hi all .. morning ..

can i join u guys if i have these:



....

whaddaya mean join us? ur already us...

Thanks Guys for the good advise, i will consider A200 and A230L btw my hand is on big size...

pssst... kawan... A200 better wan

woe sengkiat!congrat

since you have big hands, then i'd suggest go straight for a200 or a300.

If you have the extra cash, a300 is a better buy due to the live view and tiltable screen. Certainly makes a difference when you're trying to shoot at difficult angles.

welcome back Seng_Kiat.. can u tell us why. we here love to hear the actual story lol..

This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Aug 14 2009, 10:01 AM

seng_kiat fast fast poison me with ur new gears

Hoping that the Pocket Wizard Plus II delivery will not be postponed...... All the necessary stuffs needed to connect from F58 to PWII are ready....Really want to test the 500m (1600 feet) range....

Congratulations Seng_Kiat and welcome back! Hope you enjoy the colors!

I like these 2.. really nice.. a fly never looked this pretty.. lol

This post has been edited by lildaredevil906: Aug 14 2009, 10:28 AM

How much u bought it?

This post has been edited by hanafinoor: Aug 14 2009, 10:40 AM

I'd go with the 16105

wahhh... congrats and welcome back! hehehe... where's the whitey?? CZ???

This post has been edited by Braynumb: Aug 14 2009, 10:49 AM

Hi guys

Can you guys comment on this lens

Sony SAL18250

Worth Buying?

---

Added on August 14, 2009, 11:26 amwhy 16105?

This post has been edited by wufei: Aug 14 2009, 11:26 AM

got to REPOST coz no respond..hu3..sian2.. :-(

hmm...one more thing..bout the 4GB cf card that i use for my a200...ambik gambr sampai 700++..then full already...is the format of your pix has sumthin to do with it?hmmm..

16105 is a very sharp lense compare to 18250.....
but if ur budget allow then can straight up to cz1680...

It's the best lens I have on my camera
The only drawback is the end of 200mm+ focal length, with brightest aperture at f/6.3 which is dark; the sweet spot at that end would be at f/8.0. Good for travel.

Depend on the quality you pick (Fine, Extra Fine, RAW, RAW + JPEG), and also the resolution megapixel.

This post has been edited by wha7ever: Aug 14 2009, 11:33 AM

issnt it supposed to be normal to take around that much and have it to be full?

Coz kan, every pic is already 3mbs++ give or take 3.5mb la * 750 = approx 2.7gb

Unless u take the pictures in a very hi-res, then u do the calculation 1 pic approx 4-5 meg? check ur settings.. i just got my cam and in 1 1/2 days time can snap till 500 and i know i can go 500 more no probs with a 4gb card.

-----

and im LOVIN the cam soo much. For a 1st time user i think that there is alot of settings that can be tweaked to fit the needs. Is it just me? or i find the manual mode more practical to use. The auto mode kinda messes up the feel that im trying to create. Like u know the fuzzy fuzzy feel..

Pic spam of the day.. Takn with a manual mode, the little thing was running too fast towards me and i misfocused.. i not itll end up to be a veryyy cute picture.. Its not perfect.. but im still working on it hahah



This post has been edited by lildaredevil906: Aug 14 2009, 11:42 AM

i managed to get about 900+ on highest setting if im not mistaken....

seriously bro... if you don't get your answers here sometimes, you got to be rajin a bit and google it up or somethin man!....

and read other posts too, it will answer your question sometimes... hkhk earlier mentioned that if i shoot in raw+jpeg all the time, i'd need a lot of disk space.... so using logic plainly, you can easily understand that size of the photos depend on what format are they in...