Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Proton Exora Turbo, Available next year!!

views
     
TSSavvy88
post May 27 2009, 07:29 AM, updated 17y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


KUALA LUMPUR 26 Mei - Proton Holdings Bhd. (Proton) yakin jualan kenderaan pelbagai gunanya (MPV) Proton Exora tidak akan terjejas sekiranya syarikat pesaing, Perusahaan Otomobil Kedua Sdn. Bhd. (Perodua) mengeluarkan MPV selewat-lewatnya akhir tahun ini.

Pengarah Urusannya, Datuk Syed Zainal Abidin Syed Tahir berkata, Malaysia mempunyai pasaran terbuka dan menawarkan persaingan yang sengit untuk semua pengeluar kenderaan sama ada tempatan atau antarabangsa.

Beliau berkata, pihaknya tidak berasa bimbang mengenai persaingan yang wujud berikutan setiap pengeluar kenderaan di negara ini mempunyai pasaran khusus masing-masing.

"Selain Perodua, kami turut bersaing dengan syarikat pengeluar kenderaan antarabangsa yang lain dan ia tidak perlu dibimbangkan.

"Kami boleh merancang dan persaingan berkenaan akan memberi rangsangan dan galakkan kepada satu sama lain," katanya.

Buat masa ini, Syed Zainal Abidin berkata, pihaknya hanya memberi fokus kepada pengeluaran Proton Exora yang menerima tempahan yang menggalakkan setakat ini.

Jelasnya, Proton bukan sekadar mengeluarkan kereta berdasarkan pasaran domestik semata-mata sebaliknya pasaran di luar negara.

"Kalau kita keluarkan pasaran domestik sahaja, ia akan memberi nahas kepada kami dalam industri.

"Sebagai salah satu langkah perkembangan perniagaan, Julai ini kita akan lancarkan Proton Exora di Thailand dan negara-negara Asia Barat," katanya.

Ketika ditanya mengenai enjin turbo yang akan diperkenalkan dalam kenderaan Proton Exora, Syed Zainal Abidin memberitahu, ia akan dilakukan pada tahun depan.

Beliau memberitahu, tidak dinafikan bahawa enjin turbo adalah sebahagian daripada pembangunan teknologi enjin Proton.

"Kami mengeluarkan enjin turbo untuk Proton Exora bagi pasaran khusus dan menyasarkan pasaran global. Ini bererti, kalau ada golongan yang memerlukan kenderaan yang berkuasa, turbo adalah penyelesaiannya," ujarnya.

Syed Zainal Abidin memberitahu, Proton akan mengeluarkan kenderaan penumpang hasil kerjasama Mitsubishi Motors Corp of Japan (Mitsubishi) berkeupayaan 1.6 liter pada suku kedua tahun depan.

Katanya, kerjasama dengan Mitsubishi adalah dalam bentuk komponen kenderaan.

"Kita mementingkan produk yang memenuhi cita rasa rakyat," ujarnya.[/QUOTE]


from today's Utusan.


Wow.. got turbo version of Proton exora.. wonder what figure of torque and BHP it will produce.. drool.gif
gkl83
post May 27 2009, 07:38 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,377 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
for local or for export purpose ?

should implement turbo on satria neo 1st.... why do turbo on exora? sweat.gif
TSSavvy88
post May 27 2009, 07:42 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


maybe for export purposes. bcoz people from other country especially in middle east country really need the powerful engine on their vehicle bcoz...their size are BIG!! haha.. laugh.gif
gkl83
post May 27 2009, 07:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,377 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
can launch 1.8 or 2.0 also mah... something like saga BLM have 1.6...

unless proton no enough skills to build bigger engine? rolleyes.gif
ericmaxman
post May 27 2009, 08:01 AM

-
*******
Senior Member
7,951 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
Well, about time really.

On the Exora, I guess Proton has 2 selections. Do a 1.8-2/0 car OR do a turbo version. Well, I guess the turbo version is cheaper.
TSSavvy88
post May 27 2009, 08:07 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


QUOTE(ericmaxman @ May 27 2009, 08:01 AM)
Well, about time really.

On the Exora, I guess Proton has 2 selections. Do a 1.8-2/0 car OR do a turbo version. Well, I guess the turbo version is cheaper.
*
yeah.. the turbo option is cheaper. I don't know why Proton still not produce 1.8 or 2.0 engine, as they are able to make 1.3 and 1.6. emm..maybe still under research?
sphiroth
post May 27 2009, 08:09 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,804 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Savvy88 @ May 27 2009, 08:07 AM)
yeah.. the turbo option is cheaper. I don't know why Proton still not produce 1.8 or 2.0 engine, as they are able to make 1.3 and 1.6. emm..maybe still under research?
*
Its simply not economical to develop several engine with different displacement.
Esky
post May 27 2009, 08:10 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
394 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: JB


Hot running Campro + hot bolt-on turbo option = very hot engine...
nimrod2
post May 27 2009, 08:11 AM

the imba one
*******
Senior Member
2,521 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: UrbanSubangJaya




i dont believe proton does any research la.

the proton sagas they selling is exactly the same as 20 years ago wan.
lykids
post May 27 2009, 08:25 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,533 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ayer Tawar
sounds like caldina in making .........
serigala
post May 27 2009, 08:27 AM

CurSedWolf
******
Senior Member
1,439 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Dungeons of the Wolves



QUOTE(gkl83 @ May 27 2009, 07:38 AM)
for local or for export purpose ?

should implement turbo on satria neo 1st.... why do turbo on exora? sweat.gif
*
caldina GT-4 tongue.gif tongue.gif

This post has been edited by serigala: May 27 2009, 08:27 AM
blackpc
post May 27 2009, 08:55 AM

The Slow & The Curious
*******
Senior Member
2,377 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Bangi/Kajang/KL


QUOTE(gkl83 @ May 27 2009, 07:38 AM)
for local or for export purpose ?

should implement turbo on satria neo 1st.... why do turbo on exora? sweat.gif
*
more torque and hp for people mover maa... neo utk couple je... laugh.gif

hmm.. most probably it'll end up in export market. rclxub.gif
kcng
post May 27 2009, 09:19 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(gkl83 @ May 27 2009, 07:48 AM)
can launch 1.8 or 2.0 also mah... something like saga BLM have 1.6...

unless proton no enough skills to build bigger engine?  rolleyes.gif
*
why make a 1.8/2.0 when a turbo 1.6 has more torque then a 2.0 litre car?
rolleyes.gif

better then some photocopy machine...
rolleyes.gif

saga blm have 1.6 because they already have a 1.6 campro engine what
rolleyes.gif

QUOTE(nimrod2 @ May 27 2009, 08:11 AM)
i dont believe proton does any research la.

the proton sagas they selling is exactly the same as 20 years ago wan.
*
exactly the same?
wow
notworthy.gif

where have u been hiding la?
bai1101
post May 27 2009, 09:26 AM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


"Kami mengeluarkan enjin turbo untuk Proton Exora bagi pasaran khusus dan menyasarkan pasaran global. Ini bererti, kalau ada golongan yang memerlukan kenderaan yang berkuasa, turbo adalah penyelesaiannya," ujarnya.


i believe malaysia also got. may be like Exora SE/GT lol but price sure RM 80k above
sphiroth
post May 27 2009, 09:45 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,804 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kcng @ May 27 2009, 09:19 AM)
exactly the same?
wow
notworthy.gif
*
The NAME. whistling.gif laugh.gif


Added on May 27, 2009, 9:46 am
QUOTE(bai1101 @ May 27 2009, 09:26 AM)
"Kami mengeluarkan enjin turbo untuk Proton Exora bagi pasaran khusus dan menyasarkan pasaran global. Ini bererti, kalau ada golongan yang memerlukan kenderaan yang berkuasa, turbo adalah penyelesaiannya," ujarnya.
i believe malaysia also got. may be like Exora SE/GT lol but price sure RM 80k above
*
Maybe because the power is not adequate for 'big' European people and also driving in snow. hmm.gif

This post has been edited by sphiroth: May 27 2009, 09:46 AM
xin
post May 27 2009, 09:49 AM

Maisonducat Storekeeper
*******
Senior Member
6,549 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE
Syed Zainal Abidin memberitahu, Proton akan mengeluarkan kenderaan penumpang hasil kerjasama Mitsubishi Motors Corp of Japan (Mitsubishi) berkeupayaan 1.6 liter pada suku kedua tahun depan.


i am more interested in this. Will this be the Lancer rebadged as rumoured ? Scalled down engine isee 1.6 ..lol
am_eniey
post May 27 2009, 09:50 AM

✿✿✿✿✿
*******
Senior Member
3,314 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Taman Sri Melati, KL



I thought that their deal with Mitsu has ended.
michael9413
post May 27 2009, 09:50 AM

***@_@***
*******
Senior Member
6,986 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: E-Poh.../Pen-Nang.../Pee-Jay/S.Jaye



double post sorry...

This post has been edited by michael9413: May 27 2009, 09:57 AM
xin
post May 27 2009, 09:53 AM

Maisonducat Storekeeper
*******
Senior Member
6,549 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(am_eniey @ May 27 2009, 09:50 AM)
I thought that their deal with Mitsu has ended.
*
It is on and off all the way like how couples argue lol.
michael9413
post May 27 2009, 09:53 AM

***@_@***
*******
Senior Member
6,986 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: E-Poh.../Pen-Nang.../Pee-Jay/S.Jaye



turbo means drink more petrol....haha...
but how about the Exhaust emission???
CooShyRee
post May 27 2009, 09:55 AM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



i think puttin on a turbo on the campro cps is a good move.. n besides, the tubo on the exora is not meant 2 be 4 absolute horse power gains, i think its more 2wards improving torque n usability on the engine 4 the exora, as we all know theres a lot of complaints bout the exora being underpowered.. so i think this is proton's solution 4 that prob..

besides, its the trend these days 4 car manufacturers.. using small displacement engines but wit forced induction that have the same if not better power output than conventional larger displacement ones.. its especially a big advantage 4 our country where our roadtax is determined by our engine displacement.. so wit this, we get more power, but pay the same roadtax.. so y the complaint???

This post has been edited by CooShyRee: May 27 2009, 09:55 AM
TSSavvy88
post May 27 2009, 10:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


QUOTE(CooShyRee @ May 27 2009, 09:55 AM)
i think puttin on a turbo on the campro cps is a good move.. n besides, the tubo on the exora is not meant 2 be 4 absolute horse power gains, i think its more 2wards improving torque n usability on the engine 4 the exora, as we all know theres a lot of complaints bout the exora being underpowered.. so i think this is proton's solution 4 that prob..

besides, its the trend these days 4 car manufacturers.. using small displacement engines but wit forced induction that have the same if not better power output than conventional larger displacement ones.. its especially a big advantage 4 our country where our roadtax is determined by our engine displacement.. so wit this, we get more power, but pay the same roadtax.. so y the complaint???
*
I agree with that. emm. I think Proton will implement the light pressure turbo, not juz like the turbo in Evo. hmm..sure cannot wait to see the turbocharged Campro CPS engine.. drool.gif
CooShyRee
post May 27 2009, 10:03 AM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



id say get rid of all the normal campro engines n replace em wit cps on the persona, gen2 n saga.. n then for proton's more expensive cars like the exora n the upcoming waja replacement, use this new campro cps turbo instead..
am_eniey
post May 27 2009, 10:07 AM

✿✿✿✿✿
*******
Senior Member
3,314 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Taman Sri Melati, KL



QUOTE(xin @ May 27 2009, 09:53 AM)
It is on and off all the way like how couples argue lol.
*
ok, so which one is the female ?
RCrex
post May 27 2009, 10:17 AM

The man who turn impossible to possible...
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: kuching


but turbo charged engine incurred higher cost that not everyone would interested for such powered engine
n not guarantee the turbo charged cps engine will hav lower FC also

i wonder what spec would proton turbo engine use
normal internal wif BOT kit n run wif a different map in ecu?
turbo size small like L2? boost 0.4bar? tongue.gif
xin
post May 27 2009, 10:23 AM

Maisonducat Storekeeper
*******
Senior Member
6,549 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(am_eniey @ May 27 2009, 10:07 AM)
ok, so which one is the female ?
*
Well i am not sure bout that. IMO P1? younger, pampered by parents(G). tongue.gif
kev da man
post May 27 2009, 10:25 AM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(gkl83 @ May 27 2009, 07:38 AM)
for local or for export purpose ?

should implement turbo on satria neo 1st.... why do turbo on exora? sweat.gif
*
simply because the exora has not much power to lug 7 passengers + luggage up genting or camerons....
xshiro
post May 27 2009, 10:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



when exora comes with 1.6 cps..ppl say underpowered. when proton tells us bout campro turbo now ppl say higher cost la..higher fc la ...hot engine doh.gif

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 27 2009, 10:34 AM
Sichiri
post May 27 2009, 11:11 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,192 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.


I wonder when can we see V8 engines in Proton cars? laugh.gif
CooShyRee
post May 27 2009, 11:13 AM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(RCrex @ May 27 2009, 10:17 AM)
but turbo charged engine incurred higher cost that not everyone would interested for such powered engine
n not guarantee the turbo charged cps engine will hav lower FC also

i wonder what spec would proton turbo engine use
normal internal wif BOT kit n run wif a different map in ecu?
turbo size small like L2? boost 0.4bar? tongue.gif
dude.. bear in mind that turbocharging the current engine will be an expensive development, as im sure the current campro cps engine have 2 be revised wit strengthening the internal parts n also revising the ecu.. but then again, force inducting the current engine will be cheaper than making a new bigger engine, rite??

FC will definitely be more, theres no doubt bout that.. but if u want more power, sumthin's gotta give, rite?? u cant expect same FC but want more power?? dont think it'll be a big increase too, as im sure sure its some low pressure turbo only..

QUOTE(xshiro @ May 27 2009, 10:28 AM)
when exora comes with 1.6 cps..ppl say underpowered. when proton tells us bout campro turbo now ppl say higher cost la..higher fc la ...hot engine doh.gif
hahahahahaha laugh.gif love ya statement there dude.. agree a hunderd n one percent!! thumbup.gif
Jason
post May 27 2009, 11:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,358 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
wah this proton fella damn aksyen la. if government no longer protect local car manufacturer and level the playing ground, proton sudah mati la cause toyotas and hondas will be at almost the same price levels.

cakap besar saja.
xin
post May 27 2009, 11:20 AM

Maisonducat Storekeeper
*******
Senior Member
6,549 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(xshiro @ May 27 2009, 10:28 AM)
when exora comes with 1.6 cps..ppl say underpowered. when proton tells us bout campro turbo now ppl say higher cost la..higher fc la ...hot engine doh.gif
*
Haha, all they want is a 3.0 engine with a turbo super charger that the FC is like a Kancil. rclxms.gif
V12Kompressor
post May 27 2009, 11:20 AM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


just what the exora needs... a forced induction engine.
Ultima
post May 27 2009, 11:22 AM

KiRiSuTe GoMeN
*******
Senior Member
5,197 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Muor....



the one who talk at the press is not the one who goyang kaki.. he's the one who build up proton's image currently..

lets c if hes the man with word..
farghmee
post May 27 2009, 11:24 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: May 2007


PROTON, that's a GOOD MOVE smile.gif

to overcome the minus-points of campro, light pressure boost might help.

if proton do have this tech, later they can improve more.
if proton improves, consumer is the one who gain the most!

1.6liter + FI is ok for basic commute.
3.0liter is ok for adrenalin junkies.

an ant's view
Malaysian is capable of making a force induction engine.

a giraffe's view
Malaysian can do what other do.

an eagle's view
I can recognise Malaysia from here, high above!

kev da man
post May 27 2009, 11:27 AM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


i believe with LPT fuel consumption would be like a normal 1.8 with the power it needs.
atlantis2007
post May 27 2009, 12:25 PM

New Member
******
Senior Member
1,014 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
good move from proton!
I guess campro engine are now matured.

this will make proton to be competitive with other car makers, IF proton having SAME / BETTER QC with other car makers.
First n foremost, they should improve / implement sound proof.
xshiro
post May 27 2009, 01:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



if its cps+turbo. then its good

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 27 2009, 01:54 PM
mockv1per
post May 27 2009, 02:54 PM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
so i guess the new Waja will be based on older generation Lancer..
If they have Exora CPS Turbo, surely they will introduce Satria Neo GTI Turbo as well..

and for some of u who asked about bigger displacement engine from Proton, they will source/collaborate with Petronas, 1.8L to 2.2L E01 family engine.
CooShyRee
post May 27 2009, 03:13 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(mockv1per @ May 27 2009, 02:54 PM)
and for some of u who asked about bigger displacement engine from Proton, they will source/collaborate with Petronas, 1.8L to 2.2L E01 family engine.
really?? unsure.gif i thought that idea was scrapped??
pancovilla
post May 27 2009, 03:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2007

QUOTE(mockv1per @ May 27 2009, 02:54 PM)
so i guess the new Waja will be based on older generation Lancer..
If they have Exora CPS Turbo, surely they will introduce Satria Neo GTI Turbo as well..

and for some of u who asked about bigger displacement engine from Proton, they will source/collaborate with Petronas, 1.8L to 2.2L E01 family engine.
*
I thought that proton rejected previous petronas engine design bcos expensive to build manufaturing plant?Anyways Petronas make rnd on engine is it?or they take from other car manufacutrer 1..Also heard actualy the turbo is RnD with Lotus uk..
nazri86a
post May 27 2009, 04:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
276 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: selangor



i think it will out somewhere in half year 2010
xin
post May 27 2009, 04:04 PM

Maisonducat Storekeeper
*******
Senior Member
6,549 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
so i'll cross my finger and wait till 2010 Q3, hopefully new engine and Lancer rebadge will emerge.
xshiro
post May 27 2009, 04:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(pancovilla @ May 27 2009, 03:31 PM)
I thought that proton rejected previous petronas engine design bcos expensive to build manufaturing plant?Anyways Petronas make rnd on engine is it?or they take from other car manufacutrer 1..Also heard actualy the turbo is RnD with Lotus uk..
*
not anymore. it was in 2006 they sign moi. both proton / petronas develop practical engine based on e01

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 27 2009, 04:07 PM
sphiroth
post May 27 2009, 04:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,804 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(xshiro @ May 27 2009, 01:36 PM)
if its cps+turbo. then its good
*
To save cost, maybe they will turbocharged the non-CPS since LPT can solve the torque dips at low rpm while the high rpm power is already quite good. And to turbocharged an engine with 'stages' like CPS (also VTEC and MIVEC) is not easy.
nazri86a
post May 27 2009, 04:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
276 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: selangor



QUOTE(xin @ May 27 2009, 04:04 PM)
so i'll cross my finger and wait till 2010 Q3, hopefully new engine and Lancer rebadge will emerge.
*
hopefully cool2.gif cool2.gif whistling.gif
xshiro
post May 27 2009, 04:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(sphiroth @ May 27 2009, 04:21 PM)
To save cost, maybe they will turbocharged the non-CPS since LPT can solve the torque dips at low rpm while the high rpm power is already quite good. And to turbocharged an engine with 'stages' like CPS (also VTEC and MIVEC) is not easy.
*
anyway whats the benefit of having both cps and turbo?

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 27 2009, 04:31 PM
shinjite
post May 27 2009, 04:38 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


1.6 CPS turbocharged eh.....

Well, you can roughly guess the figures already within the Malaysian community with BOT Campro 1.6s
xin
post May 27 2009, 05:25 PM

Maisonducat Storekeeper
*******
Senior Member
6,549 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(xshiro @ May 27 2009, 04:27 PM)
anyway whats the benefit of having both cps and turbo?
*
You will get the best of both world, high and low. LPT would solve the low-mid torque (boosts pickup) while CPS boost the mid-high torque giving you a steady climb to max speed. Theorically it is same as Mivec Turbo from Evo lol.
779364
post May 27 2009, 05:38 PM

Starry Starry Night
******
Senior Member
1,696 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Genting Casino Bank Vault



POWARRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!

..................."TURBO SPOOLING PLEASE STANDBY"

I am amazed proton can actually introduce turbo into an engine with variable valve timing.It took BMW engineer the second try on their N-series turbo engine to mate both the Valvetronic technology with turbo on the newly released N55-turbo.Apparently its not cost effective to introduce both tech into the engine since the pumping loss from the exhaust valve can be conpensated by the higher pressured air being pumped into engine.

This post has been edited by 779364: May 27 2009, 05:43 PM
xshiro
post May 27 2009, 05:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(779364 @ May 27 2009, 05:38 PM)
POWARRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!

..................."TURBO SPOOLING PLEASE STANDBY"

I am amazed proton can actually introduce turbo into an engine with variable valve timing.It took BMW engineer the second try on their N-series turbo engine to mate both the Valvetronic technology with turbo on the newly released N55-turbo.
*
please dont misunderstand the last posts. notworthy.gif we dont now yet. im just asking whats the benefit of having both. icon_rolleyes.gif

still im also hoping proton could come up with cps turbo.

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 27 2009, 05:43 PM
779364
post May 27 2009, 05:44 PM

Starry Starry Night
******
Senior Member
1,696 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Genting Casino Bank Vault



QUOTE(xshiro @ May 27 2009, 05:41 PM)
please dont misunderstand the last posts.  notworthy.gif we dont now yet. im just asking whats the benefit of having both. icon_rolleyes.gif
*
I wasnt refering to ur post.I just gave my thoughts on this.Since Exora wont be sold in high volume,the cost benefit does not justify turbocharging the CPS.So I think they will turbo the Non-CPS Campro.
xin
post May 27 2009, 05:54 PM

Maisonducat Storekeeper
*******
Senior Member
6,549 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Maybe they will do it on the non CPS as starters and apply it to Exora while continue on the CPS and if suceeds, maybe Satria Neo will be first to receive CPS turbo.
farghmee
post May 27 2009, 06:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: May 2007


from my reading here in the net/forum:
q4 2010 campro turbo
q2 2010 waja rep model
there are 1.8 & 2.0 (campro?), but not yet commercially available.

sigh..
when DSZ enters the web, less posts can be found from si-fu & 460...
siksa
post May 27 2009, 06:09 PM

T_T
******
Senior Member
1,016 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Will Keep His Word Will Not Buy Exora Now. Lets Hope Its A BOT.
paultantk
post May 27 2009, 06:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
407 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(779364 @ May 27 2009, 05:38 PM)
POWARRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!

..................."TURBO SPOOLING PLEASE STANDBY"

I am amazed proton can actually introduce turbo into an engine with variable valve timing.It took BMW engineer the second try on their N-series turbo engine to mate both the Valvetronic technology with turbo on the newly released N55-turbo.Apparently its not cost effective to introduce both tech into the engine since the pumping loss from the exhaust valve can be conpensated by the higher pressured air being pumped into engine.
*
The Campro Turbo will be based on the regular Campro, not the Campro CPS.

BMW engineers found difficulty adding Valvetronic to the original N54 turbo not because of the turbocharger, but because of direct injection. This is why even the N53 direct injection non-turbo engines do not have Valvetronic. Even on the new MINI Cooper engine, the Cooper normally aspirated engine has Valvetronic but the Cooper S turbo engine adds direct injection and Valvetronic was removed.
SleeplessEyes
post May 27 2009, 06:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,429 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
Here is an imagination.

Imagine the Proton Exora, with turbo, zooms passes you with a "VROOO...PSSST"...sound...

How would u imagine that to be? laugh.gif
kev da man
post May 27 2009, 06:55 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(mockv1per @ May 27 2009, 02:54 PM)
so i guess the new Waja will be based on older generation Lancer..
If they have Exora CPS Turbo, surely they will introduce Satria Neo GTI Turbo as well..

and for some of u who asked about bigger displacement engine from Proton, they will source/collaborate with Petronas, 1.8L to 2.2L E01 family engine.
*
wasnt the E01 design and manufacturing rights sold to some china car company? i wept for the powerhouse when i read that on paultan's site a couple of years back.

QUOTE(779364 @ May 27 2009, 05:38 PM)
POWARRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!

..................."TURBO SPOOLING PLEASE STANDBY"

I am amazed proton can actually introduce turbo into an engine with variable valve timing.It took BMW engineer the second try on their N-series turbo engine to mate both the Valvetronic technology with turbo on the newly released N55-turbo.Apparently its not cost effective to introduce both tech into the engine since the pumping loss from the exhaust valve can be conpensated by the higher pressured air being pumped into engine.
*
in an LPT there is virtually no spooling lag. of course, as a tradeoff, boost isn't high, circa 0.3 to 0.5 bar stock.
AiRBooM
post May 27 2009, 07:03 PM

超低能,勁搞笑
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Sg.Buloh
proton should learn how to walk 1st then only run ...

which means they should implement 1.8 /2.0 engine before they bolt on the turbo on those engine.. whistling.gif

just like airtrek & caldina ... both are 2.0 turbo ... not some god damn 1.6 BOT.. doh.gif
xshiro
post May 27 2009, 07:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(AiRBooM @ May 27 2009, 07:03 PM)
proton should learn how to walk 1st then only run ...

which means they should implement 1.8 /2.0 engine before they bolt on the turbo on those engine..  whistling.gif

just like airtrek & caldina ... both are 2.0 turbo ... not some god damn 1.6 BOT..  doh.gif
*
it doesnt matter which one first anyway
its cheaper and faster to gain performance. like golf gti brows.gif

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 27 2009, 07:12 PM
AiRBooM
post May 27 2009, 07:12 PM

超低能,勁搞笑
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Sg.Buloh
QUOTE(xshiro @ May 27 2009, 08:08 PM)
it doesnt matter which one first anyway
its cheaper and faster to gain performance. like golf gti  brows.gif
*
how can a 1.6 turbo performance compare to Golf GTI performance?! sweat.gif
xshiro
post May 27 2009, 07:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(AiRBooM @ May 27 2009, 07:12 PM)
how can a 1.6 turbo performance compare to Golf GTI performance?!  sweat.gif
*
sorry i meant like those with small 1.4 with TSI. GT version not GTI sorry

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 27 2009, 07:16 PM
sphiroth
post May 27 2009, 07:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,804 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(AiRBooM @ May 27 2009, 07:03 PM)
proton should learn how to walk 1st then only run ...

which means they should implement 1.8 /2.0 engine before they bolt on the turbo on those engine..  whistling.gif

just like airtrek & caldina ... both are 2.0 turbo ... not some god damn 1.6 BOT..  doh.gif
*
If they still trying to walk, how can they compete with other car makers.... hmm.gif
AiRBooM
post May 27 2009, 07:41 PM

超低能,勁搞笑
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Sg.Buloh
QUOTE(xshiro @ May 27 2009, 08:16 PM)
sorry i meant like those with small 1.4 with TSI. GT version not GTI sorry
*
or perhaps polo GTI , but is it totally different story.. coz polo and exora both diff classes...

QUOTE(sphiroth @ May 27 2009, 08:18 PM)
If they still trying to walk, how can they compete with other car makers.... hmm.gif
*
other car makers had already gone thru those process only they reach this level , if proton don't follow the sequence how can they recognize by the world? hmm.gif

This post has been edited by AiRBooM: May 27 2009, 07:42 PM
Niv86
post May 27 2009, 08:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
309 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(AiRBooM @ May 27 2009, 07:41 PM)
or perhaps polo GTI , but is it totally different story.. coz polo and exora both diff classes...
other car makers had already gone thru those process only they reach this level , if proton don't follow the sequence how can they recognize by the world?  hmm.gif
*
the problem is..people think proton move too slow.
they come out CPS after so many years after campro.
they kana trash like hell bash like hell, spit like hell.
now atleast the come out a fast solution and if they put on CPS engine. it would be great.
if they develop 1.8 2.0 will take years to finish. logically and economically its will drag proton's sale to success even longer.
develop 1.8 and 2.0 engine not few months job like developing a car my fren.

Lotus doesnt develop any engine but still recognized by the world.

detomaso
post May 27 2009, 09:01 PM

Newbie
******
Senior Member
1,896 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



proton turbo? my ass!
ammar
post May 27 2009, 09:17 PM

~:"(1)":~
*******
Senior Member
2,090 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: وڠسا ماجو
QUOTE(detomaso @ May 27 2009, 09:01 PM)
proton turbo? my ass!
*
haha marah nampak bang. anti proton ke rclxms.gif
FlamingFox
post May 27 2009, 09:18 PM

o(@_@)o
******
Senior Member
1,344 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


I thought Turbo requires more maintenance? (I dunno ah, I heard only)

I hope they'll put turbos on other of their cars as well, Persona + CPS + Turbo would be the best!

Niv86
post May 27 2009, 09:20 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
309 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(detomaso @ May 27 2009, 09:01 PM)
proton turbo? my ass!
*
lol...why so sensitive.


QUOTE(FlamingFox @ May 27 2009, 09:18 PM)
I thought Turbo requires more maintenance? (I dunno ah, I heard only)

I hope they'll put turbos on other of their cars as well, Persona + CPS + Turbo would be the best!
*
yea Persona CPS +turbo... nice

detomaso
post May 27 2009, 09:21 PM

Newbie
******
Senior Member
1,896 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



QUOTE(ammar @ May 27 2009, 09:17 PM)
haha marah nampak bang. anti proton ke  rclxms.gif
*
idok le. dr dulu teman dok nunggu version forced induction. sampai lani idok juge kuor.. last last main kcar tebo je.
unknown warrior
post May 27 2009, 09:21 PM

/k/ Legend
*******
Senior Member
6,240 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
You know? International car manufacturer fits turbo spec for their sport car model or models built for speed, Malaysia had to choose an MPV? Damn dunggu.
ashburn98
post May 27 2009, 09:23 PM

Runaway train
******
Senior Member
1,570 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(unknown warrior @ May 27 2009, 09:21 PM)
You know? International car manufacturer fits turbo spec for their sport car model or models built for speed, Malaysia had to choose an MPV? Damn dunggu.
*
Because the MPV is underpowered ma.
nazri86a
post May 27 2009, 09:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
276 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: selangor



QUOTE(detomaso @ May 27 2009, 09:21 PM)
idok le. dr dulu teman dok nunggu version forced induction. sampai lani idok juge kuor.. last last main kcar tebo je.
*
xpe main kcar terbo lepas ni leh main campro turbo pulak rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
unknown warrior
post May 27 2009, 09:24 PM

/k/ Legend
*******
Senior Member
6,240 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(ashburn98 @ May 27 2009, 09:23 PM)
Because the MPV is underpowered ma.
*
Then they should design a 1.8 and above cc engine, not fit a turbo and say "problem solved".
detomaso
post May 27 2009, 09:25 PM

Newbie
******
Senior Member
1,896 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



QUOTE(nazri86a @ May 27 2009, 09:24 PM)
xpe main kcar terbo lepas ni leh main campro turbo pulak  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
*
mmg tak r kan. sbb kcar 660 cc pon skang 2xx hp dah on wheel... tongue.gif

kev da man
post May 27 2009, 09:28 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(unknown warrior @ May 27 2009, 09:24 PM)
Then they should design a 1.8 and above cc engine, not fit a turbo and say "problem solved".
*
RnD monies already spent in CPS tongue.gif, but from this standpoint, not bad a solution, considering that they are still lacking of a gearbox to fit their campro engines!!!
have you seen the mounting between the mitsu gearbox and the campro block?
adapter plate FTW!!!!!!!!!!! thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
FlamingFox
post May 27 2009, 09:29 PM

o(@_@)o
******
Senior Member
1,344 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(unknown warrior @ May 27 2009, 09:24 PM)
Then they should design a 1.8 and above cc engine, not fit a turbo and say "problem solved".
*
Like the forumers here say, cost effective purpose.
nazri86a
post May 27 2009, 09:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
276 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: selangor



QUOTE(unknown warrior @ May 27 2009, 09:24 PM)
Then they should design a 1.8 and above cc engine, not fit a turbo and say "problem solved".
*
why not go for turbo?? now its trend for car manufacture hv small cc but put turbo so it eq. power with bigger cc engine
makaveli
post May 27 2009, 09:32 PM

Livin' la Vida Loca
******
Senior Member
1,491 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Pattaya,Thailand Status: Online



sorry la bro..more turbo more saman...the why police wont allow turbo charged on road...the rules must e longgar abit la.then only can.

If proton exora turbo can,then mivec turbo also can..
memeranglaut
post May 27 2009, 09:32 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
actually Proton had developed their own 2.2 and 3.0 litre engine. It built with help of lotus and it is a V6. You might have seen it if you were at the proton technology week last year. it is equiped with VVT for those who are into variable timing.
I had ask the engineer that time and they said all the design are testing had been done but they need to freez it because limited budget. Our market are more into small engine with good fuel efficiency.
rcracer
post May 27 2009, 09:36 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

Some comments make me wonder

Now they offer you turbo complete R&D stock from factory complete with warranty coverage, want or don't want? want means just wait and see, don't want means no need bising, still plenty n/a out there
kev da man
post May 27 2009, 09:45 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(makaveli @ May 27 2009, 09:32 PM)
sorry la bro..more turbo more saman...the why police wont allow turbo charged on road...the rules must e longgar abit la.then only can.

If proton exora turbo can,then mivec turbo also can..
*
your reasoning is baseless. no turbos on the road? = no scoobys, no evos, no skylines, supras, golf GTis, no GSRs in putra/wira/saga/satria. heck, waja can convert to evo, what's a bolt-on soft turbo mod from the factory?

QUOTE(rcracer @ May 27 2009, 09:36 PM)
Some comments make me wonder

Now they offer you turbo complete R&D stock from factory complete with warranty coverage, want or don't want? want means just wait and see, don't want means no need bising, still plenty n/a out there
*
+1
scorgio
post May 27 2009, 09:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,696 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


By putting in a Turbo, it's still a 1.6L.
So roadtax is RM90 mah.
Much more attractive compared to RM300+ for 2L engine.
memeranglaut
post May 27 2009, 09:49 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
mostly proton basher are like that.
when the CPS is not powerfull enough, they want 2.0 engine. Give 2.0 engine then complain minyak kuat anbd expensive road tax. give LPT campro also complain it plain stupid. 1.6 LPT is comparable with 2.0 engine torque and hp with the same type FC but with cheaper roadtax.

ideal car for this pandai people. Buat MPV sendiri.
spec. engine 2.0, fc=viva or kancil, powderfull= Nissan GTR kind of power, handling= lotus elise, badge= TOYOTA (or japan mari),price= tata nano.
kev da man
post May 27 2009, 10:02 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(memeranglaut @ May 27 2009, 09:49 PM)
mostly proton basher are like that.
when the CPS is not powerfull enough, they want 2.0 engine. Give 2.0 engine then complain minyak kuat anbd expensive road tax. give LPT campro also complain it plain stupid. 1.6 LPT is comparable with 2.0 engine torque and hp with the same type FC but with cheaper roadtax.

ideal car for this pandai people. Buat MPV sendiri.
spec. engine 2.0, fc=viva or kancil, powderfull= Nissan GTR kind of power, handling= lotus elise, badge= TOYOTA (or japan mari),price= tata nano.
*
on more real-world estimates, probably about 1.8 comparision la tongue.gif
torque figures are important, not that the CPS engine has no torque, it's not enough in a mpv. FC should be comparable or even better than the current exoras, since the LPT kicks in early, no need to rev higher....
detomaso
post May 27 2009, 10:03 PM

Newbie
******
Senior Member
1,896 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



not to bash about the spec of the engine. i salute that matter. but the matter 'when' they gonna start selling of turbo-ed unit is just a question. keep ppl waiting. it been ages rumors that proton wanna came out with force induction car. till now. nothing.
kev da man
post May 27 2009, 10:04 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(detomaso @ May 27 2009, 10:03 PM)
not to bash about the spec of the engine. i salute that matter. but the matter 'when' they gonna start selling of turbo-ed unit is just a question. keep ppl waiting. it been ages rumors that proton wanna came out with force induction car. till now. nothing.
*
since the kleeman waja hor.... doh.gif

detomaso
post May 27 2009, 10:07 PM

Newbie
******
Senior Member
1,896 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



im ok with the spec. but the question is 'WHEN' hahaha. my gti 1.8 turbo stock from factory never turn up till now. even normal GTI already end it production . kah khak hah..
memeranglaut
post May 27 2009, 10:13 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
add in force induction it either torque or hp. if my memory serve me right the waja campro turbo displayed during the technology week has 170 hp and could be set up to 210 hp. or it could be revised to increased the torque and sacrificing hp. average 2.0 engine output is between 140 hp to 150hp.
if proton put in the lotus made v6 engine 2.2 liter with 200hp on tap, how many will buy it? how much are customer willing to pay? 90k?
bai1101
post May 27 2009, 10:15 PM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


i saw a proton gen2 campro supercharge dyno is 17x PS on the wheel in one of the car magazine
detomaso
post May 27 2009, 10:15 PM

Newbie
******
Senior Member
1,896 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



thinking by tht time got proton got proton motorsport RND bot-ed GTI.. and 'waiting' Proton Edar to launch the model. ekeke.. but only the BOT kit appear costing rm7k ...hehe mana mau fork out cash 7k. hehehe...that time gsr93t only cost less than that. hahaha.
rcracer
post May 27 2009, 10:17 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

also campro turbo is not new, there are a few out there already, and not sloppy output, but the problem is reliability and the tidyness of the work, refinement, this is where an OEM turbo is miles ahead of aftermarket BOTs.
Kampung2005
post May 27 2009, 10:37 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(makaveli @ May 27 2009, 09:32 PM)
sorry la bro..more turbo more saman...the why police wont allow turbo charged on road...the rules must e longgar abit la.then only can.

If proton exora turbo can,then mivec turbo also can..
*
Lancer Evolution 10 is officially sold in Malaysia

Triton, D-Max, Ranger, Hilux, also with turbo, and sold in Malaysia

Subaru Impreza, sold in Malaysia


Added on May 27, 2009, 10:40 pm
QUOTE(memeranglaut @ May 27 2009, 09:49 PM)
mostly proton basher are like that.
when the CPS is not powerfull enough, they want 2.0 engine. Give 2.0 engine then complain minyak kuat anbd expensive road tax. give LPT campro also complain it plain stupid. 1.6 LPT is comparable with 2.0 engine torque and hp with the same type FC but with cheaper roadtax.

ideal car for this pandai people. Buat MPV sendiri.
spec. engine 2.0, fc=viva or kancil, powderfull= Nissan GTR kind of power, handling= lotus elise, badge= TOYOTA (or japan mari),price= tata nano.
*
Malaysian psyche

This post has been edited by Kampung2005: May 27 2009, 10:40 PM
unknown warrior
post May 27 2009, 10:44 PM

/k/ Legend
*******
Senior Member
6,240 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(memeranglaut @ May 27 2009, 10:13 PM)
add in force induction it either torque or hp. if my memory serve me right the waja campro turbo displayed during the technology week has 170 hp and could be set up to 210 hp. or it could be revised to increased the torque and sacrificing hp. average 2.0 engine output is between 140 hp to 150hp.
if proton put in the lotus made v6 engine 2.2  liter with 200hp on tap,  how many will buy it? how much are customer willing to pay? 90k?
*
In case it escapes you, there are many Malaysians who can afford to buy car priced over 90k. Where have you been living? In Kamunting?
xshiro
post May 27 2009, 10:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(unknown warrior @ May 27 2009, 10:44 PM)
In case it escapes you, there are many Malaysians who can afford to buy car priced over 90k. Where have you been living? In Kamunting?
*
yeah then ppl say, pay 100k for proton car? not worth it. why not pay 70-80k and get a vios? tongue.gif and add few thousand u can get vios trd edition

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 27 2009, 10:55 PM
unknown warrior
post May 27 2009, 11:00 PM

/k/ Legend
*******
Senior Member
6,240 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(xshiro @ May 27 2009, 10:53 PM)
yeah then ppl say, pay 100k for proton car? not worth it. why not pay 70-80k and get a vios? tongue.gif and add few thousand u can get vios trd edition
*
Improve the quality, people will buy. Simple reasoning.
memeranglaut
post May 27 2009, 11:08 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
improve the quality is one thing, improving the mindset of typical malaysian is another thing. Quality come with price. For a budget car one need to balance between 'quality' and price.
That kind of question why they freeze that v6 2.2 liter engine are best answered by proton management. 1.6 campro LPT is good enough to give Exora the torque she need IMO.
Kampung2005
post May 27 2009, 11:10 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(memeranglaut @ May 27 2009, 11:08 PM)
improve the quality is one thing, improving the mindset of typical malaysian is another thing. Quality come with price. For a budget car one need to balance between 'quality' and price.
That kind of question why they freeze that v6 2.2 liter engine are best answered by proton management. 1.6 campro LPT is good enough to give Exora the torque she need IMO.
*
I felt 1.6 litre turbo is the best compromise of road tax, power and affordability, not to mention, economic sense

You don't mass produce a 2.0 litre engine just for the MPV, it won't be economical...
kev da man
post May 27 2009, 11:25 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 27 2009, 11:10 PM)
I felt 1.6 litre turbo is the best compromise of road tax, power and affordability, not to mention, economic sense

You don't mass produce a 2.0 litre engine just for the MPV, it won't be economical...
*
actually they should.
which leads us to another dilemma.
will proton lean on the backbone of the campro (CPS and IFAM) for the next 5 years?

they have only two engines = 1.3 and 1.6, in four different market segments doh.gif
Kampung2005
post May 27 2009, 11:28 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(kev da man @ May 27 2009, 11:25 PM)
actually they should.
which leads us to another dilemma.
will proton lean on the backbone of the campro (CPS and IFAM) for the next 5 years?

they have only two engines = 1.3 and 1.6, in four different market segments doh.gif
*
The SENG engine project have displacements ranging from 1.0-litres to 2.4 litres....
kokwai
post May 27 2009, 11:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


The limitation of the current CAMPRO engine block is 1.6L, already max out the bore size.

To make economic sense, adding a Turbo is the best option for Proton to take.
AiRBooM
post May 27 2009, 11:36 PM

超低能,勁搞笑
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Sg.Buloh
QUOTE(memeranglaut @ May 27 2009, 11:13 PM)
add in force induction it either torque or hp. if my memory serve me right the waja campro turbo displayed during the technology week has 170 hp and could be set up to 210 hp. or it could be revised to increased the torque and sacrificing hp. average 2.0 engine output is between 140 hp to 150hp.
if proton put in the lotus made v6 engine 2.2  liter with 200hp on tap,  how many will buy it? how much are customer willing to pay? 90k?
*
2.0 bolt on turbo baru syok mah... like Airtrek turbo and Caldina GT-4 !! tongue.gif
kev da man
post May 27 2009, 11:37 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


yeah, but it's all useless if the same gearboxes were reused for those engines as well.....

looks like they need to get cracking on some serious RnD. frankly speaking, the CPS application to so many car models is getting boring, especially if you used to have the glorified racing arm that is R3.


Added on May 27, 2009, 11:40 pm
QUOTE(AiRBooM @ May 27 2009, 11:36 PM)
2.0 bolt on turbo baru syok mah... like Airtrek turbo and Caldina GT-4 !!  tongue.gif
*
and then the general proton-bashing public will compare its performance, build quality, safety, consumption, blablabla. Seriously, i'm giving a chance to proton to see whether they can win my heart back. till this day, i still say that the original saga was the best proton car evar, long-lasting, easy on maintenance and most of all, actually is a national pride.

This post has been edited by kev da man: May 27 2009, 11:40 PM
AiRBooM
post May 27 2009, 11:42 PM

超低能,勁搞笑
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Sg.Buloh
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 28 2009, 12:10 AM)
I felt 1.6 litre turbo is the best compromise of road tax, power and affordability, not to mention, economic sense

You don't mass produce a 2.0 litre engine just for the MPV, it won't be economical...
*
Remember that... BOT engine not easy to take care... if they still using the same gearbox , i can assure that the engine won't last long , not to mention that service a turbo car not cheap , especially the parts wink.gif
kev da man
post May 27 2009, 11:46 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(AiRBooM @ May 27 2009, 11:42 PM)
Remember that... BOT engine not easy to take care... if they still using the same gearbox , i can assure that the engine won't last long , not to mention that service a turbo car not cheap , especially the parts  wink.gif
*
there are cases where BOT projects are able to last long. the major reason why most fail is because owners could not resist the overboost urge. either that, or attempt to DIY too many subsystems to make it run smoothly without proper tuning e.g. fishtank valves to solve boost spikes.

IMHO if a good directive effort was made to study and produce a BOT system from COE itself, proton's engineers are able to devise a force induction engine without the usual turbo fusses.

OEM turbo-ed engines rarely fail if you keep them maintained, and maintenance usually costs about the same as NA engines too.
bai1101
post May 28 2009, 12:03 AM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


YA IF bot so easy fail..... than there will be a lot of persona/Gen2 BOT fail on the road already....

I believe LPT can serve the engine well with proper tuning to the engine and also gearbox
pancovilla
post May 28 2009, 12:10 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2007

QUOTE(AiRBooM @ May 27 2009, 11:42 PM)
Remember that... BOT engine not easy to take care... if they still using the same gearbox , i can assure that the engine won't last long , not to mention that service a turbo car not cheap , especially the parts  wink.gif
*
is it?i own a triton i dont find that car is expensive to maintain..part?other than oilfilter fuel filter not much prob with the mechanical part..
memeranglaut
post May 28 2009, 12:11 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
proton lotus engine is 2.2 V6 with continuous cam phasing alread yvt give out good amount of 200hp@7250 and 210Nm@5000rpm. Put turbo sum more, how much do u expect? 280hp for a family exora? that is too much raw power. later we see speedy gonzales exora on the run burning the road, then someone complain again.
integrating vvt with turbo is something complex. Not as easy as it may look. Easiest way, ask proton tu buy 2.0 mivec turbo from mitsu.


rcracer
post May 28 2009, 12:17 AM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(AiRBooM @ May 27 2009, 11:42 PM)
Remember that... BOT engine not easy to take care... if they still using the same gearbox , i can assure that the engine won't last long , not to mention that service a turbo car not cheap , especially the parts  wink.gif
*
That's why OEM turbos beat aftermarket BOT ones and remember if it's OEM it's covered by warranty.
AiRBooM
post May 28 2009, 12:19 AM

超低能,勁搞笑
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Sg.Buloh
QUOTE(pancovilla @ May 28 2009, 01:10 AM)
is it?i own a triton i dont find that car is expensive to maintain..part?other than oilfilter fuel filter not much prob with the mechanical part..
*
maybe u r rich ... that's y you don't feel it.. ppl buy proton car as it's really dirt cheap to maintain it tongue.gif
kev da man
post May 28 2009, 12:21 AM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(AiRBooM @ May 28 2009, 12:19 AM)
maybe u r rich ... that's y you don't feel it.. ppl buy proton car as it's really dirt cheap to maintain it  tongue.gif
*
how hard is it to accept the truth that OEM turbo-ed cars are no more expensive to maintain than NA cars? doh.gif
AiRBooM
post May 28 2009, 12:24 AM

超低能,勁搞笑
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Sg.Buloh
QUOTE(kev da man @ May 28 2009, 01:21 AM)
how hard is it to accept the truth that OEM turbo-ed cars are no more expensive to maintain than NA cars? doh.gif
*
whatever... not like i'm gonna buy this exora in the future , i'm just speak out what's in my mind only tongue.gif

as if proton's car in the history no faulty before.... N/A car also so many problem... somemore come out a so called "OEM" turbo MPV? thumbup.gif
xshiro
post May 28 2009, 12:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(AiRBooM @ May 28 2009, 12:24 AM)
whatever... not like i'm gonna buy this exora in the future , i'm just speak out what's in my mind only tongue.gif

as if proton's car in the history no faulty before.... N/A car also so many problem... somemore come out a so called "OEM" turbo MPV?  thumbup.gif
*
whats the problem with todays campro?
bai1101
post May 28 2009, 12:34 AM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


he mean the crank shaff break problem? I though tat one already settle jo...

Hmm weird.... although i no own proton car but i definitely can say proton car already have very less problem compare few year where u can google ton of complain.

Even the latest saga owner among our forumer which also only 1 currently facing major problem since i follow tat thread from v5 till v7.

U dont believe proton tat ur problem... but pls don't bash blindly w/o any fact
memeranglaut
post May 28 2009, 12:34 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
the problem is campro made by proton.it is local made. Local mean not good. imported from japan mean it dem good If campro made by toyo ta or Hon da san then no problem. 1 quarter sen.
xshiro
post May 28 2009, 12:40 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



i thought crank shaft pecah becos of those dragster. normal use wont pecah easily. rectified already.

ok i heard 1 saga blm got serious problem like suddenly stall. thats becos of faulty ecu. now many from blm club also face thing like iafm sounds loud. but no harm la. just sounds bising only. engine still run ok

about neo burnt when driving becos of wiring problem caused by mechanic after servicing the car.

thats all i heard. accesories problem is normal la. what car has zero faulty rates?

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 28 2009, 12:44 AM
bai1101
post May 28 2009, 12:42 AM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


QUOTE(memeranglaut @ May 28 2009, 12:34 AM)
the problem is campro made by proton.it is local made. Local mean not good. imported from japan mean it dem good If campro made by toyo ta or Hon da san then no problem. 1 quarter sen.
*
than this type a guy should no eat nasi lemak, wan tan mee, and bla bla bla ..... there all local made.... =.= later kena poison

There should stay at cave.... cause house,condo,apartment all are build by local contractor (will runtuh)


memeranglaut
post May 28 2009, 01:11 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
i am just being scrastic. get what i mean?
jimmy.soo
post May 28 2009, 01:22 AM

Happy Go Lucky
******
Senior Member
1,050 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL


stop being 1 den laugh.gif
Niv86
post May 28 2009, 12:24 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
309 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(bai1101 @ May 28 2009, 12:34 AM)
he mean the crank shaff break problem? I though tat one already settle jo...

Hmm weird.... although i no own proton car but i definitely can say proton car already have very less problem compare few year where u can google ton of complain.

Even the latest saga owner among our forumer which also only 1 currently facing major problem since i follow tat thread from v5 till v7.

U dont believe proton tat ur problem... but pls don't bash blindly w/o any fact
*
yea..most proton will have accessories problem but not much of major (engine + transmission) problem.
i also agree that there's no perfect vehicle in the world.
even 1 of the news about avanza problem with the wheel alignment which is seems like a factory defect on certain parts.
owner complaint since years ago and i believe not yet done.. since toyota say nothing wrong with it and ignore the owner.

shinjite
post May 28 2009, 01:57 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


My mech condemn campro engines....but if he were to get a Neo, have to use it...laugh.gif
memeranglaut
post May 28 2009, 06:50 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
condemning engine is easy la everybody could do it...compare to building your own engine. brows.gif
campro suk big time la wat....mostly cps..dem suk..how could lauya engine output so big one. 125hp. bbti and bitek is king man. long live toyo and onda.
CooShyRee
post May 28 2009, 06:55 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(shinjite @ May 28 2009, 01:57 PM)
My mech condemn campro engines....but if he were to get a Neo, have to use it...laugh.gif
haha.. u mean he bought a neo??

btw, wat did he condemn bout campro??
HangPC2
post May 28 2009, 07:12 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
408 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: LANGKASUKA مليسيا



user posted image
kev da man
post May 28 2009, 07:15 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


nice, custom super turbocharger.

where did he do it? it's rare to find a clean kit like this

This post has been edited by kev da man: May 28 2009, 07:16 PM
memeranglaut
post May 28 2009, 07:39 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
it is from proton. The prototype campro turbo install into waja. saw it in proton plant shah alam during technology week last year.
mockv1per
post May 28 2009, 07:52 PM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
user posted image
150bhp (max 225 whp?) 240Nm torque... now that surely can make that 'van' accelerate faster.

and another one.. 2.2L 200bhp V6 from Proton.
user posted image

This post has been edited by mockv1per: May 28 2009, 07:53 PM
xshiro
post May 28 2009, 07:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(mockv1per @ May 28 2009, 07:52 PM)
user posted image
150bhp (max 225 whp?) 240Nm torque... now that surely can make that 'van' accelerate faster.

and another one.. 2.2L 200bhp V6 from Proton.
user posted image
*
that v6 looks badass
memeranglaut
post May 28 2009, 08:14 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
let hear basher say after dis... brows.gif
CooShyRee
post May 28 2009, 08:18 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(mockv1per @ May 28 2009, 07:52 PM)
150bhp (max 225 whp?) 240Nm torque... now that surely can make that 'van' accelerate faster.
im sure thats the kinda figure we should be expecting when when the turbocharged exora comes out.. 150hp, but more improtantly 240Nm of torque, thats a nice slug of torque!! provided that its delivered in one nice flat curve.. looks kinda messy, im also sure that the production version will be much neater than this thumbup.gif

QUOTE(xshiro @ May 28 2009, 07:59 PM)
that v6 looks badass
i agree.. it looks mean n agressive, nice!! thumbup.gif

too bad proton dont have the needed funding 2 bring this into production.. sad.gif

This post has been edited by CooShyRee: May 28 2009, 08:19 PM
rcracer
post May 28 2009, 08:19 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

Wonder why they like to use waja as testbed
xshiro
post May 28 2009, 08:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(CooShyRee @ May 28 2009, 08:18 PM)
im sure thats the kinda figure we should be expecting when when the turbocharged exora comes out.. 150hp, but more improtantly 240Nm of torque, thats a nice slug of torque!! provided that its delivered in one nice flat curve.. looks kinda messy, im also sure that the production version will be much neater than this thumbup.gif
i agree.. it looks mean n agressive, nice!! thumbup.gif

too bad proton dont have the needed funding 2 bring this into production.. sad.gif
*
i hope it wont stay as prototype forever. what a waste if they dun release it. brows.gif
if they put turbo on that v6. then they could have a powerful sport car.

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 28 2009, 08:25 PM
AiRBooM
post May 28 2009, 08:24 PM

超低能,勁搞笑
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Sg.Buloh
QUOTE(memeranglaut @ May 28 2009, 09:14 PM)
let hear basher say after dis... brows.gif
*
proton still a proton only.. ok? rclxs0.gif

hahahhaa... just kidding... no offense tongue.gif
xshiro
post May 28 2009, 08:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(rcracer @ May 28 2009, 08:19 PM)
Wonder why they like to use waja as testbed
*
big enough engine bay ?

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 28 2009, 08:38 PM
memeranglaut
post May 28 2009, 08:41 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
why they used waja. bigger and more engine bay perhaps. 2.2 v6 engine, 1.6 campro turbo and mono ngv engine all put into waja. Except for gen2 EVE hybrid, most new tech are being tested on waja.
bai1101
post May 28 2009, 08:44 PM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


may be waja mounting is more easy to modification for testing purpose compare other type smile.gif
CooShyRee
post May 28 2009, 08:47 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(xshiro @ May 28 2009, 08:24 PM)
i hope it wont stay as prototype forever. what a waste if they dun release it.  brows.gif
if they put turbo on that v6. then they could have a powerful sport car.
at the moment, i dont see the chances that proton will be investing on that v6 anytime soon r very big..

y i said so..?? think bout it, proton these days r concentrating 2wards making cheaper smaller cars (coz essentially, this is wat people want these days, or more appropriately, its wat people r able 2 afford these days).. if they were 2 make this v6, the only logical sense is 2 put it in a car the size of perdana or maybe the waja.. both of which r classes of cars that people r currently buying less n less.. as we all know, the waja n perdana r soon 2 be phased out (bout time too, especially 4 the perdana, its a nearly 20yr old design 4 heaven sake!!).. its very unlikely that a lot of people would wanna buy a new waja or perdana even if it has this awesome v6 in it.. the only way i see that would make sense 4 proton 2 further development on this engine if they were 2 make a new waja or a new perdana, which means more money is needed.. so i dont think it makes financial sense at the moment 4 proton 2 put a green light on the development on this engine.. i think proton r on the right track at the moment, improving the current campro engines that is infamous 4 all sorts of major flaws.. i think proton should take this further, they should bring the campro back 2 the drawing board, study its problems, improve it, make it more efficient, more economical, more modern, more reliable.. coz this is the only engine that proton r using for all its new cars now, n its been gettin lots of complaints..

but like u said though, itll be a shame if this v6 were 2 remain a prototype..
memeranglaut
post May 28 2009, 08:53 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
i don't know what is people complain about campro, mine clocked 130k already. nothing change on internal part. The power is going strong as ever. 4 years old car, 130k km..no problem wat...except need to tukar timing belt lah. it is bullet proof engine. fill and go. touching 190km/h is a breeze with this problematic engine. icon_idea.gif
xshiro
post May 28 2009, 08:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



yeah. mostly its not the engine part. mostly due to electronic failure or other wiring problem.

iafm might have problem. not engine problem. nothing fatal. just u got extra sound there. fc not affected/car still smooth.
havent heard bout cps problem yet

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 28 2009, 09:00 PM
memeranglaut
post May 28 2009, 09:15 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
luckly i got cam tak pro one...hahahah..aifm ka...camtakpro ka...cps ka...all are great....speedy gonzales..hahahah..190km/h all the way.
xshiro
post May 28 2009, 09:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(CooShyRee @ May 28 2009, 08:47 PM)
at the moment, i dont see the chances that proton will be investing on that v6 anytime soon r very big..

y i said so..?? think bout it, proton these days r concentrating 2wards making cheaper smaller cars (coz essentially, this is wat people want these days, or more appropriately, its wat people r able 2 afford these days).. if they were 2 make this v6, the only logical sense is 2 put it in a car the size of perdana or maybe the waja.. both of which r classes of cars that people r currently buying less n less.. as we all know, the waja n perdana r soon 2 be phased out (bout time too, especially 4 the perdana, its a nearly 20yr old design 4 heaven sake!!).. its very unlikely that a lot of people would wanna buy a new waja or perdana even if it has this awesome v6 in it.. the only way i see that would make sense 4 proton 2 further development on this engine if they were 2 make a new waja or a new perdana, which means more money is needed.. so i dont think it makes financial sense at the moment 4 proton 2 put a green light on the development on this engine.. i think proton r on the right track at the moment, improving the current campro engines that is infamous 4 all sorts of major flaws.. i think proton should take this further, they should bring the campro back 2 the drawing board, study its problems, improve it, make it more efficient, more economical, more modern, more reliable.. coz this is the only engine that proton r using for all its new cars now, n its been gettin lots of complaints..

but like u said though, itll be a shame if this v6 were 2 remain a prototype..
*
yeah. proton is recovering from loss. i dun see producing hi end car for small market in malaysia gonna help. cheap / family car like saga and persona help boost their sales. so at teh moment we can only see small/medium cars only with little improvement here and there

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 28 2009, 09:37 PM
ammar
post May 28 2009, 09:38 PM

~:"(1)":~
*******
Senior Member
2,090 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: وڠسا ماجو
can't imagine exora with turbo lol..

kepish2, then boom..even we can hear alot of complaints about current proton lineups.

they should give better warranty this time.
Azuma-kun
post May 28 2009, 09:45 PM

Sayonara Toriyama-sensei
*******
Senior Member
8,415 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: Malaysia


It should be soft turbo, no kepish2
ammar
post May 28 2009, 09:49 PM

~:"(1)":~
*******
Senior Member
2,090 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: وڠسا ماجو
lol just my wild imagination.

would be fun to see exora with that kind of sound.
Azuma-kun
post May 28 2009, 10:00 PM

Sayonara Toriyama-sensei
*******
Senior Member
8,415 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: Malaysia


It can be done. dont worry laugh.gif
Later mayb can see exora with GSR whistling.gif
4G93T laugh.gif
kev da man
post May 28 2009, 10:41 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


wastegate and BOV should be recirculated, easy job for mechs to vent them into atmosphere thumbup.gif
! Love Money
post May 29 2009, 08:29 AM

permanently unavailable
*******
Validating
2,073 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: last visited


using low pressure turbo like those 4x4 pickup truck got 'pshhh" sound? hmm.gif i doubt...

even i dun think they wanna install a intercooler...
TSSavvy88
post May 29 2009, 09:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


QUOTE
even i dun think they wanna install a intercooler...
*
intercooler is the must for turbo engine, right? bcoz the engine will produce more power and also more heat. so they need an advance cooling system, which is the intercooler.

kev da man
post May 29 2009, 10:25 AM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(! Love Money @ May 29 2009, 08:29 AM)
using low pressure turbo like those 4x4 pickup truck got 'pshhh" sound? hmm.gif i doubt...

even i dun think they wanna install a intercooler...
*
you have to, its not like supercharging where only higher pressure systems need have an intercooler.
after all, there will be thermal conductivity from the exhaust turbine to the compressor......intercooler nowdays quite affordable mah, RM300 also can find a tiny one for k-car, which would work great on a light pressure turbo.
farghmee
post May 29 2009, 11:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: May 2007


is it intercooler is to cool down the air before coming into the combustion chamber?
cooled air (reduced intake temperature) means more dense air into the engine.
intercooler is a "radiator for intake-air".

forced induction engine will surely operates at higher temperature.
the engine will be cooled with the radiator that we normally know.

na car has 1 radiator (engine radiator)
turbo car has 2 radiators (engine radiator, intake-air radiator)
_____________________________________________________________

that V6 is cun! 8)
nazri86a
post May 29 2009, 03:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
276 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: selangor



1.6 turbo can tapau cheery eastar 2.4 or not aaa... hehe
farghmee
post May 29 2009, 04:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: May 2007


ish..no need tapau2..
enjoy the driving..zip zap 8-)
xin
post May 29 2009, 04:43 PM

Maisonducat Storekeeper
*******
Senior Member
6,549 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
tapau mcD and KFC for me k, drive thru can enjoy driving haha
console
post May 29 2009, 04:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
123 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



QUOTE(farghmee @ May 29 2009, 04:21 PM)
ish..no need tapau2..
enjoy the driving..zip zap 8-)
*
rclxms.gif ..juz tapau nasik goreng lg best.. tongue.gif ...jk jk

If exora come with lpt, feel like proton piss off current exora owner.. smile.gif

xin
post May 29 2009, 04:49 PM

Maisonducat Storekeeper
*******
Senior Member
6,549 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(console @ May 29 2009, 04:45 PM)
rclxms.gif ..juz tapau nasik goreng lg best.. tongue.gif ...jk jk

If exora come with lpt, feel like proton piss off current exora owner.. smile.gif
*
dun think so la, since with the lpt also the price will be leverage higher. So the owners would not feel cheated moreover Proton did said it was to cater certain demands. Maybe a limited edition or so.
CooShyRee
post May 29 2009, 05:13 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



yeah.. i also think that if the exora turbo were 2 come out next yr, the normal exora cps will still be offered.. mind u, surely the turbo version will be more expensive, n proton will surely make it look more sporty inside n outside.. me already imagining exora wit sporty bodykits smile.gif
ramlimohamad
post May 29 2009, 06:50 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2008

http://paultan.org/photo/Proton-Exora-Prestige/

http://paultan.org/photo/Proton-Exora-Prime/

yang ni bile pulak nak keluar
xshiro
post May 29 2009, 06:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



that one concept only. like saga red. never released till today.

maybe gonna be released under SE tag.
! Love Money
post May 29 2009, 06:54 PM

permanently unavailable
*******
Validating
2,073 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: last visited


QUOTE(CooShyRee @ May 29 2009, 05:13 PM)
yeah.. i also think that if the exora turbo were 2 come out next yr, the normal exora cps will still be offered.. mind u, surely the turbo version will be more expensive, n proton will surely make it look more sporty inside n outside.. me already imagining exora wit sporty bodykits smile.gif
*
like caldina? 2.0 non-turbo and 2.0 turbo GT4... this sounds great...
sphiroth
post May 29 2009, 07:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,804 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(CooShyRee @ May 29 2009, 05:13 PM)
yeah.. i also think that if the exora turbo were 2 come out next yr, the normal exora cps will still be offered.. mind u, surely the turbo version will be more expensive, n proton will surely make it look more sporty inside n outside.. me already imagining exora wit sporty bodykits smile.gif
*
Already saw one black Exora with flat black tinted and rims. Sadly, the rims design not really suited IMO.
CooShyRee
post May 29 2009, 07:52 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(! Love Money @ May 29 2009, 06:54 PM)
like caldina? 2.0 non-turbo and 2.0 turbo GT4... this sounds great...
yup, something like that.. but this is only my prediction, dont know wether its really gonna be like that or not.. that said, i very much doubt that proton will completely replace the cps wit turbo campro's.. coz if they did, current exora owners will surely be cross!! tongue.gif

i can imagine already an evora fitted wit bodykit, sumthin like the prime concept.. sporty kit, wit turbocharged engine, in an mpv tongue.gif laugh.gif
SUSmayo
post May 29 2009, 09:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2007

user posted image
jaycee1
post May 30 2009, 09:08 AM

AFK
*******
Senior Member
2,487 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


I certainly look forward to having the Campro turbo in the Exora.

Test drove the Exora several weeks ago, and it was barely acceptable. That 240Nm will definately make it more drivable.


I noticed quite a lot of miss-information about turbo charging is being thrown around. I would have like for posters like these to read before posting. It would really help other forumers, instead of confusing them.

QUOTE(! Love Money @ May 29 2009, 08:29 AM)
using low pressure turbo like those 4x4 pickup truck got 'pshhh" sound? hmm.gif i doubt...

even i dun think they wanna install a intercooler...
*
Small or big turbo has nothing to do with the sound.

QUOTE(Savvy88 @ May 29 2009, 09:22 AM)
intercooler is the must for turbo engine, right? bcoz the engine will produce more power and also more heat. so they need an advance cooling system, which is the intercooler.
*
In intercooler isn't a part of your cooling system. In simplified terms, when you compress air, you generate heat, and the heat must be removed from the intake air charge to improve power and reduce pre-detonation.

! Love Money
post May 30 2009, 09:20 AM

permanently unavailable
*******
Validating
2,073 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: last visited


QUOTE(jaycee1 @ May 30 2009, 09:08 AM)
Small or big turbo has nothing to do with the sound.
*
i know that the sound is actually come from BOV "cing" tongue.gif
but normally low pressure turbo does not need a BOV and it only has internal wastegate... sufficient for the engine to gain low boost...
ericmaxman
post May 30 2009, 10:31 AM

-
*******
Senior Member
7,951 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(mayo @ May 29 2009, 09:46 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Hmm. First gen Waja Campro?
xshiro
post May 30 2009, 10:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



yeah..plain campro
SleeplessEyes
post May 30 2009, 10:40 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,429 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
Seriously if they want to turbo charge an existing production engine, for goodness sakes, they, the manufacturer, should attempt to fabricate a new set of turbo-approved pistons instead of lazily turbo charge a NA engine.

Shouldn't be too hard to just fabricate a new set of pistons with lower compression. I doubt this engine show in the picture are even turbo charged-ready.
kev da man
post May 30 2009, 11:58 AM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(SleeplessEyes @ May 30 2009, 10:40 AM)
Seriously if they want to turbo charge an existing production engine, for goodness sakes, they, the manufacturer, should attempt to fabricate a new set of turbo-approved pistons instead of lazily turbo charge a NA engine.

Shouldn't be too hard to just fabricate a new set of pistons with lower compression. I doubt this engine show in the picture are even turbo charged-ready.
*
i have not seen the campro's pistons in the nekkid flesh, but on certain perodua cars, the pistons are so-called 'turbo-ready', having a dished surface instead of a peaked surface. compression ratio for these engine designs are raised by having a shorter gap between TDP and the top of the combustion chamber (don't know how to explain this, but its like skimming your block). not to be confused by piston stroke.
CooShyRee
post May 30 2009, 01:26 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(kev da man @ May 30 2009, 11:58 AM)
i have not seen the campro's pistons in the nekkid flesh, but on certain perodua cars, the pistons are so-called 'turbo-ready', having a dished surface instead of a peaked surface. compression ratio for these engine designs are raised by having a shorter gap between TDP and the top of the combustion chamber (don't know how to explain this, but its like skimming your block). not to be confused by piston stroke.
as ive said b4, im sure this turbocharged campro is not juz a normal campro wit a bolt on turbo.. 4 sure proton is gonna reinforced the internal parts so it'll be suitable 4 force induction..
finkl1
post May 30 2009, 07:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
379 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
if turbocharged to 140-155hp range still isn't going to make difference.

FC is still going to be affected. I have never heard of a turbocharged car being more fuel efficient.

they should have thought about a good engine bloc before planting a Campro in the MPV.
Let's see if Perodua Passo Passette is more value for money than Exora...

why is perodua a national car also i don't know...
kev da man
post May 30 2009, 08:23 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(finkl1 @ May 30 2009, 07:56 PM)
if turbocharged to 140-155hp range still isn't going to make difference.

FC is still going to be affected. I have never heard of a turbocharged car being more fuel efficient.

they should have thought about a good engine bloc before planting a Campro in the MPV.
Let's see if Perodua Passo Passette is more value for money than Exora...

why is perodua a national car also i don't know...
*
user posted image

50MPG on a 660cc turbocharged 3-banger @ 64kw.

the theory behind better FC due to turbocharging is simple = you depress the throttle pedal lesser and rev lower thanks to the feeling that you have adequate power/acceleration. not everyone revs their cars to the redline, you know...
xshiro
post May 30 2009, 08:26 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



i think its fuel efficient concept - lighter + smaller cc but great power. waste energy from exhaust is properly used to produce power but more fuel pumped in la. but very efficient concept. but its driver habit when driving a turbo car..u know la sweat.gif

This post has been edited by xshiro: May 30 2009, 08:35 PM
ericmaxman
post May 30 2009, 08:39 PM

-
*******
Senior Member
7,951 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(finkl1 @ May 30 2009, 07:56 PM)
if turbocharged to 140-155hp range still isn't going to make difference.

FC is still going to be affected. I have never heard of a turbocharged car being more fuel efficient.

they should have thought about a good engine bloc before planting a Campro in the MPV.
Let's see if Perodua Passo Passette is more value for money than Exora...

why is perodua a national car also i don't know...
*
The P2 MPV cannot be directly compared to the Exora. It is one class smaller. And the price range is below Rm60k.

But in terms of value, perhaps we can only know the car is 100% out. Material quality, fit and finish quality can justify the price, I hope.
Vervain
post May 31 2009, 04:40 AM

Scathach
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(finkl1 @ May 30 2009, 07:56 PM)
if turbocharged to 140-155hp range still isn't going to make difference.

FC is still going to be affected. I have never heard of a turbocharged car being more fuel efficient.

they should have thought about a good engine bloc before planting a Campro in the MPV.
Let's see if Perodua Passo Passette is more value for money than Exora...

why is perodua a national car also i don't know...
*
Some owners claimed the 308 THP is much more efficient than the vti version.

140hp - 155 hp is adequate. What's important is the torque as the car is carrying heavy load
! Love Money
post May 31 2009, 11:38 AM

permanently unavailable
*******
Validating
2,073 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: last visited


QUOTE(ericmaxman @ May 30 2009, 08:39 PM)
The P2 MPV cannot be directly compared to the Exora. It is one class smaller. And the price range is below Rm60k.

But in terms of value, perhaps we can only know the car is 100% out. Material quality, fit and finish quality can justify the price, I hope.
*
but majority malaysian would like to compare in terms of pricing... not much aunty/uncle have basic and general knowledge on car...

but more importantly is that althought the peordua MPV is smaller but it uses a 1.5 DVVT engine... so still better than exora... lets see after the perodua MPV has launched how it will affect the sales of exora...
kev da man
post May 31 2009, 12:23 PM

super lurker
********
All Stars
15,278 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(! Love Money @ May 31 2009, 11:38 AM)
but majority malaysian would like to compare in terms of pricing... not much aunty/uncle have basic and general knowledge on car...

but more importantly is that althought the peordua MPV is smaller but it uses a 1.5 DVVT engine... so still better than exora... lets see after the perodua MPV has launched how it will affect the sales of exora...
*
but can it haul that many people compared to the exora? tongue.gif i'm more concerned on whether the perodua MPV would eat into the avanza's market, or not. time will tell for that one, but let's get back to the topic, shall we?
kwhc89
post Jun 1 2009, 03:13 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(CooShyRee @ May 29 2009, 07:52 PM)
yup, something like that.. but this is only my prediction, dont know wether its really gonna be like that or not.. that said, i very much doubt that proton will completely replace the cps wit turbo campro's.. coz if they did, current exora owners will surely be cross!! tongue.gif

i can imagine already an evora fitted wit bodykit, sumthin like the prime concept.. sporty kit, wit turbocharged engine, in an mpv tongue.gif laugh.gif
*
cant be avoided, either the buyers wait or they just drive 1st. its the same like VW scirocco, they release petrol version. then only release diesel version. so will scirocco's owner bash VW for that?? don think so.

QUOTE(! Love Money @ May 31 2009, 11:38 AM)
but majority malaysian would like to compare in terms of pricing... not much aunty/uncle have basic and general knowledge on car...

but more importantly is that althought the peordua MPV is smaller but it uses a 1.5 DVVT engine... so still better than exora... lets see after the perodua MPV has launched how it will affect the sales of exora...
*
i tot perodua are meant to sell smaller cars?? hmm.gif

QUOTE(kev da man @ May 31 2009, 12:23 PM)
but can it haul that many people compared to the exora? tongue.gif i'm more concerned on whether the perodua MPV would eat into the avanza's market, or not. time will tell for that one, but let's get back to the topic, shall we?
*
avanza's life is at it's end. so toyota doesnt really care about it.
mayb passo sette is to replace avanza..who knows.
pubo
post Jun 1 2009, 03:26 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Valhalla
"Kita mementingkan produk yang memenuhi cita rasa rakyat," ujarnya.

I don't think so hmm.gif . Thats why I love Potong rclxms.gif .

This post has been edited by pubo: Jun 1 2009, 03:38 PM
HangPC2
post Jul 12 2009, 09:04 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
408 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: LANGKASUKA مليسيا



'' Currently Proton is testing the Petronas 2.0 engine on 2 unit of Exora ''



Sources : http://forum.autoworld.com.my/index.php?sh...ic=87475&st=240
bo093
post Jul 12 2009, 10:09 AM

404
******
Senior Member
1,185 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Not Found



why they just.
make a standard 1.6L, 2.0L engine?
isn't it time to raise the bar?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0565sec    1.17    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 07:33 PM