Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
The "extreme Screamyx Slowdowns" V4, Edisi :Extreme International Slowdowns
|
Irzani
|
 May 24 2009, 10:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.254.252] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.254.252: bytes=32 time=1126ms TTL=238
Request timed out.
Reply from 212.58.254.252: bytes=32 time=1126ms TTL=238
Reply from 212.58.254.252: bytes=32 time=1078ms TTL=238
Ping statistics for 212.58.254.252:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1078ms, Maximum = 1126ms, Average = 1110ms QUOTE Pinging www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com [209.131.36.158] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=928ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=974ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=924ms TTL=50
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=979ms TTL=50
Ping statistics for 209.131.36.158:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 924ms, Maximum = 979ms, Average = 951ms  This post has been edited by Irzani: May 24 2009, 11:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Irzani
|
May 25 2009, 12:34 AM
|
|
|
Yahoo and google back to half normal .. QUOTE Pinging www.yahoo.com [209.131.36.158] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=497ms TTL=49
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=495ms TTL=49
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=449ms TTL=49
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=488ms TTL=49
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=437ms TTL=49
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=439ms TTL=49
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=494ms TTL=49
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=445ms TTL=49
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=489ms TTL=49
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=497ms TTL=49
Ping statistics for 209.131.36.158:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 437ms, Maximum = 497ms, Average = 473ms QUOTE Pinging www.google.com [64.233.189.104] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=408ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=461ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=430ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=432ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=476ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=509ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=460ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=508ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=456ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=494ms TTL=239
Ping statistics for 64.233.189.104:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 408ms, Maximum = 509ms, Average = 463ms 50 minute ago average is 900 ms .. I don't see any announcement today .. 
Added on May 25, 2009, 12:38 amNow it's back to normal .. very fast like always .. This post has been edited by Irzani: May 25 2009, 12:38 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Irzani
|
May 25 2009, 07:48 AM
|
|
|
I'm still thinking what to say to the technician today since the speed is back to normal .. last night when it happen, I complaint throught the e-mail and to SKMM with the evidence of ping and speedtest .. . Damn, I hate to say it's already okay even though the speed is not stable especially after work hours ... This post has been edited by Irzani: May 25 2009, 07:52 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Irzani
|
May 29 2009, 05:01 AM
|
|
|
Some of the complaint e-mail send to SKMM and Streamyx never get replied. Should I use BPA (Biro Pengaduan Awam) next?  |
|
|
|
|
|
Irzani
|
Jun 22 2009, 02:40 AM
|
|
|
Am I the only person lagging, or everyone got a smooth connection .. |
|
|
|
|
|
Irzani
|
Jul 8 2009, 08:49 AM
|
|
|
Klang people reporting in too .. some international website is so slow even with a local site Lowyat .. |
|
|
|
|
|
Irzani
|
Jul 8 2009, 10:03 AM
|
|
|
Anyone have lodge a complaint?  |
|
|
|
|
|
Irzani
|
Jul 8 2009, 10:47 AM
|
|
|
11 p.m? I can download 8 GB ... This post has been edited by Irzani: Jul 8 2009, 10:49 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Irzani
|
Jul 11 2009, 12:39 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(ILCorvo @ Jul 11 2009, 12:35 PM) hey how come u get > 1mb speed and i cant even get close to 0.9mb... so unfair If you asked the TM operator about the unfair thing, they will reply "There's no such thing people get more than 1MB for 1 MB package, we never heard of it " This post has been edited by Irzani: Jul 11 2009, 12:39 PM |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0429sec
0.47
7 queries
GZIP Disabled