Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 CLOSED

views
     
blindbox
post Aug 9 2009, 07:45 AM

Meh
******
Senior Member
1,705 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(alister8 @ Aug 8 2009, 12:46 AM)
need some recommendation choosing between this LCDs or you may suggest me others(except AOC coz can't get it here)

1. Samsung 2494HS
2. Samsung P2370
*
I'm using 2494 HS here. Like all 24" HD monitors, they're actually 23.6"

Let's seee... graphics are marvelous.. no visible annoyance etc.

Text is a bit small compared to 1024x768 on a 17" lcd (be glad that it isn't as small as 22" HD).

Meh I'll just summarize

PROS: great size, graphics, MagicBright (allows you to change brightness+ colours with presetted settings)

CONS: Really annoying LCD buttons. They're touch sensitive but that's not the point here. You CANT SEE WHERE IT IS CUZ THERE'S NO LIGHT(put a few LEDs or something, samsung!)!! sigh. So most of the time I just feel it and remember the touch sensitive spots.

16:10 ratios are dying, good luck finding them. There's benQ G2400W/WD on lowyat, start hoping there's stock. There's also the Samsung 2433BW.
blindbox
post Oct 23 2009, 03:17 AM

Meh
******
Senior Member
1,705 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(BeastX @ Aug 9 2009, 09:13 AM)
To correct you a little ... a typical 17" is 1280x1024 with a dot pitch of 0.264mm .... The Samsung has a dot pitch of 0.2767mm... So at native pixel, text will look slightly bigger on the Samsung...

16:10 is not dying, high end, professional and ultra class still keeping to the ratio.... it is just the (more inferior)TN panels gaining popularity
*
Sorry for replying to a really old post.

I was talking about a CRT monitor. 1024x768 on 17" looks as good (or even better! CRTs are 4:3 not 5:4 it seems) as 1280x1024 on a 17".

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0269sec    0.28    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 01:51 PM