I like the design if compare with 5800 design, but with no 3G?

5800 should have this design.

Only a few differences:

1) No 3G
2) Less internal memory (70mb compare to 81mb for 5800)
3) Smaller screen (2.9 compare to 3.2)
but 4) faster ARM 11

I didn't really care about 2), 3) and 4), but lack of 3G is really a let down.

What really amaze me is its wifi feature. If the price is below RM800, I believe it will be a hit. I wonder about its camera performance.

I know that camera is the same 3.2mp but doesn't means 5530 has the same picture quality.

I already tried with my 5800 camera. One picture with the back cover on, and one with back cover off (take out). Picture with no back cover is much clearer and brighter than with cover.

So, I think the back cover somehow reduce the picture quality. 5530 has almost the same back cover design (no clip camera cover). So probably will face the same problem but may be Nokia come with better hardware.

If with 3G+price below RM1000, this phone surely become hot item.

If I'm not mistaken, N97, 5800 and 5530 use same ARM 11 but different clock like you said. 5530 has higher clock ARM 11 than 5800.

ARM 11 is the processor inside the phone. Even iPhone 3G is using the same processor.

Opss.. sorry. As GPS is not so important feature for me, I miss that point.

I wonder why for a good phone like this is lack of 3G?

Even RM940 is still expensive. I visit one phone shop yesterday. They sell all zitron set. 5800 price at RM11++ while 5530 price at RM1050. Only RM100 diff.

But the design is much better than 5800. If the price is RM800 I surely will buy it.

5530 has better design than 5800 but slightly smaller screen. It also lack of GPS and 3G. But for me, both function is not a must and from my experience with 5800, I seldom use it and can live with out it.

If only the price is cheaper.

Of course better function. I also wait the price going down below RM900.