Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Biology Human Evolution

views
     
befitozi
post Jun 20 2009, 04:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,468 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Earth


QUOTE(marche @ Jun 20 2009, 03:58 PM)
do you really think our ancestor comng from an ape? i dont believe it..
*
See this is where misconception on human evolution comes in. We SHARE the same ancestors as modern apes. We did not evolve from them. Modern apes have evolved too albeit a slower pace.

Fossil evidence clearly shows relation between primates

user posted image

Comparison of modern bone structures(oversized so i put it in spoiler atg)

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by befitozi: Jun 20 2009, 04:03 PM
befitozi
post Jun 20 2009, 04:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,468 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Earth


QUOTE(NicJolin @ Jun 20 2009, 04:19 PM)
We are still having evolution. Most probably the stage of human being would be getting a larger brain and a smaller 'the rest of the body'.

We're emphasizing on mental intelligence more than physical strength
*
With onset of robotics and neural transmittance, we may evolve to have nothing but a brain!

Though problems with reproduction and the joys that come with it may be .. erm .. lost cry.gif
befitozi
post Jun 20 2009, 07:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,468 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Earth


QUOTE(IcyDarling @ Jun 20 2009, 06:44 PM)
they say we evolve from ape, why does ape still exist?
*
Once again, it's misinterpreted. Scroll up for my previous post on this.
befitozi
post Jun 21 2009, 01:46 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,468 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Earth


QUOTE(salimbest83 @ Jun 21 2009, 08:25 AM)
i dislike this concept.. bcoz we all know the 1st human was created is Adam and then Hawa (eve)
not some monkey apes type..
and we do not evolve to be a good super human stuff..no Xmen etc..
the truth is now human become smaller than our great2 ancestor..
and our lifespan oso become shorter than them.. (100y now mean nothing..they barely can walk etc)
like Nabi Nuh A.S ..he lived for 1000 years
Namrud lived for long2 time oso and claimed he's a god bcoz he lived for too long and got .. and there bigger oso
and many more stories about this can be found.
http://smma59.wordpress.com/2006/09/12/prophet-ibrahim-as/
http://www.geocities.com/buahoren/bahtera.html

pls read here for more info..

user posted imageuser posted image
*
I completely reject all religious view regarding origins all life. I shall not continue the next sentence i have in mind because it will offend some people.

I also agree with NicJolin, this is a science discussion. If i remember correctly there is already a discussion on this in RWI based on religious views. So take it there?

QUOTE
its quite offensive you know, at least to me. but then, darwin's theory doesnt only have human evolutions, the main theory is evolution from fish to amphibians to reptile to bird to mammal and finally human.

this might broaden the discussion scope. Its evoluton, discus all of them, im optimistic about this discussion icon_idea.gif

Yeap, all life on earth evolved from single cell organisms.
befitozi
post Jun 21 2009, 03:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,468 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Earth


QUOTE(salimbest83 @ Jun 21 2009, 03:07 PM)
so u agreed that ur from monkey, ape etc..
thats just ridiculos..


and yes second gen human starting from single cell..
sperm + egg..
not from some cell like in Spore..

Human is the most perfect being that was created by Him.
thats the fact..
*
You're just another misinformed religious fanatic who don't even read up on things before you decide to cast it away due to believe on some ridiculous supreme being.

What pure arrogance you have i thinking human is most perfect. Far from it. Cockroaches are far more adept a species, they have been around for 100million of years and humans have only been around for less then 300000 years.

Fact my ass. Don't bring your religious rhetoric in this with the capital H in him.

This post has been edited by befitozi: Jun 21 2009, 05:24 PM
befitozi
post Jul 10 2009, 05:09 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,468 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Earth


QUOTE(transhumanist92 @ Jul 9 2009, 08:39 PM)
I guess the fossils were put there by God to test your faith.
*
Why can't these religious rhetoric just stay out of this thread doh.gif
befitozi
post Apr 12 2010, 08:51 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,468 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Earth


QUOTE(Blaze_hit @ Apr 12 2010, 08:39 PM)
Gee, thanks for telling me about the khomursan culture but im not sure if it's still being consider as civilization. (i must take notes on this anyway, many thanks) during history class we learned that civilization doesnt have proper definition since it's different among historians.

For instance western historian define civilization as follows:
http://www.historyguide.org/ancient/lecture1b.html
As for historian like Ibn Khaldun which his theory we focus on during history class, civilization is define as follows:
http://www.isesco.org.ma/english/publicati...itics/Chap3.php
(about why is Mesopotamia and Sumeria being considered as the earliest civilization)
http://www.historiasiglo20.org/egypt/mesopotamia.htm

If u have any evidences regarding the earliest civilization other than Mesopotamia and Sumeria mentioned by historians pls do tell me. I too, want to learn more smile.gif
*
I think you are missing the point.

The gripe is you seem to believe that humans first appear in Mesopotamia and you back that up by saying they are the first few civilizations. The point is, are you saying early humans in Africa are NOT humans simply because they are not 'civilized' ?

Civilization DOES NOT equate existence.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0257sec    0.46    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 05:55 AM