i watched a third time at tgv,my verdict they cut quite a lot of footage.

I know I've nitpicked a lot about ROTF. And I'm not the only one. Allow me to say one thing.

A good movie doesn't need so many people to defend it. A good movie defends itself.

ROTF isn't the worst movie. It also isn't the best. I'd say it's an average movie, hampered by its inconsistent plot and some bad editing.

http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/smg-transf...-questions.html

This is a good article, pretty much sums up how poor the plot is. If the producers could answer half of them in the movie itself, it'd have been a great movie for sure

No,the reviewer is being honest.

The whole movie is full of plot holes and lack of proper flow.

How can you make a movie that is just a series of random stuff join up together?

No matter how you try to justify it (robot/alien heaven/whatever) the idea of a robot afterlife is just ridiculous, seriously.

Sci-Fi stories have been done so many times, and they have explored robot/alien subjects enough times. But how many times have they explored the idea of a robot "afterlife"?

I follow sci-fi and fantasy stories, and really enjoy them. But I can't wrap around the idea of robots/aliens having an afterlife.

Simply put,

Idea of Robots/Aliens - Quite preposterous but acceptable.
Idea of Human Afterlife - Preposterous for some but acceptable.
Idea of Robot Afterlife - So preposterous it's funny.

So, we are supposed to believe that Aliens, Predator have Predator heaven? Or that the aliens in Mars Attack go to hell because they attacked Earth?

Come on.

I LOLed at the border checkpoint "problem" he mentioned. After I responded I OMGed the whole nite to find out some viewers DO need to be spoonfed that deep.

imagine this scene in a typical movie:

scene 1: Ali  is eating rice on the dining table
scene 2: Ali is on the couch playing PS3, and the plates washed lying next to the sink.

Common sense told us that Ali might have washed the plate and then proceed to play his PS3. But there exist SOME viewers who might asked "Wow... how did Ali managed to end up playing the PS3. Who washed the plates for him? I don't see his parents around!"

Common sense also let us know Ali has hands and legs and is a typical boy who is ABLE to do housechores with no difficulty. There need not be extra boring scenes on Ali doing his dishes.

The beauty in many movies is that it teaches something new. From TF2 , I never know whats a railgun and its weakness and all. Typical audience wanted to be made known of it so that they wanted complete understanding with no doubts whatsoever by the movie itself, within the limited duration of 2 hours +/- 30 minutes.

Since we're NOT watching 24, I bet the battle scenes between the bots and decepts last longer than 1 hour (but only condensed to less than 30 min). Some audience even question how easy for the deceps to be killed in such short "time". thats movie-watcher-time, NOT the exast timeline in the movie itself.
In most movies involve church wedding, we see it happened and ended in less than 15 minute (with main focus on bride and groom on the altar , ready for their vows). In a real church wedding I been to, I sat there for 2 hours ++ before the groom finally kiss the bride. I dont "impose" this kinda of thinking and criticise wedding scenes in movies are "misleading" coz it doesnt "show all".

Yes, yes  I agree with that as stated before. My question was why did you post those questions/answers up, did you take it from somewhere or did you come up with those questions yourself so you can give those "smart" answers?