QUOTE(rcracer @ Dec 14 2009, 09:43 PM)
why i chose R3 system was because it was dyno proven, i got mine way back then when the car was firstly launched, back then there were a group of hardcore buggers who couldn't get enough of modding their cars, and they did changed from system to system with different config and each time they did they went for dyno and to the track even, this was before R3 came up with the full set, when R3 did the full set of course they fitted it and it did give them the best bang for buck.
The R3 system is best described as balanced, sure you can get more of one or the other either top end or low end which i didn't want, i wanted balance with good bottom and enough top end. Power delivery is smooth across the rev band, no dead spots. That to me is my criteria in calling a system a proper engineered and tested, no butt dynos, no guess work.
Of course a balanced system might not what you want, you prefer just top speed then of course the R3 system will seem lacking to you. It's all down to what you want.
In terms of manafacturing quality R3 is satisfactory, mandrel bent, smooth welds and painted or coated.
fair enough your view....
the reason why i sort of choose "R3" too its because i want to keep my car warranty... 5 years warranty leh.. sayang la to waste just like that

QUOTE(ck_yoong @ Dec 14 2009, 11:33 PM)
Yeah proton dun spend thousands for R3 RnD just to be beaten by a cap ayam or other brands..
Nowadays you always pay for what you get..
Nothing good comes cheap and nothing cheap comes good learned it the hard way..
nope
it depends...
R3 is not the best.... it is
balanced meaning what R3 ppl think its best for the car...
we as the real drivers of the car might have different requirement...
some prefer more low end at the expense of high end and vice versa....