Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V29!, The Orange Legion

views
     
Sp00kY
post Aug 6 2009, 02:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(MechaHerc @ Aug 6 2009, 02:03 PM)
that thing i oredi know lol
QUOTE("Templar")
Does Dynax 7 in the discussion ?

It's a FF for sure. and it's a digital oso, and it's sensor size is, well, i donnu, "10 MP" ??

And it's cheap !! lot cheaper than a230 !
laugh.gif  laugh.gif


in here

that why i ask blush.gif
*
dynax 7D is digital, 7 is not

correct kar?:
http://photo.net/equipment/minolta/maxxum7
Sp00kY
post Aug 6 2009, 02:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(albnok @ Aug 6 2009, 02:12 PM)
MechaHerc: All the Alpha mount digital SLRs (KM5D, KM7D, A100-A700) are APS-C except the A850 and A900.

All the Alpha mount film SLRs (Minolta Dynax/Maxxum/Alpha*) are full-frame. I've corrected Templar on this.

However, there were also half-frame film SLRs like the Olympus Pen F, and there was a film format with a smaller size called APS (Advanced Photo System). However that was expensive and didn't sell well.

*a Minolta 7 sold in the USA would be called a Minolta Maxxum 7, in Japan it's called the Minolta Alpha 7, and elsewhere, it's called the Minolta Dynax 7.

SpOOkY: Yes that is the link for the film 7.

Ksano: Yes, I strongly suggest you get the screen protector.
*
QUOTE(Ksano @ Aug 6 2009, 02:23 PM)
so how much is it?
looking at shahinki only got 3rd party one, 
is there orginal one from sony?
*
minolta master cleared the doubts haha....

Ksano: why not get the plastic cover form sony? i think its RM25 or something like that..


when is a 850 coming out la....cant sleep at night lately haha
Sp00kY
post Aug 6 2009, 02:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
wow A900 7.3k+ adi? cheaper than D700 liao!
very attractive price arh...
Sp00kY
post Aug 6 2009, 03:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
achew: I knew it hahah... hey but that subject is too small and facing the other side...that pic can be better (sharper), i see some blue tint on the branch, shot in the morning/evening?dawn/dusk ..

telephoto gives nice bokeh indeed....

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Aug 6 2009, 03:42 PM
Sp00kY
post Aug 7 2009, 02:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(millenia3000 @ Aug 7 2009, 02:26 PM)
sorry kawanku, not free to join them classes, if got wrong tolong tunjukkan....
*
got time then attend lo, else can just ask mr.google. it is good enuf, i attended the class but not much used for me la.smile.gif

just google for DOF/Depth of field or Focal length or dof vs focal length. Should give u sufficient information smile.gif

such as:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/dof2.shtml
Sp00kY
post Aug 7 2009, 03:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(millenia3000 @ Aug 7 2009, 02:41 PM)
no wait, so what i said just now salah ka?  unsure.gif
*
the shallower the DOF the less things u see is basically correct smile.gif...imagine a x-y-z plane..shallow dof will see less Z smile.gif....
Sp00kY
post Aug 7 2009, 06:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(amadeo @ Aug 7 2009, 06:21 PM)
yeah.. underexposed for sure..
*
looks ok on my laptop hehe, LCD well..
i will try it on my CRT tonight smile.gif
something i found out from ur blog, inconsistent colors, wb...the same problem that i am facing too smile.gif
Sp00kY
post Aug 10 2009, 10:03 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
ryzan76: The pics are too cold ..i prefer warmer pics smile.gif
Sp00kY
post Aug 10 2009, 12:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
a700 is running on exmor too right? just wana confirm
Sp00kY
post Aug 10 2009, 01:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
85mm poisonous lens..
Sp00kY
post Aug 10 2009, 01:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
i had a 20mm in my mind this morning too..shud be a nice lens wink.gif
Sp00kY
post Aug 10 2009, 03:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(Ksano @ Aug 10 2009, 02:50 PM)
no need kitty replacement yet tongue.gif
either flash or...

try some other option lense like uwa or telefoto... whether it suit you or not,

if not

then upgrade the kitty to 17-50 2.8 tongue.gif
*
go for primes smile.gif...
20mm, 50mm, 85mm, 135mm, 200mm.... brows.gif brows.gif brows.gif brows.gif brows.gif
Sp00kY
post Aug 10 2009, 03:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(Ksano @ Aug 10 2009, 03:28 PM)
well, can't say that you are totally wrong but,

most newbie fotog will find that prime lens are lousy because of must zoom kaki tongue.gif (I say this because even when I bought baby beercan, the limitation already make me headache + minimum focus distant that is too far)

but I know that most prime lens MFD kinda good (can go close up)
And sometimes It teach you how to creatively compose your shot with its limitation

but if prime 20mm tongue.gif  even I wanna get it hehehe
but if the price no different then UWA... why not get better range ?

as for sharpness issue... for sure I envy those zeiss user  laugh.gif 
haih bila la mau tukar ini kitty jadi 16-80 tongue.gif
*
i tot primes MFD are not that good? nvrm, i may be wrong

there is a saying- once u touch/in-love with primes, U're gone..no cure..
Sp00kY
post Aug 10 2009, 03:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
huh?mini beercan 1m? u sure kar? that is seriously very FAR...
my 55-250 minimum is 1m i adi complain and most 70200 is also ~1m...

50mm are ~0.45m but the new SAL50 1.8 is better smile.gif

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Aug 10 2009, 03:35 PM
Sp00kY
post Aug 12 2009, 02:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
afham, go for 16-35 first la. then tele later biggrin.gif
unless i use alot of tele la...else my main lens shud be better than my tele smile.gif

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Aug 12 2009, 02:32 PM
Sp00kY
post Aug 13 2009, 01:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
for me, i only use RAW when I dont tweak the white balance during shooting and i wana remove noise during PP. other than that, its pretty useless to me~
kul_moo: so why are they shootin gin RAW?

Added on August 13, 2009, 1:30 pm
QUOTE(mcline_007 @ Aug 13 2009, 10:58 AM)
wana to buy sony 50mm F/1.8 SAM price at 550, can get cheper uh?
*
with the super cheap air tickets from air asia u might wana fly to HK to get one. its only HKD700 : heheh

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Aug 13 2009, 01:30 PM
Sp00kY
post Aug 13 2009, 02:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Aug 13 2009, 01:35 PM)
Hahaha i dono. They claim its sharper and produces nicer photos. (: To be honest. I never shot in RAW before? So what? =p
*
hahah seems that they do not trust the onboard chip then smile.gif i recommend a fullframe film SLR then...full controls smile.gif
QUOTE(millenia3000 @ Aug 13 2009, 01:40 PM)
blink.gif  blink.gif but the raw file IS from the same camera you adjusted the creative setting already.  blink.gif  blink.gif
i got the Phottix Plato wireless remote for RM140 at digitalsmania@ plaza pudu... it's good i'd say... http://www.phottix.com/phottix-plato.html
photog sifu spotted.  thumbup.gif
wanna "sound" pro la ed, apa lagi..  laugh.gif
*
not pro la..sharing exp
Sp00kY
post Aug 14 2009, 09:30 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
woe sengkiat!congrat
Sp00kY
post Aug 14 2009, 09:57 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
seng_kiat fast fast poison me with ur new gears smile.gif
Sp00kY
post Aug 14 2009, 11:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(lildaredevil906 @ Aug 14 2009, 11:34 AM)
issnt it supposed to be normal to take around that much and have it to be full?

Coz kan, every pic is already 3mbs++ give or take 3.5mb la * 750 = approx 2.7gb

Unless u take the pictures in a very hi-res, then u do the calculation 1 pic approx 4-5 meg? check ur settings.. i just got my cam and in 1 1/2 days time can snap till 500 and i know i can go 500 more no probs with a 4gb card.

-----

and im LOVIN the cam soo much. For a 1st time user i think that there is alot of settings that can be tweaked to fit the needs. Is it just me? or i find the manual mode more practical to use. The auto mode kinda messes up the feel that im trying to create. Like u know the fuzzy fuzzy feel..

Pic spam of the day.. Takn with a manual mode, the little thing was running too fast towards me and i misfocused.. i not itll end up to be a veryyy cute picture.. Its not perfect.. but im still working on it hahah

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
just my 2 cents.

manual mode is only useful for me when i hook up an external flash...else, i will stick with A,S,P mode...
never use auto mode because to me auto mode in dslr is pretty bad compared to p&s.

fuzzy fuzzy feel? are u referring to bokeh?

i am no expert but in order to create a good picture, it must be at least sharp...the pic u took werent sharp at all, and it felt like its from handphone smile.gif...its ok, u are still very new and we will learn together...sony SSS is a plus, watch out for that hand bar in ur viewfinder and snap it when the handshake is the least.... smile.gif..

apart from that, SSS wont freeze the kids movement, u either need HIGHER shutter speed or a flash... i have problem snapping my nephew with 1/1XX shutter too HEHE..so in the end, i just burst it and choose the sharp ones

Added on August 14, 2009, 11:52 ami remember someone mentioned that b+w is very easy to clean. it can be cleaned with tissue...does that apply to all b+w? or only the pro/mrc version?

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Aug 14 2009, 11:52 AM
« Next Oldest · Photography, Digital Imaging & Video · Next Newest »
 

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0472sec    1.07    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 01:08 PM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.