Limm. I've already been contacted by a few other forumers.... and all I can say is that there is a lot of naivity around. The people who harp on exceptions are the ones who pin their hopes on them ;-)

Ultimately, they know where they stand in the game of love... and life will be the judge of the words they speak.


You wanna keep trying to date the girl one foot taller, and 5kg heavier than you? Fine. Nobody is stopping your active approach. But my bet is that it's not going to work unless you have compensated for it by being really really awesome in other aspects of life - being successful in career is one of them.

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Aug 4 2009, 08:05 AM
ezralimm
post Aug 4 2009, 08:07 AM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Hmm, well, every girl I have ever spoken to prefers guys who dont smoke. Given two guys who are exactly the same (eg. twins at a nightclub), one who smokes, the other doesnt... A girl will choose the non-smoker - unless she was a smoker herself.

I dont know the situation in Malaysia atm, but over here smoking has become pretty taboo...and very few girls smoke - especially the vane pretty ones tongue.gif


Added on August 4, 2009, 8:12 amI prefer a girl who doesnt smoke too.

But if an attractive girl starts showing interest in me, I wouldnt mind even if she smoked.


Im sure the same thing is happening to girls. If an attractive guy starts showing interest in a girl, she probably wouldnt mind even if he smoked....unless she had other equally or more attractive guys who didnt smoke also show interest in her.

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Aug 4 2009, 08:12 AM
ezralimm
post Aug 4 2009, 04:10 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(LostWanderer @ Aug 4 2009, 02:18 PM)
here though, i would like to correct teongpeng and happy4ever for a while

well, in malaysia, i am pretty aware of the people around me, girls and guys especially if i pop them the question, would you like a smoker to be your potential spouse, i would get the majority answer as a no

maybe it's your group of friends you are mixing with, that is why you get a different response or see a different point of view that your smoking friends are married

well, also, you need to bear in mind that society is changing towards a non-smoking seeking spouse behavior, as i remember from a survey conducted by thestar previously, many stated no for their answer (of course, those whom are married already will be living in a different time phase comparing to the non-married ones)

in short,
if its just a direct question, without any extra personal variables, of course smoking is a less attractive trait to have, unless you are somebody in the other person's eyes

ask any person (that you don't know) from their early mid 20's who ain't married and see your results from the answer...of course, given the fact that if they are a smoker then most likely they would not mind as well
*
QUOTE(happy4ever @ Aug 4 2009, 03:52 PM)
I have a large circle of friends, smokers and non-smokers. While smoking is less desirable, it isn't much of a deterrent either in going into a fruitful relationship. And most of the time, their mates are non-smokers.
*
I think lostwanderer and happy4ever summarized it up nicely smile.gif
Just because smoking makes you less desirable, it doesnt kill your chances.
But it definitely is a plus if you didnt smoke wink.gif

As I said... I would definitely date a girl who smokes I find her attractive enough. Im sure the same goes for girls as well.


Added on August 4, 2009, 4:14 pm
QUOTE(Dickson Poon @ Aug 4 2009, 04:07 PM)
Why bother giving feedback or criticism to Ezra? He's only going to either

1. Vigorously conform or subordinate it to his own views
2. Take criticism personally and treat you like an enemy
3. "Improve" upon his articles further and not attribute the new development to you.
*
4. Agree with what sane people are saying.
5. Disagree with what bitter people are saying.


Added on August 4, 2009, 4:16 pm
QUOTE(n00b13 @ Aug 4 2009, 11:07 AM)
You don't even know when you're contradicting yourself, do you?
I have, actually. But if you've never had the balls to approach a gorgeous girl, then you'll probably develop these wrong-headed theories to justify your own ball-lessness and seek validation for them on an anonymous web forum.
*
No im not contradicting myself. Quote the whole paragraph next time wink.gif

And btw, my balls are so big girls gravitate towards it. There is no need to approach when you are approached rclxm9.gif

lololol whistling.gif

This post has been edited by ezralimm: Aug 4 2009, 04:24 PM
ezralimm
post Aug 4 2009, 04:27 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Look guys, I know I've really hit a nerve with some of the things i've said in the past.

Yet debbieyss' comment did strike a chord in me. I will be updating my article... in what shall hopefully be the last incarnation.


I realize that bringing up the role of traits that cannot be changed (eg. height) will piss some people off, and they will use everything to try to discredit me...probably because it makes them feel good.

So, Im going to eliminate that example.


Hopefully the fifth incarnation will be positive and inspiring and far more politically correct.
ezralimm
post Aug 4 2009, 04:54 PM

LGBTQQIP2SAA+
*******
Senior Member
2,715 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(happy4ever @ Aug 4 2009, 04:52 PM)
Attraction comes in many aspects, not necessarily physical. Thats why I say its better to grow in love.
Take time to know the person. In due time, you can accept each other's shortcomings and strengths.


Anyhow, men prefers women to smoke their sosejes, while women prefer men to eat their Fatt Choy sleep.gif

And thats an irrefutable fact!!! sleep.gif
*
Very true.

When you are attractive to the opposite sex. You will find that many people will want to "grow in love" with you. smile.gif There is a reason why attractive people get the right types of attention....and dont have the "always a friend, not a lover" dilemma.

Love grows, and humans are as picky as ever with who they fall in love with - both men and women.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0443sec    0.55    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 02:28 AM