Why no frequency response specs on the page?
PC Audio Edifier Fan Club V2, where great sound comes to life =)
Lowyat.NET -> Price & Dealers Guide -> Inter-Asia (Edifier, Noctua, Bitfenix, Silverstone, Seasonic, Box2s, Doss, Filco)|
|
 Dec 29 2004, 02:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
2,240 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Dec 29 2004, 03:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
2,240 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/pcm1704.html
Guess they're using that BB DAC inside the S2000 amp. Not bad. |
|
|
Dec 30 2004, 03:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
2,240 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(yingfan @ Dec 29 2004, 06:15 PM) hmmm, i think wont be pcm1704, coz it can support up to 192khz, PCM1704 only supports up to 96KHz sample rates. It's stated right in the page. Where did you see 192KHz sample rate supported?while s2000 decoder's spec is up to 96khz only my guess is pcm1716  But I guess you are right. The PCM1716 is much cheaper than the 1704. This post has been edited by DSC: Dec 30 2004, 03:52 PM |
|
|
Jan 12 2005, 04:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
2,240 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
M-series? I wonder how would this be positioned in between the R, E and X series.
|
|
|
Jan 13 2005, 06:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
2,240 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
No tweeter on the sat? That looks like dual midrange drivers to me on the M-Series 5.1 and 2.1.
|
|
|
Jan 16 2005, 03:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
2,240 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
E3100 should be better than the E2100 in sound quality. Real wood sats with tweeter.
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0406sec
 0.68
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 02:13 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.