Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V29!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Jul 24 2009, 06:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
402 posts Joined: Apr 2006  
|
Suddenly had the urge to get a full frame camera... luckily I cannot afford it... lol...
Guys, is the Tamron 70-200 f2.8 a good lens ah? I need a superzoom lens... but on the other hand, should I get a macro lens instead? Like the SP90. |
|
|
Jul 25 2009, 12:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
402 posts Joined: Apr 2006
|
QUOTE(Sp00kY @ Jul 24 2009, 06:54 PM) why do you need 200mm and why do you need macro? Actually I need both lah... just no money only. 70-200 is more practical I think... if u can answer that then u know which to get .....both are different purpose lenses  QUOTE(hanafinoor @ Jul 24 2009, 07:30 PM) Tam 70200 a good lens...a good portrait lens too. If u r too keen on macro than sp90 but generally my sp90 is underutilised. Shoot oncein a while only. Hahaha... urge is urge... no money... RM9k wor, of course no noise Urge for full frame? A900? I was surprised of the a900 capability esp in raw format...yesterday I shot with no flashgun iso1600 lowlight ....in a dewan (anak wayang ...employed by diyana's sister), I was soo surprised that i can hardly find any noise.  QUOTE(neo_lam @ Jul 24 2009, 08:14 PM) just go for Sony 70-200 lah....little G... U rich people... how can compare.... me tamron enough. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0455sec
 0.42
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 06:33 AM |
Quote