You see , threads like this ALWAYS pop up whether it be on any website and even this forum whenever a 360 multiplat game "looks" or performs better than a PS3 game (HELLO GHOSTBUSTERS). If its the other way around , it seems not many people actually care or want to bring up the topic . I have not seen any people talking about how the PS3 version of Prototype is supposedly superior to the 360 version while people have been screaming about how ghostbusters on PS3 looks worse than on the 360 .
I read somewhere that in an interview with Valve , they said they develop for the 360 because the architecture is more similiar to the PC architecture compared to the PS3 . Basically this means that programming for the 360 is easier than the PS3 . In summary : Developers are lazy to code for the PS3 because it takes more work .

Also ,

Most multiplatform games are equal on both platforms . I believe that games such as RE5 , SFIV have proven this point . Even if some games look slightly better on the 360 does it even matter ? You usually can barely tell the difference between the 2 versions unless you zoom in 400% and play with a magnifying glass in front of your face.

This post has been edited by Sey: Jun 20 2009, 06:46 PM

There are quite a few articles and forum topics around the net on how the 360 version of Ghostbusters is superior to the PS3 version .

I am a consumer , when i fork out my $$ i expect my product to be something of quality and not something made while the developer is high on booze and picking his nose. If they can't do a decent job at it , then why sell their product at all?


http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/busi...icle6531367.ece
I don't see anything about performance on the PS3 or being hard to code for , or any development difficulties being stated by the Activision boss. All he is stating is the PS3 is expensive , and Sony needs to cut the price or else their attach rate will drop . Personally i do agree with him . Did you even read the article before bringing it up in your post ?

Just FYI he's referring to the PS3 Pricepoint not developing costs.

Fair enough i missed that , but then he also says this

Which is basically saying , Sony should cut the price or else attach rates will drop .

I still think Activision's statement is an empty threat . IIRC its posted on neogaf that 40% of Activision's income comes from Sony platforms .

This post has been edited by Sey: Jun 20 2009, 08:59 PM