i have a question that is bugging me. why is it nature always comes in PAIR ? why there are only two gender which is male and female?
Biology Human Evolution
|
|
 Jul 5 2009, 07:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
38 posts Joined: Jun 2009 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jul 8 2009, 07:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
38 posts Joined: Jun 2009
|
there is no such thing as a simple cell.
-its like a hurricane coming through a junkyard and made a 747- discuss. |
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 09:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
38 posts Joined: Jun 2009
|
QUOTE(lin00b @ Jul 8 2009, 09:25 PM) huh? please elaborate show me one cell that is simple. |
|
|
Jul 9 2009, 03:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
38 posts Joined: Jun 2009
|
QUOTE(lin00b @ Jul 9 2009, 12:13 PM) simple and complex is relative. you are the scientist. you should be able to answer that instead of evading my question. compared to multi cellular organism, all single cell organism is simple. compare to single cell eukaryotic organism, all prokaryotic organism is simple. compared to that, viruses are simple. compared to that, free flowing genetic material (those that are theoretically formed at primordial seas) are simple. compared to that, individual carbon chain molecules are simple. compared to that, atoms are simple. ad nauseam.... how did the first cell able to replicated, and on what purpose? what actually really happened in the "premordial soup" as claimed by darwin? i am sure theres techonological advancement now since the past century. dont tell me you still dont know. what kind of scientist are you? if you cant put up a rational argument, then you are no different with the believers who relied on FAITH. |
|
|
Jul 10 2009, 06:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member
38 posts Joined: Jun 2009
|
QUOTE(lin00b @ Jul 10 2009, 12:51 AM) you re not looking at it deep enough. please read more on evolution. what kind of darwinist are you? didnt you read origin of species? darwin did talk about this hot pond even though he didnt dare to explain it further.how do i know you have not read? you say primordial soup as claimed by darwin. darwin said no such thing. and scientists has successfully created primitive RNA-like substance in lab from nothing. Read All About It uh huh. be offensive, that will help you learn.  stop trollingcreating RNA didnt prove anything. on what purpose it replicate? and how and on what purpose did it survived? this experiment already been done since the 50s when they blast the soup repeatedly with some sort of thunder. dont tell me the scientists are stupid. as i expected, most atheist and darwinists cant answer this question. they relied their faith only on their scientists. in a way, they are no different with believers. always evading the question to a melodramatic extent. |
|
|
Jul 10 2009, 02:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Junior Member
38 posts Joined: Jun 2009
|
QUOTE(lin00b @ Jul 10 2009, 07:30 AM) you speak of purpose, as if life has some grand plan to achieve? why life is only available on earth? life is our reality, not THE reality. who defines life? what is life? why life as we know is only in carbon-based form? DNA replication itself show this "life" comes with a purpose. |
|
|
Jul 10 2009, 03:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Junior Member
38 posts Joined: Jun 2009
|
QUOTE(lin00b @ Jul 10 2009, 02:13 PM) how sure are you life is only available on earth? when the furthest we have ever got away is just a mere 15 light hours away. the universe is vast. to think that we are special is nothing but arrogance. even if there is "life" in other galaxy, we would not recognize it as life. why? because they are probably NON-carbon based. how would you recognize them as "life" ? scientists have been looking for water on Mars, why water? because they are expecting carbon-based life form there. which is probably not going to happen. what if those living things are silicone-based? for gods sake, an ion must be living things too. thats why i ask, how do you define "living things"?DNA replication = life has a purpose; i suppose crystal formation shows ions has a purpose? as for meaning of life, such philosophical questions are better served at bvnb than here. This post has been edited by maknyuus: Jul 10 2009, 03:04 PM |
| Change to: |  0.0170sec
 0.35
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 08:10 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.