QUOTE(Ahmike @ Jul 26 2009, 12:13 PM)
A700 + 16-105 (pic 2) + 50mm F1.4 (pic 4)Betul arr?
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V29!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 02:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,059 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: KL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 05:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Masking |
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 05:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,982 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
![]() |
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 05:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,982 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(gizmo_pony @ Jul 25 2009, 11:50 PM) QUOTE(gizmo_pony @ Jul 26 2009, 09:50 AM) Congrates bro .. Try look around alphanatics ... there's CZ1680 for sale too » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Goshh .. love the composition . what lens did u use ? |
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 07:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,631 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong |
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 07:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,884 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Mummy |
QUOTE(cjlai @ Jul 26 2009, 07:04 PM) pic spam Looks like serious vignetting » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « EXIF: [sopiler]Camera Make: SONY Camera Model: DSLR-A300 Image Date: 2009:07:24 22:49:07 Flash Used: No Focal Length: 20.0mm (35mm equivalent: 30mm) Exposure Time: 0.100 s (1/10) Aperture: f/4.0 ISO equiv: 400 White Balance: Auto Metering Mode: Spot Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto)[/sopiler] |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 07:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
bysquashy: its a fisheye
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 07:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,884 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Mummy |
I guess we need to PP it off then
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 07:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,895 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Shah Alam |
any1 using the original sto-fen diffuser? wanted to know, if yours already makes the flash colour turned brown or tungsten.
well, mine did (i'm using the cheap dragonfly brand one |
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 08:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Masking |
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 08:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,557 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Republic of Selayang |
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 08:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(achew @ Jul 26 2009, 05:25 PM) nice shot... thanks for comment, but this shoot are taking using tripod with timer. try hard to make the sun in between me and my wifebut i would prefer to include more sky n take away some shadow from the ground...cos somehow i feel that there is too much shadow in this shot..the sky is brilliant anyway =D |
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 08:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(SHOfrE3zE @ Jul 26 2009, 07:55 PM) any1 using the original sto-fen diffuser? wanted to know, if yours already makes the flash colour turned brown or tungsten. well, mine did (i'm using the cheap dragonfly brand one QUOTE(achew @ Jul 26 2009, 08:28 PM) QUOTE(signither @ Jul 26 2009, 08:31 PM) er.. wat2? i have the cheap one from digitalmania (i think dragonfly) n color gel from albertmind explain more wats going on? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 08:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,895 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Shah Alam |
wow, guess i need to get the original 1, but then again do u guys use the diffuser with TTL & auto zoom settings on your flash unit?
well for the dragonfly brand, physically the diffuser is white in colour but once u flashed with it, the output will turn tungsten. well, i been using it for a couple of months btw. |
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 09:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,745 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Kelana Jaya |
hi all....
before I continue processing more, want to ask whether the following 3 photos after processed from RAW suite your eyes - especially on the exposure and white balance (please look at the photo as whole, not just the subjects All the following 3, I only adjusted the EV from +0.67 to +1 Test #1 (yeah i know the distraction on the left) ![]() Test #2 ![]() Test #3 ![]() |
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 09:16 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 09:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(SHOfrE3zE @ Jul 26 2009, 08:58 PM) wow, guess i need to get the original 1, but then again do u guys use the diffuser with TTL & auto zoom settings on your flash unit? how u check bro? me hard to see the different...well for the dragonfly brand, physically the diffuser is white in colour but once u flashed with it, the output will turn tungsten. well, i been using it for a couple of months btw. QUOTE(chiggy @ Jul 26 2009, 09:10 PM) hi all.... for me the skin tones color n lighting n WB seems well balance *hmm.. where i put the my tissue, my nose start bleeding a little*before I continue processing more, want to ask whether the following 3 photos after processed from RAW suite your eyes - especially on the exposure and white balance (please look at the photo as whole, not just the subjects All the following 3, I only adjusted the EV from +0.67 to +1 |
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 09:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,895 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Shah Alam |
QUOTE(MechaHerc @ Jul 26 2009, 09:16 PM) how u check bro? me hard to see the different... just flash it to a white wall bro tried again, i guess it's normal the image turned a bit tungsten coz i tried using bounce card and it produces the same colour. |
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 09:31 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
QUOTE(chiggy @ Jul 26 2009, 09:10 PM) hi all.... personally i dislike the skintone, but that's just my taste.before I continue processing more, want to ask whether the following 3 photos after processed from RAW suite your eyes - especially on the exposure and white balance (please look at the photo as whole, not just the subjects All the following 3, I only adjusted the EV from +0.67 to +1 try use the eye white as your wb correction point... see what's the result like. |
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 09:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,745 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Kelana Jaya |
QUOTE(soulfly @ Jul 26 2009, 09:31 PM) personally i dislike the skintone, but that's just my taste. hmmmtry use the eye white as your wb correction point... see what's the result like. like this? Test #4a - WB on the eye (gray point) with EV +2/3 ![]() Test #4b - just EV +2/3 ![]() Test #1a ![]() Test #1b - WB on eye white ![]() This post has been edited by chiggy: Jul 26 2009, 09:56 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0271sec
0.52
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 08:25 PM |