Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Forex V6

views
     
billytong
post Jan 4 2010, 03:25 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


not possible. world currency is like telling USA and Russia + Europeon Union + China + japan to combine into 1 single country. The posiblity of Human staying in Mars is much higher than this one.
billytong
post Jan 7 2010, 11:03 AM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


if i look from a diff point of view. One would only just doing the regular Tele transfer in and out from the country. Any activities we do outside the countries is not covered by Malaysian law.

It is just like I am buying a big TV satellite dish outside Malaysia using internet but didnt send back home. (Big satellite dish is illegal in Malaysia without license)


I hope this clear u guys enough.
billytong
post Jan 7 2010, 01:10 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


Like wise, those who are worried soo much, they can choose not to trade at all.

IMO, worrying about how to avoid losing in this market is more important than this thing, i find it pointless to continue this part topic
billytong
post Jan 7 2010, 01:42 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(Volatile369 @ Jan 7 2010, 01:37 PM)
Yea, that report will move markets..  drool.gif

What competition is that? anyway congratz there..  biggrin.gif
*

If u are in the wrong side u are toast LOL. Dont toy with NFP tongue.gif
billytong
post Jan 12 2010, 05:00 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(cmk96 @ Jan 12 2010, 04:26 PM)
why do you say FXDD is the market maker? any broker can detect the SL level of its client (if the client set one).
*

When u trade u have 2 SL on each trade, 2 TP on each trade too.

the reason being having this is 1 SL is set to where that is the maximum amount you willing to loss no matter what. Another is in ur mind, if u know u are in the wrong trade, why bother waiting it to hit ur SL instead of taking it out early? The thing is ur SL is in ur mind.

the one Set on the client is for unexpected events like a Sharp drop 20-100pips or TMnet cut off, or PC crash or power outrage. I wouldnt want to imaging that without SL and I know I am wrong about the market, the market turn against me and then the unexpected event happen just 1-2 sec b4 I can close my position.

It is the same for TP. U cant profit without a TP point. watching the market give u 150pips and then come back down to hit ur SL when ur Tmnet is cutting u off. I would rather set something TP realisticly like 50pips to get something and move it bit by bit if the market keep pushing myway.
billytong
post Jan 13 2010, 10:55 AM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(cmk96 @ Jan 12 2010, 05:41 PM)
It seems irrelevant of my question above. anyhow, thanks for the tips.
*

Actually I am just further elaborate what you said. Market maker or ECN is just a different method of broker charging. tongue.gif

______________________________________________________________________

I cant see a reason why people bothering broker trying to hit their SL. I doubt any broker manage to move the market. It is a myth! Name me one major broker that their price feed is >10pips off the actually market price... if a broker is trying to take a trader out from hitting their SL, their price feed should be really off the actual market price.

Just my 2 cents

This post has been edited by billytong: Jan 13 2010, 10:55 AM
billytong
post Jan 13 2010, 07:27 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(rstusa @ Jan 13 2010, 06:30 PM)
Just back from vacation, 1 week didn't read this topic, found that a lot of reply here and saw that billytong bro are back.
*

not really back.... I am still having pro-longed flu since Dec 31...Today it get worst that I cant even focus my mind.... yawns....
billytong
post Jan 16 2010, 10:38 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(rstusa @ Jan 16 2010, 09:44 PM)
Dear all, who else is under USA forex broker MUST read this http://www.forexpeacearmy.com/forex-forum/...-forex-usa.html
*

you know because of that FIFO thing from last year regulation, I had move my Acc from US to UK. Not the mention Uk regulation are much stricter than the US one.

The US Gov is just making sure every major country that is not USA richer.
billytong
post Jan 17 2010, 08:13 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(rstusa @ Jan 17 2010, 01:13 PM)
You mean UK regulation are much more taking care for the clients?
*

In general I think so. I have not read in depth about it. But just looking at the surface alone I can see there is a lot better than what US ones now.

take an example that Uk requires client fund ACC to be segregated, so in the event the broker get into debt issue. Their liability cannot touch Client's fund. *it is more or less something like that as I only read the surface.

To make it even worst, FIFO = means no SL, and then hedging is not allowed in FX for US. I cant see a reason why I shouldnt move away from US. No SL are you kidding me!? With our not so reliable internet line/power line I cant seem to imaging trading without SL. It is a suicide!

No hedging is also one of the major disadvantages for some trading tactics that some user used.

with all that, u tell me how does US be any better than UK?

This post has been edited by billytong: Jan 17 2010, 08:14 PM
billytong
post Jan 20 2010, 09:44 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(VinniJeyaa @ Jan 19 2010, 10:27 PM)
I exercised my previous company's stock options in 2007 and pocketed about RM 30k. Less than 2 weeks, I received 2 calls. 1 was from my  maybank account branch and the other was from BNM itself asking why I had received that amount. They stopped when I told them company stock options.
laugh.gif
*

I just transferred 10K Euro(~RM48-49K) from fxcm. So far no issue from BNM yet.

billytong
post Jan 21 2010, 11:43 AM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(rstusa @ Jan 21 2010, 10:20 AM)
400pips for some ppl maybe margin call already, because they use larger lot size but for some ppl 2000pips they still can hold, just depends on how you trade with it.
*

to further add on that, Leverage does not matter anyway.

a trader "real leverage" is more like total margin used * leverage. tongue.gif
billytong
post Jan 26 2010, 09:18 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Jan 25 2010, 06:11 PM)
We, on the other hand, play with the broker, off the exchange. What we do does not make any market movement.

Understand now?
*

Most major broker are not really that bad, there is enough loser in the market even if u are profit ten of thousands the broker is not gonna rip ur butt off because our profit is pocket change to them. If one with huge (I mean huge here is like profit 6 figure of USD every month) acc start earn lots of money. first thing you probably see is a leverage reduced, then follow by a spread increase, which not so much a big deal, just harder to trade. tongue.gif At the level, ur spread alone is already profitable to brokers. tongue.gif

The particular trader might as well head to Dukascopy, or Interactivebrokers biggrin.gif

just my 2 cents.

This post has been edited by billytong: Jan 26 2010, 09:19 PM
billytong
post Jan 27 2010, 03:56 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(chanlf @ Jan 27 2010, 03:35 PM)
I hold it from last week.

I can not close the trade today and reopen tomorrow, since almost everyday has news.
*

If everything goes as planned from the long term point of view, then it will be rather easy to forcast the fundamentals study. But however, things are not the same in the real world.

1. A politician talking non-sense, implement things, or any actions that doesnt make sense from the economic point of view can make fundamental prediction very hard.
2. A random event from real world can move the market too, things such as natural disaster, a country disaster etc.


The best easiest way is to look at real time and see how the market digest the news/politician speech, then from there u will be a clear direction even without any technical study.


Technical study is to dig what most & majority of trader think.
Fundamental study is to study what likely that these event will shift the majority trader's perception. In this case u look again into technical.

So if u have a trading plan ahead, u have to change ur goal according to the event that has happened.
billytong
post Jan 28 2010, 03:20 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(jurne @ Jan 28 2010, 10:24 AM)
Short Euro since Monday holding well. Lets see where it closes on Friday.
Euro has dropped a lot since December, starting to get attractive to go long. 1.3800 would be nice to Long~
*

Yeah looking at the fundamental behind the dollar, they are no where better than Euro. You just need people to forget the Greece issue and refocus back to USA. But I am not talking about 1.3800 they will be stopping there. One just need this trend to run dry then the next one run opposite direction, it all depends on the fundamental events that noone can predict when it is going to happen.

This post has been edited by billytong: Jan 28 2010, 03:23 PM
billytong
post Jan 29 2010, 08:48 AM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(rstusa @ Jan 29 2010, 08:29 AM)
We won't close the account but the leverage 1:10 will make our account easily margin call. So if CFTC really implement this rule, then must get ready to transfer our account to other country, but still not sure when they'll launch.
*

or we have to reduce our pip/cost sooo much that one will need huge amount of money in an acc to make a living. In the end, only the rich can earn more.

Leverage isnt really an issue. I can trade with 1:700 leverage if I want, it is the number of pips it takes to get a person margin call matters and it also depends on how much the person is risking and where he place his SL.

This post has been edited by billytong: Jan 29 2010, 08:51 AM
billytong
post Jan 30 2010, 09:03 AM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(rstusa @ Jan 29 2010, 09:53 AM)
But if we want to earn more, with leverage 1:700 compare to 1:10, definitely we got the space to open more or larger lot size and the chances to earn more also bigger, if we use 1:10, the margin already used much on our capital, then we can't really open so many lot size in order to earn more. Beside, you said trade with 1:700, are you using IG Markets broker? As i know only this broker provide 1:700 leverage.
*

QUOTE(billytong)
Leverage isnt really an issue. I can trade with 1:700 leverage if I want, it is the number of pips it takes to get a person margin call matters and it also depends on how much the person is risking and where he place his SL.
I did not say anything about trade with IG market hehe tongue.gif. No i did not trade with a small broker, nor 1:700. It is just a mere example only.


For those who think leverage is risk. Let take an example.

2 Accounts,

Account A leverage 1:100, Account B leverage 1:200. Both have 1000USD.
Both open a trade position with no SL. The trade size is 1 lot (at this case, 1USD/pip.)

Who will get margin call first? smile.gif

This post has been edited by billytong: Jan 30 2010, 09:18 AM
billytong
post Jan 31 2010, 11:33 AM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Jan 31 2010, 12:31 AM)
Wrong answer. Since the question stated that both accounts open 1 mini lot (USD1 per pip is only 1 mini lot), account A will need twice the margin as compared to account B. Higher leverage does not make the account gain faster since 1 mini lot will return USD1 per pip, irrespective of leverage. The higher the leverage, the less margin required to open the order.

However, if you look at it at a margin perspective, account B can open 2 mini lots compared to account A for the same amount of margin since it has twice the leverage. If you look at it from this perspective, then account B will get margin call faster than account A since it has open 2 minis and each pip will be USD2 instead of USD1.

Understand?

Most people misunderstood the nature of leverage. Higher leverage does not increase the risk if you are opening orders in the same lot size as a lower leverage account. The risk comes in when you open MORE lots because you have more margin due to higher leverage. The risk is not in the leverage but the number of lots that you open.
*

Which is exactly what I am trying to tell those who use leverage to measure his risk by giving a mere simple example. I guess u had explained the whole thing biggrin.gif

_________________________________________________________________________

The only thing I can relate leverage to risk is = Higher leverage lead people think they got more room to open more trades. If any traders here are in this group, you better restudy your understanding about risk management.

This post has been edited by billytong: Jan 31 2010, 11:36 AM
billytong
post Feb 1 2010, 12:45 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


Let me put leverage in a point form so those who still confuse can understand better. The diff between diff leverage from a trader point of view is...

1. Trader have the freedom to risk more in higher leverage. For example if there is a very very clear trend. it is absolutely nicer to risk more to gain more.
2. Higher Leverage allow to use of less margin if the open trade size that is same size, in other words the trader use less money to earn the same amount money = better ROI.
3. Lower leverage just making sure you loose less money if u ever get margin call. from the previous example, if both Acc A and B is margin called, Acc A have 100USD left, Acc B has 50 USD left. This is one of the few disadvantages of higher leverage, a trder lose more money when they margin call. (IMO if u start accepting the idea of margin call on your acc, you shouldnt be trading forex at all)


At last, The real risk is your % of margin used multiply by leverage.

billytong
post Feb 3 2010, 10:16 AM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


/Selfish mode on

Exactly,especially it is not profitable to wasting time bothering teaching someone holding their hands to success. And I certainly do not want/like 70-80% of my forum PM inbox filled with forex questions.
billytong
post Feb 3 2010, 03:09 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


more like watching the paint dry.... and clawling up the hill....

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0438sec    0.42    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 02:07 PM