Biology Human Evolution
|
|
 Jun 21 2009, 05:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
359 posts Joined: Jun 2007 
|
i think there much evidence to debunk evolution theory.....
evolution should happen gradually right..? but where is the fossils that show there a gradual changes or a link to relate each species from one another...there is too many missing link to relate each species.a new species didnt just spring out from the old ones but there should be changes that can be prove through archeology... and if any where is it... correct me if im wrong here ......im here to learn |
|
|
Jun 21 2009, 07:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
359 posts Joined: Jun 2007
|
QUOTE(NicJolin @ Jun 21 2009, 06:43 PM) I wonder what connection do they seek? What difference do they look for in proto-humans? A tail? Hunchback-ish backbone like orangutans? Walks using arms? that is the problem.. you cannot take some theory and turn it into fact without hard evidence and proof....C'mon like what the other had said, if u want to look for significant changes like those, its going to take couple of millions of years there. Don't think we can trace it back that long yah?  anyone could say anything, just because it take even a billion year to see it changes you claimed it to be the facts... how could nature could be so creative.... everything fall into its pieces so precise even it take a billion year .. by randomly, using the method of try and error...... that could be fatal to each species by the end all, species ended up exterminated pardon my english~ |
| Change to: |  0.0223sec
 0.64
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 09:14 PM |
Quote