QUOTE(albnok @ Jul 3 2009, 03:29 PM)
bennazis: Up to you. Try both and see which color you prefer. For me, Nikon gives a reddish tint on faces. I don't like that reddish tone though some people LOVE it. Too much of a color cast, means you cover up skintones (pink, orange, yellow, if you set your WB correctly, you can see all those colors in skintones when you shoot a face.) This is not something you can easily restore in Photoshop, if you get it wrong.
With the exception of the A230, A330 and A380, you can set your WB and color exactly and precisely in Kelvin temperature from 2500K to 9900K with a color filter of magenta in 9 steps or green in 9 steps.
You are so right about the skintone dude.
I had an assistant who shoots with a D90 for a few wedding jobs. The colour is so just vividly weird (or weirdly vivid, or anything that you could use to elaborate the colour). One thing for sure, I dislike the colour reproduction, it's just not natural looking. It might work for creative purposes, but skintone is not pleasing at all. I don't know how much work to do in RAW processing because haven't tried it before. On the other hand... A700 has more natural colour, but still pleasant enough with those creative styles. Only recently that I shoot RAW exclusively and discovered that the RAW produces way way better images.
Most of the time, speaking about colour preferences is solely depends on own taste. But saying that A has better colour than B and C is just not correct.
I have many friends who are 'budget shooters' and shoot with 3rd party lenses, but they're always amazed with my a700+beercan combo (colour, sharpness & bokeh).
This post has been edited by soulfly: Jul 3 2009, 03:46 PM