then dont you think during the process or breakdown and rebuilt will be quite painful?
what if part of our atom are lag behind or fly somewhere else?
Physics teleportation, new means of transportation
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 07:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
for me, i dont think it is possible, if we need to teleport, which means we have to be breakdown to atomic size and then transfer us to the other teleport machine?
then dont you think during the process or breakdown and rebuilt will be quite painful? what if part of our atom are lag behind or fly somewhere else? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 11:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(seijiseimura84 @ Jun 20 2009, 08:13 PM) if i am not mistaken, there are malaysia people who works at autralia who able to transport the molecule of light, still remember? So i feel it is possible it might be possible to teleport atomic size matter, but how we exactly break down our cell and tissues from starting point and then reorganize at the destination?if structural break down of human cell is possible, then deadly cancer can be cure for sure by break down part of the body, remove the cancer cell and reorganize it. did i think too far? |
|
|
Jun 21 2009, 11:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(dishwasher @ Jun 21 2009, 03:17 PM) I remember reading something to the effect that teleportation's biggest challenge is: they should do this experiment with space shuttle instead, if they succeed, then in the future the amount of fuel need to sent a space shuttle will be greatly reduce.1. the complexity of breaking down and reforming an object 2. the speed at which such a process can be achieved Point 1. is already hard enough, but even if that is managed, at what speeds can we disintegrate and reconstitute an object? If teleportation is going to take longer that physical travel, then it would be pointless wouldn't it? |
|
|
Jun 21 2009, 11:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(Gravity @ Jun 21 2009, 11:06 PM) yes, really cool but that's only possible between a specific destination, which means point A and point B must have the teleport machine, unlike the space jump where you key in the coordinate of the position you want to go then you "jump" |
|
|
Jun 22 2009, 10:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Jun 22 2009, 01:44 PM) Thats just a single atom in a few nm which it could be a dislocation. then i wonder, what happen if the system when offline or the computer hang in the process? then we got half human? 1 gram of carbons have 6.012 x10^23 atoms,how would the receiver know where to put them back,what orientation? |
| Change to: | 0.0436sec
0.45
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 03:16 AM |