TM's own speed test also this bad!
This post has been edited by BugFace: Jul 19 2009, 10:19 PM
Downtime ●●~Extreme Screamyx Slowdowns V5~●●, ♥Oh yes we love streamyx!♥
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 10:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 21 2009, 07:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
Oh crap... until 5th August? *sigh*
|
|
|
Jul 26 2009, 08:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
Damn, was disconnected. These days sometimes I get disconnected. Used to be damn stable. I checked my SNR/Line Attenuation looks to be ok.
|
|
|
Jul 27 2009, 01:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
Not only speed is not so good, these days its prone to DC as well unlike last time when I could at least keep an ip for days. I checked the SNR / Line Attenuation looks to be ok roughly same as last time but these days I am connected to new DSLAM so I am also stuck in 115.13(3/4/5).xxx.xxx.
I wonder what kind of "upgrades" they do to make things worse each time. Don't they ever learn from mistakes? WTF with experience should make the service better instead its worse. |
|
|
Jul 28 2009, 01:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
Hmm... since when 115.133.xxx.xxx look up changed to include the word static... 115.13(4/5).xxx.xxx does not have the static wording...
REMOTE_HOST=133.115.static.in-addr.arpa REMOTE_ADDR=115.133.203.xxx REMOTE_HOST=134.115.in-addr.arpa REMOTE_ADDR=115.134.184.xxx REMOTE_HOST=135.115.in-addr.arpa REMOTE_ADDR=115.135.56.xxx |
|
|
Jul 28 2009, 07:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
115.133.xxx.xxx should be faster than 115.13(4/5).xxx.xxx I believe the slowest among them is 115.135.xxx.xxx .
I was curious as to why 115.133.xxx.xxx has the static wording, I am wondering could it soon be pulled from normal streamyx users? *shrug* However as of this moment, I am no longer stuck in 115.13x.xxx.xxx ip range anymore. Since I am 4MB Combo user, I requested to get into 218.211.xxx.xxx ip range. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 28 2009, 10:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
Just now had issue coming back online as I can't login luckily manage to login after nearly an hour.
This post has been edited by BugFace: Jul 28 2009, 10:46 PM |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 11:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
Shit its as bad as it is, they now want to cap somemore... crap.
Added on July 31, 2009, 11:49 amWell IMO people shouldn't give them all these cap ideas, everytime we give them these ideas they would use it for their benefit not for ours. You think your speed will suddenly improve? I doubt it. Once this comes about they will try get even more customers without need to actually purchase more bandwidth to cater to for existing users. Remember last time they talk about thottling P2P, see any speed improvement for us after they did? Nope we are still facing crap speed with usual etc problems whenever they "upgrade". This post has been edited by BugFace: Jul 31 2009, 11:49 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2009, 04:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
Those who is attending the meet with TM management in less than 30 mins time? They should ask for clarification on this issue.
I seriously hope this cap thing won't be implemented, but knowing TM... anything for their benefit they will do. Never take the blame for anything. Blame this and that for any problems. *sigh* |
|
|
Aug 9 2009, 02:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
Well I just faced 2 disconnections within 2 mins of each other 15 mins ago. Luckily my router is able to log in without issues unlike last night when I had to call 100 to reset to be able to get in after an hour trying to log in.
|
|
|
Aug 27 2009, 05:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
shermeister how much gig you transfer per month? Damn it I upgrade to 4MB to get better speed and easier downloading, this cap is crap.
|
|
|
Aug 27 2009, 06:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Happy Hunting Grounds, Nirvana |
20gb for 4Mbps line they already kacau you?! That isn't a lot of downloads per month.
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0237sec
0.35
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 01:18 AM |