Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Psychology Correlation of Art & Science, V(^o^)V "sub particle of E=mc2"

views
     
SUSb3ta
post Jul 1 2009, 03:25 AM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


QUOTE(Joey Christensen @ Jun 16 2009, 01:36 PM)


So as for conclusion: Is CORRELATION is SCIENCE or SCIENCE is CORRELATION? V(^o^)V

Regards, Joey~~~

p.s: Okie! Now my brain is all dried up after OC-ing my brain. Better grab a Coke downstairs to chill out!
*
after reading what you posted at 5am, from my understanding of the complication posed by u - i have the opinion that correlation and science are interdependent. i would say CORRELATION is SCIENCE AND SCIENCE is CORRELATION.

the reason? well just look around. take statistics for example. it is a discipline, a science (math based) based on correlation (sometimes).

as there are so many unique cases in science, you can never safely say that science is built on correlation nor correlation is built on science. the fact of the matter is that they often work in interchangeably.

either that or i may have completely misinterpreted your post due to unclear language.

i need sleep.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0149sec    0.14    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 07:58 AM