Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Hardware GPU discussion
|
TSastria
|
 Oct 28 2009, 11:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kirakun @ Oct 29 2009, 02:03 AM) I'm just stating what i see and read. No doubt 280m gtx is a little superior compared to 9800m gtx still the difference is not much to shout about. Check it out at notebookforum for feedbacks on gaming wise Mr. Doctor and Greasemonkey. I do not see the need to PROVE anything here as there are plenty of feedbacks and comments out there waiting for u to open up your eyes and read before stating further comments here. honestly speaking, how much difference are u expecting in the first place??? the GTX 200 series and 9 series uses the same GPU... (in fact, a 9800M GTX is essentially the same as a GTX 260M...) considering there's no change in the architecture of the GPU at all, it's not surprising that the difference is not great... if u compare 9800M GTX and GTX 280M like the way u do for a 9800GTX and GTX 280, i ve nothing to say... |
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Oct 29 2009, 05:49 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(GreaseMonkey90 @ Oct 29 2009, 04:21 PM) nice...i cant even get to 3ghz. always BOD whn it got to 3ghz there's a cheaper alternative to X9100 now... C2D T9900, also 3.06GHz...  |
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 1 2009, 04:34 PM
|
|
|
HD4570...  |
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 3 2009, 01:49 PM
|
|
|
waiting for cloudstrife to get his hands on a Asus UL80Vt...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 4 2009, 06:39 AM
|
|
|
65nm version of GTX 280M...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 4 2009, 10:24 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(kelvin_hata @ Nov 5 2009, 12:34 AM) astria... u didt update my score. oops... pai seh... didn't notice it... my bad... i'll do that tmr.. it's already 1am over here...  |
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 9 2009, 06:32 AM
|
|
|
the jumping is becuz of IDA(Intel Dynamic Acceleration)... it boasts up the multiplier to a higher level when only 1 core is required...
anyway, it's different on 2 instances of CPU-Z is probably becuz IDA was activated for a short period of time, and the CPU-Z on the right did not catch that...
This post has been edited by astria: Nov 9 2009, 06:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 9 2009, 06:46 AM
|
|
|
no it doesn't... it really juz depends on the apps that u re running... this feature was to address the lack of speed of the Core Duo (the predecessor of Core 2) 3yrs ago when running single-threaded apps... back then an older highly clocked Pentium-M can out perform a low clocked CD or even C2D when such apps are ran... so IDA was added to C2D to give it a boost of speed...
Added on November 9, 2009, 6:46 ambtw, updated ur results, waiting for ur 3D Mark 06 screenie... This post has been edited by astria: Nov 9 2009, 06:46 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 9 2009, 08:36 AM
|
|
|
60C for a C2D is really very high...
i only have such temp when playing games... and i am using a T9550...
perhaps there's really not much heatsink to talk abt in the UL80Vt... considering it's size and weight...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 9 2009, 08:41 AM
|
|
|
btw, GreaseMonkey and kelvin's score has been updated... srry for the delay... was and still is busy with exam...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 10 2009, 05:16 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(sianlang @ Nov 10 2009, 04:43 AM) but according to this reviewer the bios overclock doesnt affect anything after u enabled the turbo33 option in windows..looks more like cpuz is reporting error clock speed source: http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=233&t=1296797nah... wat that guy says is that, between Turbo33 and BIOS overclock, u can only choose either of that... |
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 11 2009, 09:16 AM
|
|
|
iirc they have been stuck at 720p starting from the last one...
HD experience is wat they call...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 11 2009, 09:33 AM
|
|
|
doesn't matter... i am giving up hope on NFS series already...
after Underground 2 and Most Wanted, the others have been pretty crap...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 13 2009, 07:39 AM
|
|
|
depends on how demanding u re...
decent for laptops i would say...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 13 2009, 09:34 AM
|
|
|
sure can play, it's juz a matter of how laggy only... but for 4k 3D Mark 06 as a value GPU, it does manage to dish out pretty good performance... at the very least, L4D max settings is not a problem for it...
Added on November 13, 2009, 9:00 pmM1X... pls follow the format as posted by others as well... This post has been edited by astria: Nov 13 2009, 09:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 14 2009, 09:00 AM
|
|
|
it's the 3D Mark one... games ones re fine though... look at the first post of the thread...
there's an example there...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 14 2009, 02:03 PM
|
|
|
HD5000 has been postponed to Q1 2010 due to the difficulty of making 40nm chips by TSMC...
iirc TSMC's 40nm production line can only function at 40% efficiency... even desktop HD5000 is affected now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 18 2009, 06:36 PM
|
|
|
juz tried Catalyst 9.11
minimal changes again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSastria
|
Nov 19 2009, 07:13 PM
|
|
|
i probably used the wrong choice of word, but loki pretty much rephrased wat i wanted to say... my bad...
|
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0239sec
0.21
7 queries
GZIP Disabled