so the real conman is Arthur Yap laa
and Daniel Au yong yong is the innocent party?

the A deal with B,
B deal with C
A banked in to C account
C sent item to B

and A loses out

A- D-sport - the one that got conned
B- Arthur Yap - The conman
C- Daniel Au - the one that deals normally with Arthur Yap

THIS makes perfect sense

if true ur a conman, here is how it goes

1. you dealed with Daniel Au yong yong. You wanna buy something from him, whether online or not
2. You act to sell our phone, find a buyer and found it on D-Sport
3. you give D-Sport, Daniel Au's account details.
4. D-Sport banked in to Daniel Au account
5. You claimed to have paid to Daniel
6. Daniel ships out something to you
7. you ignores D-Sport claiming innocense

This plan was almost perfect except for a few things, which i am not gonna say lest to educate further

barring you are guilty or not, does this situation seems plausible or not

cause this is one of the tactics to con people.

---

Added on June 3, 2009, 6:03 pmoh ya ps:

either that ^

or Daniel Au yong yong is a ruse you created through mutual friendship
(ie friends that is in it together)

This post has been edited by mcchin: Jun 3 2009, 06:03 PM