Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V26!, The Orange Legion

views
     
tanjq87
post May 18 2009, 09:30 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


Which one do you guys prefer ? C&C pls
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
tanjq87
post May 18 2009, 09:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(dingenius3 @ May 18 2009, 09:33 PM)
oiit.. give numbering la next time  tongue.gif  tongue.gif
i like lighting on #2 n #4
i believe i'm free this friday nite  rolleyes.gif
*
opps sorry but it's 1,2,3,4 ma...hehe

QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ May 18 2009, 09:33 PM)
Hahaha DUCKS! Your pet? (:
*
nope, its in my university.

QUOTE(Alexes @ May 18 2009, 09:34 PM)
prefer number 3...
*
3 is from right!
tanjq87
post May 18 2009, 10:07 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


would like to go but not accessible by public transport =.= + exams period!
tanjq87
post May 18 2009, 10:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


yala, why dun have it near lrt station? haha...anyway dun think will join this time.
tanjq87
post May 18 2009, 10:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(achew @ May 18 2009, 10:28 PM)
she wanted to buy a900 + 2470 for me actually..but i told her not to =)
*
wah, ur gf super nice! shocking.gif
tanjq87
post May 19 2009, 12:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


the new alpha(s) cannot trigger f42 and f58 with built in flash! you need HVL-F20AM to trigger them.
Sony new alpha pros and cons

This post has been edited by tanjq87: May 19 2009, 12:46 AM
tanjq87
post May 19 2009, 12:58 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(eddie89 @ May 19 2009, 12:55 AM)
guys,

Any recommendation for 70-300 or 70-300 f/2.8 lens for alpha A200? I am asking on behalf of my friends.

Thanks!
*
If got budget, go for Sony SAL70300G or SAL70200G (f2.8) drool.gif
If low budget, can try Minolta 70210 (beercan) (constant f4)
tanjq87
post May 19 2009, 01:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(albnok @ May 19 2009, 01:04 AM)

tanjq87, wouldn't be so sure about the new Alphas not being able to trigger off-camera flashes - there's nothing in Sony literature that suggests otherwise, and David Kilpatrick has changed his articles from time to time as more updated information comes in.
*
ooook.....hopefully it's not true, or else the new alpha is gonna be suck wei...
tanjq87
post May 19 2009, 01:47 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(ieR @ May 19 2009, 01:41 AM)
i play a lot with wireless flash, even the A300 pop up sometimes is still not enough to trigger wirelessly in daylight (yea i am crazy to strobe at daylight) thus where the HVL-F20AM comes in real handy... at least faster cycle time then popup(4sec) i myself will have a go with HVL-F20AM... since it's a little upper hand for wireless shooter like me...

i am thinking, A200/300/350, will not trigger mounted flash(F42, F58) for triggering wireless flash.

HVL-F20AM is design to able to trigger wireless for A230/330/380/700/900...

but see that A230/330/380 CANNOT use F58 to trigger other wireless flash... (huh???? =.=||||)

i beg Sony to release a Fireware for A200/300/350 to able to use HVL-F20AM for triggering wireless flash... (even thou it doesnt trigger F58) ... else strobist will be boring without HVL-F20AM

i not sure what did i type,.... ignore my grammatic errors....
*
true, i just only knew f58 on a200/300/350 is not able to trigger other wireless flash. Let's hope the f20 can trigger wireless flash on a300 =)
anyway, maybe sony expects those who reach the level where you'll play alot of wireless flash to upgrade to midrange/professional level body like a700/a900?

edited, to those who own f42 before f58, do u feel that f58 is too powerful for direct flash? and also because of the ability to rotate left/right for f58, you're restricted to face the wireless receiver to ur built in flash thus make it harder to trigger wireless flash at extreme angle?

This post has been edited by tanjq87: May 19 2009, 01:51 AM
tanjq87
post May 19 2009, 02:09 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(albnok @ May 19 2009, 02:01 AM)
From the very day that the F58 was launched:

Only the A700 and A900 can use the F58 on camera to trigger the F42/F58.

Only the A900 can use the F58 on camera to trigger the F42/F58 AND F36/F56.

Too much is not known about the F20AM, let's wait until there is an actual model we can try out. I'm already set on buying one, and we'll have a TT to find out exactly what it can or cannot do.

tanjq87: I don't feel limited by the F58's head and its sensor - as long as light can bounce off the subject, into the sensor, it will trigger!
*
haha ok, i havent really tried it out yet, guess it's not a downside compared to f42 then...
sms me when there is a TT! hehe but dun be so last min tongue.gif

QUOTE(ieR @ May 19 2009, 02:03 AM)
tanjq87: i speak from my experince. i do agree Sony wish to keep thier classes diff with A700 A900 from the entry levels. but funny is, why they would even release a HVL-F20AM with wireless trigger ability?(mainly aiming A900 user? cheap flash for a rm9999 body, lol) but i still stick with a cheapo body, to me lens plays bigger roles, and the rest, photoshop can deal with it.

F58 is powerful, thus, always allow min of 2 metre from subject if u fire 1/32, if ttl, it will auto choose power (hidden power like 1/64 and 1/128)

*even the infra is not pointing straight, it will still trigger if it detects the flash from the body. try, go into ur room, turn off light, put the flash behind u (facing away from u) and u press the * button (will trigger the flash, will not shutter release), see if the F58 behind u fires. u'll get what i mean.
*
oh, didn't know there is hidden power! thought lowest is 1/32, that's why sometimes i find it too powerful when pointing direct.
(i don't get what u mean by press the * button will trigger the flash but not shutter release?)

oh ya, anyone know exactly how the wireless flash thing works? detect the built in flash+signal? cannot be built in flash alone right? cos when u try to focus, the pre-flash would not trigger the flash+ any other flash also cannot trigger the wireless flash.

This post has been edited by tanjq87: May 19 2009, 02:12 AM
tanjq87
post May 19 2009, 02:13 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(ieR @ May 19 2009, 02:10 AM)
* button = AElock
*
oh really? will try later..gonna go now, good night everyone who stays awake =)
tanjq87
post May 22 2009, 10:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


what lens they brought? haha


Added on May 22, 2009, 11:00 pmwhat lens they brought? haha

This post has been edited by tanjq87: May 22 2009, 11:00 PM
tanjq87
post May 22 2009, 11:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


haha, those are affordable poisons!
thank god the one i attended with full range of carl zeiss are all out of my budget tongue.gif
tanjq87
post May 23 2009, 12:00 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


nola, the pelita one is worse..5 zeiss each 5k, 2 A900, + some other 'cheaper' stuffs, at least 40-50k =.=
tanjq87
post May 25 2009, 01:11 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(albnok @ May 25 2009, 12:13 AM)

Let's say at 300mm F2.8 ISO200, it meters at 1/8000s. So it picks F11, so it becomes 300mm F11 ISO200 1/500s.

*
QUOTE(creepydslr @ May 25 2009, 01:02 AM)
albnok, care to explain a lil bit more how do u calculate that i enlightened for a better understanding...
*
i think i can help here, since ISO speed is the same ,from 1/8000s to 1/500s is 4 stops faster (i.e. 1/4000, 1/2000, 1/1000, 1/500), to compensate the slower shutter speed (hence more light coming in),
camera will darken aperture by 4 stops (From 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8 then 11), so that less light coming in to balance the exposure. smile.gif
tanjq87
post May 28 2009, 02:40 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


what were you holding? tamron 90mm macro, raynox + how many teleconverter?

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0210sec    0.49    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 07:31 PM