Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Filters Talk, Does it really make a different?
|
TSSeng_Kiat
|
Jun 28 2009, 04:20 PM, updated 17y ago
|
|
Hi guys, Let talk about the filters effect .. does it really useful for you? when u will and will not use uv, cpl, etc filter? does a expensive filter like B+W 010M MRC XS- PRO UV HAZE Filter really make difference if compared to cheap hoya uv hmc filter? let talk about it! ..  .. This post has been edited by Seng_Kiat: Jun 28 2009, 04:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSeng_Kiat
|
Jun 28 2009, 05:48 PM
|
|
QUOTE(DanielYee @ Jun 28 2009, 05:43 PM) I'm using B+W XS-Pro filters exclusively on all my lenses. They are slim, and very easy to clean compare to those Hoya SHMCs I used to own. Quality wise, I have to admit... UV filters are the same. I don't know how durable are they as I don't do drop/smash test on my filters. But I will stick to B+W just for the ease to clean them. Hoya filters are really PITA to clean; often leaves smudges and clean marks all over the filter surface. So, all UV filters have the same output no matter expensive or cheap 1? .. the differences are material, and built quality? actually, I am thinking to get a UV filter for my lens .. but have not decide yet should I go to expensive or just cheapo one .. thinking of get one 77mm uv filter with a few step down rings to fit my lenses .. good idea?..
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSeng_Kiat
|
Jun 28 2009, 07:47 PM
|
|
QUOTE(dpenalty @ Jun 28 2009, 07:32 PM) standard lens go for cheap filter ie. Hoya ... prime lens go for expensive filter ie. B+W it is advisable to get step up ring to mount 77mm filter if financial constraint is there any different in photo quality if compared hoya uv hmc filter vs hoya pro 1?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSeng_Kiat
|
Jun 29 2009, 08:34 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Vincent Pang @ Jun 29 2009, 12:33 AM) i did a quick comparison lately when my friend drop by. I try to get the similar angle, sorry didn't use tripod, but i think it's pretty accurate. Result were consistent even though i change angle » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « guess which is which  second from left does look most natural .. btw, what filters were used for the test? ..  ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSeng_Kiat
|
Jun 29 2009, 10:29 AM
|
|
QUOTE(shootkk @ Jun 29 2009, 09:33 AM) UV filters are usually used primarily for protecting the front elements of the lens. There's not much difference in IQ when used in most conditions but cheapo UV filters will tend to give you more problems such as flaring and ghosting when the situation arises. My Hoya UV filter will sometimes give bad ghosting, reflecting sources of light that is outside of the frame. Good UV filters will give you lesser problems with flaring and ghosting but the best IQ you can get is without using any filters. How to tell? Just take off your lens filter and look at the front elements of your lens. Can you see much reflections on it? Now mount your filter and look at it again. See the amount of reflections that is visible now. The more reflective the filter is, the more problems it will give you with flaring and ghosting. Your lens elements is specially coated to minimise problems like flaring or ghosting. That's why they are expensive. Mounting a filter kind of negates the coating's effect on your lens because the glass on the filter will probably not have as good a coating as your lens has. It's a trade off. Most will bear with a little loss of IQ to protect the lens. Most would rather throw away a filter than a lens. Imagine if a drop of soft drink landed on your lens. Wouldn't you prefer the acid in the soft drink to destroy your filter's coating than your lens' coating? Thank you very much for a good explnation.  .. So, I have decided to get a mid range uv filter for my 67mm and 77mm instead of getting high end 77mm and use step down ring to fit 67mm ..  .. Thanks bro for the information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSeng_Kiat
|
Jun 30 2009, 07:28 AM
|
|
guys, morning!
is it cheap, B+W 010M MRC UV HAZE Filter 77mm at RM220 and B+W 010M MRC UV HAZE Filter 67mm at RM160?
are they good? any1 here using B+W 010M MRC UV HAZE Filter?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSeng_Kiat
|
Jun 30 2009, 08:02 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Sp00kY @ Jun 30 2009, 07:41 AM) a good comparison indeep ..  .. Thanks for sharing ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSeng_Kiat
|
Jun 30 2009, 10:21 AM
|
|
QUOTE(dpenalty @ Jun 30 2009, 09:37 AM) Hoya is the best  u sure hoya? I think, it is B+W 72mm 010M UV-Haze MRC in UV ..  .. 0 for less than 320nm while small amount for hoya uv .. I am getting b+w uv today ..  ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSeng_Kiat
|
Jun 30 2009, 11:52 AM
|
|
QUOTE(HiroBoroi @ Jun 30 2009, 10:30 AM) haha .. with your statement above, u made me think twice to get an expensive or cheap one .. haha ..  .. since I own b+w CPL 67mm and dont use it more than 5 minutes since the day I got it a month, I will trade in it with 2 uvs filter with additional RM140, b+w 010m uv haze mrc, 1 is for 77mm and another for 67mm ..  .. a good deal i think ..  ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSeng_Kiat
|
Jun 30 2009, 08:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(HiroBoroi @ Jun 30 2009, 10:30 AM) Kindly post the before and after 200 ringgit plus damage pics. p/s- Err ... normal scenery pics please ... dun wan pic of fluorescent tube la  yeah ... i got the b+w 010m mrc uv haze filter d today afternoon ..  .. i just did a simple comparison between this and cheap hoya uv hmc, i would say b+w has clearer glass .. i will post the pictures of comparison later ..  ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSeng_Kiat
|
Jul 1 2009, 02:29 PM
|
|
QUOTE(hellfire8888 @ Jul 1 2009, 01:52 PM) get the cokin filter set.. cause they come with adapter..so u can use the filter with watever size lens u have. they got soft diffuser, ND, ND grad, polarise, star filter, radial zoom and many more.. how much does it cost?
|
|
|
|
|