Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Was The Apollo Moon Landing True or Fake?, Did we land on the moon?
|
Eved9
|
Jun 24 2009, 05:40 PM
|
New Member
|
I will choose "not sure" for the poll lolx..i've seen many controversies over the hoax, never rili go n investigate the genuineness..i guess if they happened to grasp some soil on the moon for analysis..that could be a solid proof for the true landing?
btw, what i enjoyed over the moon landing project is the anecdote saying that US discovered the moon gravitational force isn't sufficient to let ballpen work so they dumped alot of fund to invent some anti-gravity ballpen...while USSR easily solved the problem by using a pencil...that was funny....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eved9
|
Jun 24 2009, 07:09 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(cherroy @ Jun 24 2009, 05:51 PM) LOL, One question on this ballpen issue, means that we can't write on paper when upside down? We can now trying it out to see whether we can write the paper on upside down position. Ball pen ink doesn't flow back when you put it upside down, right? Because there back of the ink is not open air, just like you turn a bottle/can upside down with a hole straight away with letting chance of flow in the first place, they can't flow out. In ordinary condition when we writing using a ball pen, besides gravitational pull, ballpen ink flow out based on pull of ink itself. (I forgot what is the term right now), vicious flow something like that? lolx, ya i noticed tat,  ..tatz y it's just an anecdote, and more of a joke for dissing US..btw, ur comment enlighten me that i misintepreted the original story..it's not the gravitational force, it's due to the near-vacuum atmosphere lolx..however, it doesn't change the ballpen ink flow issue, i still perceived the viscous flow explanation is right o..i juz correcting it to fit with the originality of the joke, not because of I want to give a condition where experiment is harder to be done o..lolx..
|
|
|
|
|