QUOTE(xKAIZERUx @ Oct 13 2009, 11:09 PM)
9600 and 9800 is a mid-high end card. this card is placed on lower middle series. so need me to tell you what the verdict?
Added on October 14, 2009, 1:45 am9600 got what? 64 sp right?
our card have 80(that is 16x5dimentional)sp.
16 vs 64, cannot go mah.
QUOTE(Najmods @ Oct 14 2009, 06:39 AM)
9600M got 32 stream processor & 128-bit memory, while 9800M got 96 & 256-bit respectively. Compare that to 80 (16x5) with 64-bit memory. This laptop is entry level, I thought someone with Elite tag on Mobile Computing and Hardware would be at least knowledgeable in this, no offence, so the performance difference should be obvious
Quite clearly the 9600m GT is inferior to the 9800m GT. And so is the 4570 is as well. That I am well aware of. My point here is that the 9600 did not scale very well from Undercover to Shift. I'm asking this merely to find out if it is peculiar to the 9600m GT, since it was on par with the 9800 in Undercover. Again, I'm only using my 9800 as an example because it scaled alright from Undercover to Shift.
So if you read carefully, I'm asking here for a comparison of the
SCALING between the
9600 and the
4570.
I think it's rather unfair of you to think that I'm trying to brag because I have a "big name" laptop, I honestly am not. It's also strange that you should jump to such conclusions without actually bothering to read my post thoroughly. I have better things to do in my life than show off, I'm just interested in the differences in the graphics workload between Undercover and Shift.
Now if we can go back to a civilised discussion on that, it would be very nice indeed