It's true that there are cases where Intel has a better price/performance price ratio compared to AMD, especially in the dual-core arena.

But now TS is wanting to get a quad-core.

So tell me, are you going to be Intel's advocate and say Intel's quad cores have a better price/performance ratio? If so, then obviously you're either an idiot, an Intel fanboy or both.

As you saying people who invests in AMD are idiots, this clearly means that you're already either an idiot, an Intel fanboy or both. Simply because it has been remarkable how AMD is able to compete with Intel and not just survive the competition with Intel despite being deprived from customers just because Intel played dirty, not to mention Intel is more than 30 times richer than AMD. It's true Intel's Core technology is better, but you must remember that nothing lasts for long in the world of technology. AMD might be happily selling their Athlons X2 which are so much better than Pentium Ds one day and the next day, Intel releases their Core technology and the entire table was turned.

So let me ask you, do you seriously think Intel will stay on top all the time? Do you seriously think that the investments gone into AMD is hopeless?

If you answer is yes... you're an....


IDIOT